so, I'm 99.98% sure I'm going to pick up a small-capacity WD Black to put my OS on since my SSD is driving me up the flippin' wall with the amount of crashes, BSODs, and lack of just being able to "plow through imperfect NANDs". I get anywhere from 30min to 4days of uptime before a freeze, and that's just plain-ol' unacceptable.
I've noticed that my local store has WD Blacks in a few variants - for example 500G 3.5" and 750G 2.5" (and I think they're all the same current generation).
how large of a reliability / durability difference would there be (IN A DESKTOP COMPUTER) if I were to buy a 2.5" instead of a 3.5" drive?
if I have a choice between a 2.5" 750G for $70, and a 3.5" 500G for $80, which is "preferable"?
this would only hold Win7x64, standard home/office apps, no gaming, needs to run 24/7. I have apps that run non-stop so I can't afford to have a crash or shut-down/reboot cycle every 2-3 days. my media (movies, music, pics) are on separate WD Reds.
I'd PREFER a 2.5" simply because it's smaller and easier to find a spot for it in the machine, but I'm open to suggestions and learning new facts.
I've noticed that my local store has WD Blacks in a few variants - for example 500G 3.5" and 750G 2.5" (and I think they're all the same current generation).
how large of a reliability / durability difference would there be (IN A DESKTOP COMPUTER) if I were to buy a 2.5" instead of a 3.5" drive?
if I have a choice between a 2.5" 750G for $70, and a 3.5" 500G for $80, which is "preferable"?
this would only hold Win7x64, standard home/office apps, no gaming, needs to run 24/7. I have apps that run non-stop so I can't afford to have a crash or shut-down/reboot cycle every 2-3 days. my media (movies, music, pics) are on separate WD Reds.
I'd PREFER a 2.5" simply because it's smaller and easier to find a spot for it in the machine, but I'm open to suggestions and learning new facts.