DisNDat :
kristianAA :
tough amds fx 8350 will perform better on 1440p res than any i5
JOOK-D :
kristianAA :
tough amds fx 8350 will perform better on 1440p res than any i5
He already has an intel mobo, no point bringing it up considering it's also untrue
.
I don't actually have the mobo yet. The gpu, psu, case and ram sticks are the only things delivered.
Is it untrue about fx? It'd save me another $50 or so which could eventually go into SLI 780s. I don't wanna do fx if it has unstable temps or just isn't as good though.
i5 k series: Great for everything, amazing at gaming, runs cool with low power consumption, overclocks well
AMD FX (piledriver): Great for multithreaded apps (video editing, 3d modelling), good for gaming especially newer titles that utilise more cores (worse on older titles that are single threaded), overclocks well, may run hotter, uses more power (3570k 77W tdp, FX 8350 125W tdp), BUT all on a budget (Can be 2/3 or 3/5 of the price of the intel products). The FX 8320 for example is £120~ and can be clocked up to FX 8350 speeds, saving £30~ pounds, which is £50~ cheaper than an intel i5 k series. AMD motherboards tend to have a lot of features for less money also.
All in all, if you're going for high end gaming, go with the i5 k series (3570/4670). If you want to do that on a budget, extremely well for the price, go for AMD. i5 wins in gaming, AMD can win for work apps like video editing etc, but AMD has recently come close to the i5's for gaming performance with the introduction of more core/thread support in newer games.