I've been discussing overclocking my cpu with my brother in law who is a "Computer guy" he's built plenty of computers and i trust his judgment. Having said that I planned on OC'ing my CPU to 4.1ghz instead of the regular 3.4ghz that the CPU offers. This being pointed out mainly because i spent the extra money to get the unlocked CPU. I also, to be safe, got the Z87 Sabertooth which, one of its main selling points being the Thermal Radar and the Aux fans on the actual motherboard can not only keep the CPU and GPU cooler, but if they get too hot there is a program that comes with the MoBo that tells you at what tempurature the Components are actually at. Our argument is that i say as long as i keep my CPU pretty cool. (50C and 65C) that i shouldn't have too many problems with the CPU life shortening. Whereas he says that OC'ing in general 'greatly' reduces CPU life. Now if the CPU lasts me 5-10 years that would be fine with me. but if the CPU is only going to only last 2 years because im OC'ing. Then is it really worth it? Please feel free to share stories or any answers you may have. Thanks