Amd fx 6300 vs 8320 vs Intel i5 2400
- Thread starter kambz0301
- Start date
8350 is like 40,50$ more than 8320...
TheLastDoomguy
Honorable
- Oct 23, 2013
- 156
- 0
- 10,710
i5 2400 hands down.
- It's almost +50% faster in games when push comes to shove
- The frames stutter heaps less (which you can Google as 99th percentile frame time, etc.).
- It's almost +50% faster in games when push comes to shove
- The frames stutter heaps less (which you can Google as 99th percentile frame time, etc.).
Yeah i know that Intel chips are better for gaming,but i5 2400 is 60$ more expensive than fx 6300,and i don't care about few fps,so i think that fx is better choce...i consider that u can OC fx 6300 alot,and it should come close in performance with i5 2400,because i5 2400 can't oc much...
TheLastDoomguy
Honorable
- Oct 23, 2013
- 156
- 0
- 10,710
The CPU alone costs +36% more and provides +43% more performance.
Once you factor in other components the systems cost difference may only be +5% more expensive (if not the same price) and still provide +43% more performance.
Last time I checked +5% more cost (overall) for +43% more performance was common sense, and why AMD's market share keeps below 30%.
How much extra do these overclocking geared AMD motherboards cost versus their standard variets?
You may end up throwing money away on a 'maybe' (the overclock) instead of a 'definite' (the Core i5-2400's performance is known up front).
Once you factor in other components the systems cost difference may only be +5% more expensive (if not the same price) and still provide +43% more performance.
Last time I checked +5% more cost (overall) for +43% more performance was common sense, and why AMD's market share keeps below 30%.
How much extra do these overclocking geared AMD motherboards cost versus their standard variets?
You may end up throwing money away on a 'maybe' (the overclock) instead of a 'definite' (the Core i5-2400's performance is known up front).
- Apr 27, 2009
- 37,552
- 3,222
- 143,290
A 4.5ghz FX 6300/6350 is a little under a stock i5 3570k in gaming. I think think we can all agree that a stock 3570k > i5 2400. I should know as I own both of them. :lol: i5 3570k in the gaming rig and an i5 2400 in the file server.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
News Windows 11 will reportedly display a watermark if your PC does not support AI requirements- Started by Admin
- Replies: 18
-
Question Can I plug a docking station to a USB-C 2.0 port to have video output?- Started by jameli
- Replies: 2
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram