Sapphire R9 270X TOXIC VS R9270X 4GB

xero99 · Oct 14, 2013

These are similarly price but which performs better?
http://www.shop.bt.com/products/sapphire-technology-amd-radeon-r9-270x-1020mhz-4gb-gddr5-pci-e-3-0-hdmi-oc-90P0.html?refs=55570000-55120000
http://www.shop.bt.com/products/sapphire-technology-amd-radeon-r9-270x-1110hz-2gb-gddr5-pci-express-3-0-hdmi-toxic-90N1.html?refs=55570000-55120000

ksham · Oct 14, 2013

I pick the Toxic one. It is phenomenal and perhaps the fastest 270X on the market.

nokiddingboss · Oct 14, 2013

get the non-toxic one. it may have lower clocks but it has a higher vram which is going to be important with the impending onslaught of next gen games like bf4 and watchdogs to name a few.

xero99 · Oct 14, 2013

How much of a difference does 2gb vs 4gb of vram actually make? Could you back your answer up with evidence please?

Blindeagle · Oct 14, 2013

Toxic one u get 3gb that is fine for the future , dont listin to anyone who says u need 4gb, unless u are using multiple monitors

nokiddingboss · Oct 14, 2013

you can find it here at toms: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/battlefield-4-graphics-card-performance,3634-9.html
take note that its benchies from 1440p. look at the frame time variance chart. sure it applies only to 1440p right now, but what about the next batch of games? surely it safe to assume that it will only get tougher from here. and having a nice cushion is for the future is a pretty good thing to have even if that means lowering the details but still have that consistency. or just take the toxic one, your choice really. its not like you are going to game in 1440p ultra on a 270 anyways

Search

Sapphire R9 270X TOXIC VS R9270X 4GB

xero99

Honorable

ksham

Splendid

nokiddingboss

Honorable

xero99

Honorable

Blindeagle

Distinguished

nokiddingboss

Honorable

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page