screw the 760 SC, the 760 FTW costs 10 dollars more, but still significantly lower than the toxic BUT has the same boost clock. so which is the better deal?
Go for the Toxic as it is faster and the 4GB 760 can't even utilize all 4GB of the memory it has on account of its narrow bus. The Toxic is definitely the best choice here as it is the best of the 280X's
the 760 FTW:http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-GTX760-Dual-Link-04G-P4-3768-KR/dp/B00E0N49C8/ref=cm_cr_pr_sims_t
the toxic:http://www.amazon.com/Sapphire-DL-DVI-I-SL-DVI-D-PCI-Express-11221-01-40G/dp/B00FLMKR78/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382703386&sr=8-1&keywords=sapphire+r9+280x+toxic
Go for the Toxic as it is faster and the 4GB 760 can't even utilize all 4GB of the memory it has on account of its narrow bus. The Toxic is definitely the best choice here as it is the best of the 280X's