I5 4670k vs I7 3770k vs AMD FX 8350

So yeah best cpu up there at the top?
I may consider getting into YT and considering "next gen" consoles have 8 cores 8 weak cores but games will still be optimized for 8 cores. If you could provide a reason I would be grateful.
Thanks in advance (:
8 answers Last reply
More about 4670k 3770k amd 8350
  1. Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.
  2. dextermat said:
    Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.


    Fx 8350= R9 290x and ssd
    4670k=780 and ssd
    3770k=4gb 770 and ssd or 780 with no ssd and I'll get one later, what would you go for?
  3. RyanDavidson said:
    dextermat said:
    Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.


    Fx 8350= R9 290x and ssd
    4670k=780 and ssd
    3770k=4gb 770 and ssd or 780 with no ssd and I'll get one later, what would you go for?


    I would go for the 4670k, 780, and SSD. an overclocked 780 will still beat an R9-290X, and the 290X is having cooling issues, leaving them only very useful if you were to watercool them.
  4. Drew010 said:
    RyanDavidson said:
    dextermat said:
    Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.


    Fx 8350= R9 290x and ssd
    4670k=780 and ssd
    3770k=4gb 770 and ssd or 780 with no ssd and I'll get one later, what would you go for?


    I would go for the 4670k, 780, and SSD. an overclocked 780 will still beat an R9-290X, and the 290X is having cooling issues, leaving them only very useful if you were to watercool them.


    Would the 3770k not give me better performance seeing as bf4 uses 8 cores plus the ssd will be easy to get just have to wait a month for it though it is nearing the 2 year age mark I just don't know :s
  5. the 4670k beats the 8350 in pretty much everything gaming wise but obviously if your on a budget build then the 8350 is the way to go :-)
  6. dextermat said:
    Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.


    Tbh I think I may just get the 4670k and pick up a h100i at a later stage to get a decent OC on it. Thanks for your help (:
  7. bouncedk said:
    Drew010 said:
    RyanDavidson said:
    dextermat said:
    Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.


    Fx 8350= R9 290x and ssd
    4670k=780 and ssd
    3770k=4gb 770 and ssd or 780 with no ssd and I'll get one later, what would you go for?


    an overclocked 780 will still beat an R9-290X, and the 290X is having cooling issues, leaving them only very useful if you were to watercool them.


    Quite imaginary aren't we?


    Not really, if you look at the 3Dmark firestrike scores, an overclocked GTX 780 scores ~1000 higher than a Titan, which in turn scores higher than an R9-290X
  8. RyanDavidson said:
    dextermat said:
    Hi,

    First off, you cannot compare console game to pc games.

    Second: get the AMD FX 8350 if your on a budget, the I7 3770k if your rich and I5 4670k if it's for gaming.


    Fx 8350= R9 290x and ssd
    4670k=780 and ssd
    3770k=4gb 770 and ssd or 780 with no ssd and I'll get one later, what would you go for?

    Get the R9 290x it's much more powerful than the 780 especially if it's a non-reference card.
Ask a new question

Read More

Intel i7 CPUs Intel i5