coolshenoy :
so will i get most of software for windows 8 ? like vmware ,vb 6 etc many more
Which is nice...
... unless you already bought it.
It will be a brave company that dares to sell a customer a Windows 7 machine one day on the basis that it will fulfil future requirements and render it obsolete the next by not providing support.
What really makes me laugh though, the Pentium, or AMD, has an instruction set. A well established language that allows for communication in the native tongue of the CPU.
And that is a standard in common with all PC's and laptops.
Okay, SSE 34 and virtualization and new modes of power-saving deep sleep but in essence, the CPU's development is more in the field of lithography than it has been in electronics.
The CPU - standard. VGA protocols - standard. USB - standard. Sound, memory, Wi-Fi, SATA - all standard.
When you think of it that way, it's a bloody wonder that all software won't run on all machines.
Why is that? Programs written in the precisely the same language, machine code, that were written a few years ago simply won't run on modern systems.
Why is that?
If everything is standard then why is backward compatibility an issue?
Money. Don't you remember in the days of Windows 98 when there was legacy ISA support. For years DOS was supported. Years.
And now, a five year-old computer is a classic. (Did they have colour in those days?)
Microsoft Windows enforces protocols that other programmers have to be aware of. A program written for Windows is in fact
two programs.
One program of course is the one you intended to buy; GTA, Call of Duty, Mavis Beacon.
And the other program is the one that has to convince Windows that all the paperwork is in order. This program acts like the other program's lawyer.
The problem is though, every now and then, Microsoft decide to change the law but they only tell the lawyers whom are most recently appointed to the bar about these changes.
So, when you try to run an antique three year-old program, your lawyer is arrested for perjury and you are fined another $60.
Microsoft didn't need to change the law, really, and they didn't, much.
What they did was equivalent to randomly moving all the no-parking signs while we were all in bed sleeping. Many of us have woken up to find that we have become illegally parked without even moving the car.
But it is a very big bandwagon and plenty of room for Intel, Asus, NVidia, Radeon, not to mention how well Norton, McAfee, Kapersky do out of it.
It's perfect - they, admittedly cleverly, refine the lithographic process and their PR departments, admittedly cleverly, create the public perception that there is a direct relationship between improved lithography techniques and compatibility issues which can only be offset by Microsoft's intervention and production of new operating systems that understand nothing about the difference in the size of one transistor as compared to another.
Don't get me wrong; I'm as red-blooded as the next man and a well stacked CPU with a nice pair of double-cores will turn my head but surely that's a matter of choice.
Yes, I'd love a Porsche but the Micra is more suited to my needs.
I'd be really annoyed if just because they brought out a new model of super-car, they stopped making tyres for my newish car.
That's what Microsoft et al did.
Dude, if I were buying a new machine, I'd find the one that had the specifications I desire and I'd say to the guy (or girl), hey buddy/honey (delete as appropriate), I want this machine but with Windows 7 on it.
Or XP, for a bit of fun.
But you are as entitled to that as you are to say, hey, I want that car but I don't want the funky alloy wheels.
Don't let them make you have alloy wheels.
If this post is not the solution to the problem then I just don't know what is.