3hunna :
rgd1101 :
because they don't have to. It not just about ghz.
the more ghz means faster processing & a low clock speed cpu will bottleneck a high end gpu & some games are not gpu hungry they are cpu whores i.e gta 4 & battle field 4 & lots of other games require quad cores
It's
not all about ghz or clock speed.
Intel's architecure and performance per core is much better than AMDs. So they don't need as high clock speed to get the same performance out of a single core as AMD does.
For example, take a bulldozer FX 4100 @ 3.6 ghz and compare it to an intel i5 3570k @3.4 ghz. There's no contest at all, the intel destroys it at absolutely everything even with lower clock speed. Why? Because the bulldozer architecture was terrible and the intel's ivy bridge is much much better, getting much more performance per core. Even if you lowered the clock speed of the intel to 2.5ghz I'm still willing to bet it would win.
However, the piledriver FX did make up for bulldozers losses. Still not up to intel in performance per core, but a very viable price;performance option, especially the 6300 / 8320.