i am surrently building a new system for gaming.
i was wondering, seeing as i am already planning to water cool my cpu with an open loop i have a difficult choice to make for GPUs:
get a reference GTX 760 and an EK GTX 760 water block for about £250 in total (Maybe a bit more)
OR
Get an MSI GTX 760 Hawk which is air cooled by a twin frozer V. this would be about £220, £30 cheaper.
Which one would give a higher overclock with MSI after burner? even though the Hawk is clocked higher to start with i dont know if it allows it to be over clocked higher too...
Any suggestions for imporvements (E.g. better water blocks or GPUs) are also appreciated
Basically.would it be worth the extra risk and cost to go with the water cooling option instead of the hawk, after overclocking?
Thanks for any help/input
i was wondering, seeing as i am already planning to water cool my cpu with an open loop i have a difficult choice to make for GPUs:
get a reference GTX 760 and an EK GTX 760 water block for about £250 in total (Maybe a bit more)
OR
Get an MSI GTX 760 Hawk which is air cooled by a twin frozer V. this would be about £220, £30 cheaper.
Which one would give a higher overclock with MSI after burner? even though the Hawk is clocked higher to start with i dont know if it allows it to be over clocked higher too...
Any suggestions for imporvements (E.g. better water blocks or GPUs) are also appreciated
Basically.would it be worth the extra risk and cost to go with the water cooling option instead of the hawk, after overclocking?
Thanks for any help/input