Trouble Overclocking Intel Core i7-3770K with GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UD5H

timberclipse

Honorable
Oct 25, 2013
12
0
10,510
Hello,

I have a custom build PC I have been suing for about 6 months now. Unfortunately, despite my continued efforts on my own to get my system to overclock, I cannot succeed in making it work.

I have boosted my 3.5ghz to different levels including a 39x100MHz (3.9) and as high as 42x100MHz (4.2). Upon saving, there is no recognition of a speed increase and no improvements with benchmarks or under normal use.

I have also set up the BIOS to be ready for "extreme" workloads, but, alas, still no luck.

I am hoping that someone might have some suggestions as after a lot of searching, I have still yet to find anything that would help.

The full build is as follows:
Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge 3.5GHz (3.9GHz Turbo) (Over-clock goal is to 4.3-4.5GHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2048MB
GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UD5H LGA 1155 Intel Z77 HDMI SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
32 GB RAM 1333MHz DDR3 RAM
Running OSX 10.8.4
Samsung CD/DVD Burn Drive (CDDVDW SH-224BB)
SATA Card Reader
Dual ASUS 1920x1080 Displays (21'')

In addition I have a SSD Main Drive and an additional 6 Internal Drives
 
Solution
hmm, have you modded the BIOS in any way for OS X? i do remember some hackintosh users stating they were able to overclock but, i didn't see many (could be just the fact there aren't many hackintosh users). your best bet will probably be posting on one of the hackintosh forums like www.tonymacx86.com.

mr1hm

Distinguished
hmm, have you modded the BIOS in any way for OS X? i do remember some hackintosh users stating they were able to overclock but, i didn't see many (could be just the fact there aren't many hackintosh users). your best bet will probably be posting on one of the hackintosh forums like www.tonymacx86.com.
 
Solution

timberclipse

Honorable
Oct 25, 2013
12
0
10,510


I can certainly look into posting there, but I wasn't aware that there would be a difference for overclocking when using OSX? I would have expected the processor to have been independent?

Thanks!
 

mr1hm

Distinguished


i thought so too :??: but, i'm not too experienced with hackintosh so the problem may lie elsewhere, such as an older BIOS version.

i attempted getting OS X installed on to my PC but, gave up when kernel "panics" (i think it's called a kernel panic?). i'll have a skim around the forums and see if i can find any similar issues regarding this. :)

in the meantime, if you do the same, we can help speed up the process. post back if you end up finding something and i'll do the same.
 

mr1hm

Distinguished
ok, so your BIOS also shows the stock speeds when you've manually set the overclock higher correct? (Under the M.I.T. section i believe).

if the BIOS also shows stock speeds, what's your BIOS version? (should be labeled F"x" so something like F15 for example).
 

timberclipse

Honorable
Oct 25, 2013
12
0
10,510


So you totally lost me, I think the answer is F14, but I figured the easiest thing to do might be to just post the photos of what I have/see.

So here we go:
http://cl.ly/image/2v060f0f2c0Y
http://cl.ly/image/2N2Z2N3x152q
http://cl.ly/image/132U172m0K36
http://cl.ly/image/1a1D3m3U3j1a
 

mr1hm

Distinguished
hmm, it seems like the overclock is working. when you see your clock speeds in OS X and it doesn't show 4.2GHz and rather see the speeds jump around lower than specified speeds it's probably because the CPU doesn't need to use the overclocked speeds. this is caused by something called Intel Speedstep/EIST which helps to save power during light-loading/idle conditions.

however, once your CPU is under heavy load, you should see the CPU's speed pegged @ 4.2GHz as you've specified; so, if you see your CPU's speed not pegged @ 4.2GHz when you're not running any programs/games, this is normal. if your CPU is under a decent/intense amount of load, you should definitely see your CPU hitting 4.2GHz (although you may see your speed not pegged @ 4.2GHz, it's a possibility that you'll see the speed jump to 4.2GHz for a brief moment and bring itself back down which is also normal).

i dont know if there are stress tests compatible with Mac OS X but, if there is, running a stress test and watching your speeds would be one sure way of verifying that your overclock is working.
 

timberclipse

Honorable
Oct 25, 2013
12
0
10,510




So I ran a stress test called CPUTest, everything passed, but it gave me absolutely no information as to the speed of my drive. Or at least not that I am aware of.

Running the primenent I got this as the result:
1 : 1 Selftest 6 (256 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M4816897...
1 : 1 Selftest 6 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 7 (288 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M5505023...
1 : 1 Selftest 7 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 8 (320 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M6029311...
1 : 1 Selftest 8 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 9 (384 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M6684673...
1 : 1 Selftest 9 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 10 (448 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M7798783...
1 : 1 Selftest 10 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 11 (512 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M9043967...
1 : 1 Selftest 11 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 12 (576 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M10223617...
1 : 1 Selftest 12 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 13 (640 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M11927551...
1 : 1 Selftest 13 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 14 (768 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M13631489...
1 : 1 Selftest 14 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 15 (896 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M16515073...
1 : 1 Selftest 15 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 16 (1024 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M18874367...
1 : 1 Selftest 16 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 17 (1152 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M20971521...
1 : 1 Selftest 17 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 18 (1280 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M23592959...
1 : 1 Selftest 18 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 19 (1536 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M26738687...
1 : 1 Selftest 19 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 20 (1792 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M33030143...
1 : 1 Selftest 20 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 21 (2048 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M36700159...
1 : 1 Selftest 21 success!

The "enourmous" test gave a similar result:

In both cases however, my computer was still fully functional and felt no change in lag of anything. I also am able to render and export 4K video footage from a film I am working for with similar results.
1 : 1 Selftest 26 (4096 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M69730303...
1 : 1 Selftest 26 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 27 (4608 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M81593293...
1 : 1 Selftest 27 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 28 (5120 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M90123133...
1 : 1 Selftest 28 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 29 (6144 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M108000043...
1 : 1 Selftest 29 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 30 (7168 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M123000011...
1 : 1 Selftest 30 success!
1 : 1 Selftest 31 (8192 K FFT-runlength). 100 iterations for M145000033...
1 : 1 Selftest 31 success!

So not sure if those tests tell us anything?