Hi guys i need some help to choose over these cpu-s,so please help me!
I can get fx 6300 for 125$,8320 for 158$ and i5 2400 for like 170$+...
I'm oriented on gaming,so please tell me what's the best choice out of this 3 cpu-s,thanks!
Do you stream as well? Then go with the 8320, otherwise 6300 is fine and dandy for all games. Also remember that all FX processors are unlocked, so you can easily overclock as well if you got the board for it.
Yeah i know that Intel chips are better for gaming,but i5 2400 is 60$ more expensive than fx 6300,and i don't care about few fps,so i think that fx is better choce...i consider that u can OC fx 6300 alot,and it should come close in performance with i5 2400,because i5 2400 can't oc much...
The CPU alone costs +36% more and provides +43% more performance.
Once you factor in other components the systems cost difference may only be +5% more expensive (if not the same price) and still provide +43% more performance.
Last time I checked +5% more cost (overall) for +43% more performance was common sense, and why AMD's market share keeps below 30%.
How much extra do these overclocking geared AMD motherboards cost versus their standard variets?
You may end up throwing money away on a 'maybe' (the overclock) instead of a 'definite' (the Core i5-2400's performance is known up front).
A 4.5ghz FX 6300/6350 is a little under a stock i5 3570k in gaming. I think think we can all agree that a stock 3570k > i5 2400. I should know as I own both of them. i5 3570k in the gaming rig and an i5 2400 in the file server.