Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Budget Server Build (Minecraft) - Looking for suggestions

Last response: in Systems
Share
October 22, 2013 8:51:02 PM

Greetings,

I've built a gaming desktop before, but I've never built a server so I really don't know what I'm getting myself into. Me and my wife are Minecraft addicts but have succumb to the constant world resets and raging pre-adolescents that dominant most public servers. That being said, we're interested in building our own server for our house that will be strictly dedicated to running a Minecraft server.

My initial thoughts are pretty sparing because as I said I'm more familiar with the desktop approach to things. Here are a few initial questions I have:

  • Is it possible to fit server architecture in a small package? Since this is only going to be for Minecraft, I was looking for a small physical footprint because I intend on sticking it in a corner and forgetting about it.
  • In terms of hard drive, is there a significant performance gain when it comes to hard disks vs SSD? I know that Minecraft frequently writes to the world files and undergoes loading chunks while exploring the world, so my instinct says read/write speeds would impact overall game performance, but I'm not entirely sure.
  • This last question is really specific, and I only expect people who have experienced Minecraft to know the answer: Does Minecraft take advantage of multi-core systems?

  • Also, here's my goals for the system:

    • Small physical footprint
    • Quiet
    • Budget friendly (It'd be awesome to get <$500)
    • Optimized solely to run Minecraft


  • Again, I'm completely new to the server side of things so any help and/or tips would be greatly appreciated! Cheers.
    October 22, 2013 9:10:46 PM


    Like this is mine and would be good for a Minecraft server
    m
    0
    l

    Best solution

    October 22, 2013 9:37:30 PM

    Assuming this is just for your family in your house, your external internet speeds shouldn't make much of a difference (excepting the times you connect when you are out of your house).

    Again, assuming this is just for your family (small numbers of players connected at a single time), you don't really need a powerhouse. I run a small server for my family which is based off an old Athlon X2, 4 Gigs of DDR2, and an IDE drive. This works fine for a small number of players. The cheapest solution would be to reuse a machine that you have. At that point, you could look into a more powerful machine if you decide you want to.

    To answer your questions more specifically:
    Yes, it is very possible to fit a small Minecraft server into a very small package. Conceivably, you could use something like http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168... or http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168... .

    If your building your own mini-sized computer, a small SSD would make sense, as a single world (even when very large) does not use much space. Furthermore, if you go with a headless (no monitor, keyboard, or mouse) setup running something like Ubuntu Server, you hardly need any storage space anyway. Chunk loading should be better with an SSD vs a traditional HDD.

    Minecraft can to a degree take advantage of multiple cores, but it is still more dependent on individual core speed (overall speed, not just clock rate). With a server, the requirements are lessened because the client's workload is not present.
    Share
    !