battlefield 4 benchmark; fx 8350 beat i5 4670k and easily

After the benchmark done by the Russian website last night, it seems that fx 8350 is the high end option of the new generation, it's worth mentioning the CPU load which shows this is half of the power of FX 8350: http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/
The upcoming game watch dogs promised to use all eight cores fully loaded...i5s will use medium settings for that game!? I wonder.
49 answers Last reply
More about battlefield benchmark 8350 beat 4670k easily
  1. ORLY?

    How about we use hardware not from before 2 years? Also your bench is single player only, while what I'll link now is multi-player.


    There you go, buddy. Release data for both GTX780 and 290X, using CPUs' from the latest generation and all price ranges.

    GTX: http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_geforce.png
    290X: http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_radeon.png

    http://pclab.pl/art55318-3.html


    Not that I care really, my I7 eats your AMD for breakfast anyway :p
  2. they didn't OC the i5-5670K, it was kept at stock clock of 3.4 Ghz, and still lost to the FX 8350 by two~three frames only.
    thats funny.
    http://gamegpu.ru/images/remote/http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Battlefield_4-test-bf4_proz_2.jpg
  3. @anas bashar
    neither did they oc the fx 8350 thou the fx is running at 50-60% load.

    @gaidax
    would be funny if a 300-700 $ solutions doesnt beat a 120$ solution :'D

    http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/
  4. Patrick Guenter said:
    @anas bashar
    neither did they oc the fx 8350 thou the fx is running at 50-60% load.

    @gaidax
    would be funny if a 300-700 $ solutions doesnt beat a 120$ solution :'D

    http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/


    But you see, what about the benches I linked? Who is telling the truth then?

    Honestly, until some well known site does a proper benchmark, I think it is all just bs anyway
  5. gamegpu.ru is normally providing pretty good results^^
  6. Gaidax said:
    ORLY?

    How about we use hardware not from before 2 years?


    There you go, buddy. Release data for both GTX780 and 290X, using CPUs' from the latest generation and all price ranges.

    GTX: http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_geforce.png
    290X: http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_radeon.png

    http://pclab.pl/art55318-3.html


    Not that I care really, my I7 eats your AMD for breakfast anyway :p

    man I live in poland, that site is not trustworthy even in poland, every one knows that this web site doesn't even do benchmarks, you'd better find an english web site, even a 6 year old child in poland knows pclab.pl is a joke how come you rely on it!? :lol:
  7. And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.
  8. Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot
  9. Patrick Guenter said:
    gamegpu.ru is normally providing pretty good results^^


    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.

    the russian web site is a wll-known website, in eastern europe, man you don't live in east of europe so you have no idea...every single guy knows how unbiased this web site is...just look at their previous records...so you wait for it, I have got my answer . And i5 4670k is 3 years old now, look closer i5 4670k is included
  10. Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot


    They are also 3 years old and 2 generations behind CPUs'
  11. Samuel25 said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    gamegpu.ru is normally providing pretty good results^^


    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.

    the russian web site is a wll-known website, in eastern europe, man you don't live in east of europe so you have no idea...every single guy knows how unbiased this web site is...just look at their previous records...so you wait for it, I have got my answer . And i5 4670k is 3 years old now, look closer i5 4670k is included


    For your information, I speak Russian and I know which site is trusted and which is not, pal.
  12. Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot


    They are also 3 years old and 2 generations behind CPUs'


    get down from your fanboy horse.

    as they are used and always compared its totaly legit, really dude, get your things right.
  13. Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot


    They are also 3 years old and 2 generations behind CPUs'

    common i5-4670k is there you used to say it was better than fx 8350
  14. Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot


    They are also 3 years old and 2 generations behind CPUs'


    get down from your fanboy horse.

    as they are used and always compared its totaly legit, really dude, get your things right.


    So, what can you say about this thing then?

    http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_gpu_t.png
  15. Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot


    They are also 3 years old and 2 generations behind CPUs'


    get down from your fanboy horse.

    as they are used and always compared its totaly legit, really dude, get your things right.


    So, what can you say about this thing then?

    http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_gpu_t.png



    totally shit.

    bf4 is limited by gpu.
    ...
    ...
    ...
  16. Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    And that russian site that links Sandy Bridge CPUs' from before 3 years is trustworthy? They are both crap.

    I wait for some real review, not some 3rd world crap anyway.


    these sandy bridge cpu's still get recommended often and are pretty much used alot


    They are also 3 years old and 2 generations behind CPUs'


    get down from your fanboy horse.

    as they are used and always compared its totaly legit, really dude, get your things right.


    So, what can you say about this thing then?

    http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/chaostheory/2013/10/bf4/charts/bf4_cpu_gpu_t.png


    dude it seems you don't get it do you!? pclab.pl is only a website, they don't even do benchmarks I live in Poland not you, just go into any shop and say pclab.pl they will laugh at your face, even a 6 year old child knows this in poland
  17. LOL just read the review - I happen to be a native russian speaker:

    There you go, their note at the bottom:

    Внесём ясность на некоторые вопросы по игре Battlefield 4
    -тест мультиплеера мы проведём позже когда сервера станут стабильнее, превратятся вылеты и всякого рода баги, тогда же подоспеют новые видеокарты AMD и мы получим более улучшенный обзор.


