battlefield 4 fx 8350 vs i7 4770k

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
metalmachinist

metalmachinist

Honorable
Apr 3, 2013
221
0
10,690
Heres the deal, i have an fx 6300 cpu and want to upgrade. My 6300 wont handle a second 680 in sli, i already have an am3+ mobo, should i get the 8350 and second 680 or i7 4770k with mobo and no second 680. Which will battlefield 4 benefit from most? I heard bf4was built on fx 8350 systems.
 
Solution
Jake Wenta


Well the resolution changes, so your GPU works less-but the CPU works the same amount.

And because of this-you won['t use as much vRAM as fullscreen. So I wouldn't be able to tell if you were running out from this.

You aren't using all of your RAM and your CPU seems to stay around 70%, which is good. But if you can overclock it-I'm sure usage will go down.

I think you either have an issue with RAM-so try MemTest. When you hit a drop in FPS to 35 (which isn't even bad :lol:) you may have run out of vRAM or something happens which causes heavy CPU usage.
GPU temp is very good. But I don't know your CPU temp-but if it hits 62*C, and cool n quiet is on...
Sort by date Sort by votes
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


Well I'm pretty sure the 6300 OC can handle two 680's, but you can go 8350+680.
I haven't played BF4 since the Beta-but it was CPU heavy regardless-~60% usage. Games tend to have a much greater boost from GPU's.

There are ways of finding out if your CPU is the bottleneck though, Monitoring it's usage by logging or using a program like Performance Monitor which comes with windows 7 and 8. Or OpenHardwareMonitor.
If you just need a better GPU-then you can save money. (Also how much RAM do you have and at what speed-benchmarks show 1600->2400 RAM boost FPS by ~20FPS-[AMD is limited to 1866 or 2400 if you overclock well])

Ah I see it's in your Signature. You have 8GB, are you running out of memory from open programs? (I mean with a 660ti I was running the beta at >40FPS)

And from not getting a 8350-you can save ~190. So you can through a custom loop or AIO(x60 or H100i) or Phanteks/Noctua or just better cooling into your system.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


Why a no brainer for a 2 core addition running the same architecture? The benefits-none, if the CPU is not holding him back, and all he does is game-there is no real benefit.YET.

Cyber week is close, deals will be great soon! I can't wait! :D
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gaidax

Gaidax

Distinguished
Sep 27, 2013
1,024
1
19,965


Battlefield 4 can make use of 2 extra cores, even if architecture is the same there will be an improvement.

Case in point - is I7 better? Yes. Is it enough difference to toss extra 250$ towards it in his case? Hell no!

I also don't think investing into trying to SLI older GPU is a good idea, instead he can game just fine as it is and use that cash to land a much more powerful GPU in half a year when the prices on the new stuff drop a bit.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
L

llkashll

Honorable
Jun 13, 2013
74
0
10,660
These might help you out:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/battlefield-4-graphics-card-performance,3634-10.html

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-future-proofing-your-pc-for-next-gen

8350 is a much cheaper solution for gaming and given its resemblance to the console architectures should prove adequate for the next generation. You also get to keep your motherboard for when steamroller gets released within the next year.

I went with the 4770k because intel controllers and chipsets tend to have higher performance in RAID than equivalents on AMD boards, for gaming though the advantage over an 8350 is pretty minor.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


I didn't mention the i7...
And I didn't tell him to get it yet, but regardless-he can get a 680 used for around 300. Or he can wait till cyber monday for a kick-ass deal. It may be older, but it is still really good. Getting a new card will boost his FPS ~10, getting another card for SLI would add ~30+ for the same price.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gaidax

Gaidax

Distinguished
Sep 27, 2013
1,024
1
19,965
OP mentioned I7 and I am answering with what OP said in mind.

And bottom line is that I believe that investing into old GPU architecture is unwise right now, there is a lot of stuff going on in the GPU area in the next half a year - Mantle, DirectX update and Nvidia will most likely put out new stuff.

With all that in mind and considering that a single GTX680 is perfectly fine as it is in BF4, the most logical route for him will be just sticking FX-8350 in his rig and be done with it for now. This way is especially making sense since unlike in GPU case, there won't be any interesting high end releases in the next half a year.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


Well he doesn't have to upgrade either of them yet. He technically doesn't have to do anything. But changing a card out for a slightly better one won't do much. And who knows how much Mantle will do, nothing has been announced, and developers have no knowledge about it yet. So only time will tell :) And yes 11.2 is nice, but when will it be implemented. So in short without me continuing my blabbering, no upgrade required yet, wait for better deals.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
metalmachinist

metalmachinist

Honorable
Apr 3, 2013
221
0
10,690
In utra settings im getting 50 fps and huge drops to around 35. I was hoping an 8350 would help with keeping a constant 60 with vsync on in 1080p. My mobo is MSI 970A G46 and wont let me OC past 3.9ghz. Even when i was able to go over that to 4.377ghz it was still bottlenecking my 680.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


I doubt it's a CPU bottleneck. It's probably your RAM. You are probably running out of RAM during gameplay or just have bad RAM.
http://www.instantfundas.com/2012/03/how-to-record-cpu-and-memory-usage-over.html
You can do that to log your CPU usage during Gameplay.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Gaidax

Gaidax

Distinguished
Sep 27, 2013
1,024
1
19,965




No it won't - 8350 will give you 6-9 FPS more on average tops with that setup...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


According to who?
And if you really want it, then get the CPU-you seem very keen on getting it. Not my money-but you don't need to upgrade-if you want to-look at a R9 290x before switching chips and motherboards and SLI'ing that GPU.
Which an 8350 can xfire without problems.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
metalmachinist

metalmachinist

Honorable
Apr 3, 2013
221
0
10,690

only 4-5gb memory being used out of 8
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
T

Trapt In A Jar

Honorable
Oct 19, 2013
20
0
10,510
I'm running an 8350 + 280x in BF4 and get an average fps of 64. My friend has the 4770k and 770 and he gets an average of 69 fps. The difference (in our case) doesn't justify the extra cost.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


Well BF4 also likes faster RAM, what RAM and what frequencies are you guys using?
But 5 FPS boost from a $140 plus motherboard, not worth it. (And if you overclock your 8350-I'm sure you'll get more) (A 280x is >770-especially if you overclock that as well)
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Wenta

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


you are confusing what i said to other people and their rigs.

I asked you to log your CPU usage-and posted a screenshot of it of course.
And while playing-use task manager to see your RAM usage when you start lagging to make sure you are not running out of RAM.

Also how much vRAM does your GPU have?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom