i5 4670K or Fx-8350, upgrade worth the hassle?

xasylum

Honorable
Jun 18, 2012
106
0
10,710
So basically I currently have a Phenom II x4 945, and I plan on selling it for around $80 to a friend that wants a CPU upgrade, and If I were to switch to Intel I would sell my Mobo as well, to a total price $190 or so, and then buy the i5 and a board in the price range similar to mine(~140), So I'm wondering should I switch over to Intel and buying a new cpu and board, or is the performance gain not worth it in gaming compared to the FX-8350

Current Setup:
CPU: Phenom II X4 945
MOBO: ASRock MB-990EX4
GPU: HD 6870 (plan to upgrade to 770 in a bout a month)
Ram: 8GB
PSU: 750w

Games I usually play
Arma 2&3
Heavily modded Skyrim + Fallout
Battlefield 4
Occasionally some rendering as well.
 
Solution
Get the 8320. You already have an AMD3+ motherboard and the few exra 100MHz offered by the 8350 compared to the 8320 isnt worth it if you don't have water cooling or one completely kickass motherboard.

Lessthannil

Honorable
Oct 14, 2013
468
0
10,860
Get the 8320. You already have an AMD3+ motherboard and the few exra 100MHz offered by the 8350 compared to the 8320 isnt worth it if you don't have water cooling or one completely kickass motherboard.
 
Solution

xasylum

Honorable
Jun 18, 2012
106
0
10,710


So is the only difference that the 8350 has over the 8320 is that is clocked higher?

If so I could probably overclock to the 8350 clock with my 212 Evo?
 

Ags1

Honorable
Apr 26, 2012
255
0
10,790
On hwbot, it appears that the 8320 and 8350 overclock about the same - the 8350 only gets 100MHz more.

The BF4 benchmark results are difficult to interpret - it depends which patched version is being looked at, and it also appears that the 8350 only really eclipses the i5 chips in 64-player maps.

When comparing i5 to 8350, it is worth looking at minimum frame rates - the 8350 often has a lower average FPS than an equivalent i5, but has a higher minimum FPS, which is probably more important.