    Translation:

    We would like to clarify - we will be performing multiplayer test later when servers become more stable, bugs get fixed and we receive new AMD GPU hardware to make a better review.


    I think you screwed up, guys. Those are single player benches, while mine are actual multiplayer :p
  18. Gaidax said:
    LOL just read the review - I happen to be a native russian speaker:

    There you go, their note at the bottom:

    Внесём ясность на некоторые вопросы по игре Battlefield 4
    -тест мультиплеера мы проведём позже когда сервера станут стабильнее, превратятся вылеты и всякого рода баги, тогда же подоспеют новые видеокарты AMD и мы получим более улучшенный обзор.


    Translation:

    We would like to clarify - we will be performing multiplayer test later when servers become more stable, bugs get fixed and we receive new AMD GPU hardware to make a better review.


    I think you screwed up, guys. Those are single player benches, while mine are actual multiplayer :p



    you screwd up dude.
    we were talking bout the sp benchmarks, you came with totally off benchmarks. thx for calrifying that your answer's where shit to that point.
  19. Gaidax said:
    LOL just read the review - I happen to be a native russian speaker:

    There you go, their note at the bottom:

    Внесём ясность на некоторые вопросы по игре Battlefield 4
    -тест мультиплеера мы проведём позже когда сервера станут стабильнее, превратятся вылеты и всякого рода баги, тогда же подоспеют новые видеокарты AMD и мы получим более улучшенный обзор.


    Translation:

    We would like to clarify - we will be performing multiplayer test later when servers become more stable, bugs get fixed and we receive new AMD GPU hardware to make a better review.


    I think you screwed up, guys. Those are single player benches, while mine are actual multiplayer :p


    :lol: you can stay happy for the time being, pclab.pl doesn't do benchmarks :lol: even in multiplayer fx 8350 is much better i5 4670k in this tittle... why dont intel fanboys understand i wonder...be happy yes yes you are right
  20. Who the f cares about single player? You buy BF4 to play single player? lol
  21. Gaidax said:
    Who the f cares about single player? You buy BF4 to play single player? lol

    Really why are so sad now!? dude don't worry if servers are not stable so how did pclab.pl did mutiplayer benchmarks!!? :lol: fx 8350 has smoked i5 4670k...everything else is blind fanboysim
  22. more people care about sp than about you TT

    http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html

    english trusted ws benchmarks
  23. Patrick Guenter said:
    more people care about sp than about you TT

    http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html

    english trusted ws benchmarks


    It seems in this benchmark I5-3570 is better than FX, what happened to the russian info credibility where FX was better than I5-4670? :(((
  24. Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    more people care about sp than about you TT

    http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html

    english trusted ws benchmarks


    It seems in this benchmark I5-3570 is better than FX, what happened to the russian info credibility where FX was better than I5-4670? :(((


    different test setups, if u know what that means?
    different gaming scene. there are so much possibilitys.
  25. Yup and that's why this thread is ridiculous to begin with.

    brb, collecting my paycheck from Intel.
  26. Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    more people care about sp than about you TT

    http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html

    english trusted ws benchmarks


    It seems in this benchmark I5-3570 is better than FX, what happened to the russian info credibility where FX was better than I5-4670? :(((


    ... Gaidax where did you get that russian sentence from!???!?!?
  27. Samuel25 said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    Gaidax said:
    Patrick Guenter said:
    more people care about sp than about you TT

    http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html

    english trusted ws benchmarks


    It seems in this benchmark I5-3570 is better than FX, what happened to the russian info credibility where FX was better than I5-4670? :(((


    different test setups, if u know what that means?
    different gaming scene. there are so much possibilitys.

    he doesn't understand, he is that dumb...and Gaidax where did you get that russian sentence from!???!?!?


    From the russian review you all link your crummy single player benches from?

    http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-4-test-gpu.html

    If you don't trust me - copy a part of a sentence, press "CTRL+F" and see if it's there... lolol
  28. Gaidax said:
    Yup and that's why this thread is ridiculous to begin with.

    brb, collecting my paycheck from Intel.

    what is it with Intel fan boys!!!?
  29. Samuel25 said:
    Gaidax said:
    Yup and that's why this thread is ridiculous to begin with.

    brb, collecting my paycheck from Intel.

    :lol: why are you sooooooooo angry my friend!!? lemme pamper you a little bit



    My GF is on period, I'm having a hard time, my friend :p

    She's like the nicest girl ever... but 2 days before it starts and 2-3 days during it, holy crap... RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!
  30. Gaidax said:
    Samuel25 said:
    Gaidax said:
    Yup and that's why this thread is ridiculous to begin with.

    brb, collecting my paycheck from Intel.

    :lol: why are you sooooooooo angry my friend!!? lemme pamper you a little bit



    My GF is on period, I'm having a hard time, my friend :p

    She's like the nicest girl ever... but 2 days before it starts and 2-3 days during it, holy crap... RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!
  31. Gaidax said:
    Samuel25 said:
    Gaidax said:
    Yup and that's why this thread is ridiculous to begin with.

    brb, collecting my paycheck from Intel.

    :lol: why are you sooooooooo angry my friend!!? lemme pamper you a little bit



    My GF is on period, I'm having a hard time, my friend :p

    She's like the nicest girl ever... but 2 days before it starts and 2-3 days during it, holy crap... RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!


    i feel with you bro
  32. I am always on period.
  33. ITT: People trying to justify their choice in processors, whatever that may be.
  34. Samuel25 said:
    Gaidax said:
    I am always on period.

    oh not my Favorited type then, :pt1cable: visit a doctor man!!! do you also have a bleeding nose!?


    Yeah, sometimes I roll my face over the keyboard too much and get Any key stuck in my nose... hurts.
  35. Anub1s said:
    ITT: People trying to justify their choice in processors, whatever that may be.


    IKR? If you're happy with the performance you got for the price you paid, does it really matter in the end? They're both very capable but cater for different markets.
  36. gamegpu.re was multiplayer, i checked the russian website again, and again who buys bf4 to play single player!!?
  37. Some serious Intel fangirling up in this bitch.
  38. eh?

    http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/



    4670k ~ FX-8350. At max OC though, Intel tends to gain more performance then AMD, so Intel would likely pull ahead at max OC.

    http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html



    GPU bottlenecked with a single GPU anyways.

    http://pclab.pl/art55318-3.html




    FX 8350 ~ i5 2500k, or the same exact placement thats existed for over two years now.
  39. eh?

    dude no pclab.pl....is that really hard to understand!!? pclab.pl doesn't run tests at all, uh God, do you think you know better than me about this web site!? I live in poland :??:
    come to think of it intel guys don't understand...I mean i wish some polish friends were here to laugh at your graphs
  40. just look at ot it can you put any sense in pclab.pl fx 8350+nvidia works like an i5....fx8350+amd is not a good choice, listen to yourself dude, why do you make people laugh
  41. because consoles like ps4 and x box one has 8 cores too game dev only care about consoles so getting a fx 8350 may be better
  42. AMD.. INTEL..
    I'm a Chevy guy. Because I can go fast in my Camaro SS, and that will give me a rush that no computer part will ever be able too. Plus muscle cars make them panties drop.
  43. So what the conclusion guys?
    who wins?core i5 4670k or FX 8350 8 cores?
  44. ChevyGuy69 said:
    AMD.. INTEL..
    I'm a Chevy guy. Because I can go fast in my Camaro SS, and that will give me a rush that no computer part will ever be able too. Plus muscle cars make them panties drop.


    Thanks for a subjectively irrelevant comment. Don't you have a mullet to comb?



    Of course the FX 8350 has better benchmarks in Battlefield 4. Largely because Battlefield 4 is optimized for more threads. The i5 4670K is not an HT capable chip. So it would make sense for a chip with some form of HT to come out with better benchmarks on a game designed for thread usage. Were these benchmarks on a handful of games then yes, the i5 4670K would walk all over the FX with it's single core performance.

    It's naive and frankly stupid to draw conclusions on a specific CPU based on results of one game.

    http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/446/AMD_FX-Series_FX-8350_vs_Intel_Core_i5_i5-4670K.html
  45. Thanks @powerbolt. Intel i5 and intel i7 rocks in multitasking and gaming
  46. I'm speaking from experience, and let me tel you, my 8350 bottlenecked the hell outta me on bf4 multiplayer. So glad I picked up a 4690k. I've never been more happy with a hardware upgrade.
  47. asad dab said:
    because consoles like ps4 and x box one has 8 cores too game dev only care about consoles so getting a fx 8350 may be better


    Not dissing the 8350 since I rock it but they probably went with that since the 6-core i7 wasn't cutting it with its $500+ price tag
  48. If toms didn't have such a piece of shit mobile website I'd be able to quote the person I'm asking this but if he sees it so be it he'll answer:I'm not down on the whole AMD vs Intel bs blah blah I don't care my system rocks and that's what I care about, I just wonder why the cause of your 8350 bottlenecking you on bf4? I upgrade from 8120 to 8350 and seen awesome results but not only that I didn't have a problem with my 8120 on bf4 either. That is on 64 player servers...
  49. ldewitt said:
    If toms didn't have such a piece of shit mobile website I'd be able to quote the person I'm asking this but if he sees it so be it he'll answer:I'm not down on the whole AMD vs Intel bs blah blah I don't care my system rocks and that's what I care about, I just wonder why the cause of your 8350 bottlenecking you on bf4? I upgrade from 8120 to 8350 and seen awesome results but not only that I didn't have a problem with my 8120 on bf4 either. That is on 64 player servers...


    I'm not sure man. While in any server at all, my frames would drop SIGNIFICANTLY, I'm talking low 30s. I monitored cpu usage and gpu usage. Whenever the frame drops occurred, cpu was around 70-75, which caused my gpu usage to plummet to around 50-60, dropping my frames. Now with my 4690k my gpu usage never plummets the way it did with the 8350.
Ask a new question

Read More

Battlefield Benchmark CPUs Intel i5