AMD FX-4350 or AMD FX-6300 or AMD FX-8120

Solution
Go with one of the piledriver AMD CPU's. The more cores, the more potential. Any piledriver from 6300 upwards will be great. Here's a list of them on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piledriver_(microarchitecture) <-- Those brackets should be included in the link btw.

Definitely get a good cooler too.

CTurbo

Pizza Monster
Moderator
The FX 41xx, 61xx, and 81xx were the first of a new technology that was ultimately a huge letdown. They were in reality a small step back to what they replaced. AMD quickly revised the tech and fixed some of it's shortcomings with the newer 43xx, 63xx, and 83xx models.
 
Go with one of the piledriver AMD CPU's. The more cores, the more potential. Any piledriver from 6300 upwards will be great. Here's a list of them on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piledriver_(microarchitecture) <-- Those brackets should be included in the link btw.

Definitely get a good cooler too.
 
Solution

CTurbo

Pizza Monster
Moderator
Well the biggest problem with the CM 212 is it's freakin HUGE! Other than that, it's pretty much THE most popular cooler on the market, and while it may be a bit loud, I've very rarely heard somebody complain about it's performance. Go read the reviews yourself to see.
 


Yeah, definitely depends on the OP's case size.
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator


In most apps they will be quite similar. In software that uses more than 6 cores, yea the 8320 would be superior.
 


Also it has the multitasking things on it's side e.g. gaming and streaming with minimal FPS loss.
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator
threadnecromancyns1nf0.jpg