Which router should I go with?

dragonwolf8504

Distinguished
Oct 15, 2012
186
0
18,690
I am currently looking at 1 of these 2 routers.

Price is really a max of $100.

Looking at the Asus RT-N65R: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/dual-band-wireless-n-gigabit-router-with-4-port-ethernet-switch/6639326.p?id=1218768195258&skuId=6639326&st=asus%20router&cp=1&lp=3


They have it on clearance for $71.

Or I am looking at the Netgear R6200: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/dual-band-wireless-ac-gigabit-router-with-4-port-ethernet-switch/6226495.p?id=1218720727185&skuId=6226495&st=Netgear%20Router&cp=1&lp=6

Which is on clearence for $104

I have one laptop that has an Intel AC 7260 Wireless card. Everything else is Wireless N

My old router is a Belkin N600 and doesn't seem to like the Intel 7260 card much, is fully updated on firmware, though that is over a year old with no current updates.

Current network of devices are:
1 ipad 2
2 ipad minis
1 Android phone
1 Blackberry phone
2 iphones
5 laptops, 3 have dual band wireless n, not all are connect at the same time all the time, but this is just the max network load I can think of.

I read that the Asus has Dual CPU's one for the 2.4GHZ band, the other for the 5GHZ band.

My Belkin doesn't from what I can find, and it gets extremely hot now, so hot I have a table fan blowing on it to keep it cool. So if not one of the above what would you suggest for a $100 or under router that is reliable?

The bottleneck will be my internet connection. I don't do home network stuff, so no shared drives or such, plus if I read correctly both routers can do a share setup with a hard drive if need to.

I'm trying to see if the extra cost will really be worth the extra $30 when my old one was good enough. Just getting long in the tooth and reliability is dropping.

Max internet speed is 4MB/sec or about 34Mb/ sec and really anything that can reliably keep a 100Mb/ sec is good enough for me as I don't stream much.

Thanks for all the help.
 
You have the main issue identified. Extra speed does little good if all you are doing is using the internet. Mostly you would benefit if you did a lot of streaming or backups between devices in your house.

Both these routers have 2 radio cpu one for 2.4 and one for 5. The only big difference is the support for 802.11ac and you only have 1 device that currently supports it. Then again the main advantage to 802.11ac is its ability to run faster. Since it will run can only use the new 802.11ac on the 5g band it actually will have less coverage than 802.11n on 2.4g. Of course it will have the same coverage range as running 802.11n on 5g.

Unless the belkin is defective in some way I am going to bet you will see little difference replacing it with either router. It would have to be a feature other than just basic wireless that would get you to do that. The so called 450m (which is mimo 3x3) like 802.11ac requires that your adapters in your devices have this feature. Then again actually getting 450m requires extremely interference free environment. It is dependent on sending 3 overlapping 150m data streams and hoping to extract the data on the far end.

If you can wait 802.11ac equipment should come down in price in the start of 2014. The standard for 802.11ac is only weeks away and the low prices manufacture will then release their product so the price should drop much like the dual band equipment has. I suspect this will soon be a non question since there will be little difference in the price between 802.11ac and 802.11n.