Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Is LGA 2011 better than 1150?

Tags:
  • Chipsets
  • Intel i7
  • Motherboards
Last response: in Motherboards
Share
November 24, 2013 3:55:50 PM

Im try to figure out should i get the i7-4770k or i7-4820k and there is a descent list of advantages to the 4820k. My question is the LGA2011 inferior to the 1150 or if not then is it possible that the chipsets are different and u can buy better mother boards for the 2011 than the 1150?

P.S. Which chipset would u guys recommend.

Thanks,
Sebastian

More about : lga 2011 1150

November 24, 2013 4:13:32 PM

For most things 4770k.
m
0
l
a c 207 V Motherboard
November 27, 2013 3:57:00 AM

There is NO reason to go for the 4820k above the 4770K. UNLESS you have a use for more PCI-e lanes, which I can not see happening since 1150 already can do tri GPU cards with no effort.
m
0
l
Related resources
November 27, 2013 7:17:37 AM

If you are going to be doing triple or quadruple graphics card configurations there will be a benefit to have lga 2011.
m
0
l

Best solution

a b V Motherboard
November 27, 2013 7:20:57 AM

Yep in a single or dual GPU configuration there is no reason whatsoever to go with a 2011 socket, Unless you plan to do a lot of video rendering and need 64 gb of memory, that would honestly be the only reason I would consider 2011 a viable option.
Share
November 27, 2013 8:59:55 PM

Supahos said:
Yep in a single or dual GPU configuration there is no reason whatsoever to go with a 2011 socket, Unless you plan to do a lot of video rendering and need 64 gb of memory, that would honestly be the only reason I would consider 2011 a viable option.


The thing is i hear that answer a lot that only if u need 4 way sli does 2011 make sense but from what ive see the 4820k has a lot more better features then the 4770k and the argument u made is not a reason why NOT to go with 2011 or 4820.

• 22 nm Ivy Bridge-E
• 10MB L3 Cache
• 130W
• Max Memory Size 64 GB
• Clock Speed 3.7 GHz / Turbo Boost up to 3.9 GHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 59.7BG/s
Launched Q3'13
# of Memory Channels 4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes 40
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) YES

VS

• Clock Speed 3.5 GHz / Turbo Boost up to 3.9 GHz
• Max Memory Size 32 GB
• Intel Wireless Display
• Instruction Set: SSE 4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0

22 mm Haswell 84W
Max Memory Bandwidth 25.6GB/s
Launched Q2'13
# of Memory Channels 2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes 16
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) NO
for the 4770 oh and 2 GB less L3 mem.
m
0
l
December 4, 2013 10:07:11 AM

16bit said:
If you are going to be doing triple or quadruple graphics card configurations there will be a benefit to have lga 2011.


not really. considering its already been shown that 8x vs 16x in multi card configs doesn't make much of a difference if any at all. (this is assuming he plans on buying a 1150 board that accommodates SLI properly w/ a PLX chip)

m
0
l
December 4, 2013 10:08:57 AM

klepp0906 said:
16bit said:
If you are going to be doing triple or quadruple graphics card configurations there will be a benefit to have lga 2011.


not really. considering its already been shown that 8x vs 16x in multi card configs doesn't make much of a difference if any at all. (this is assuming he plans on buying a 1150 board that accommodates SLI properly w/ a PLX chip)



its an 8x 8x with two graphics cards but and 8x 4x 4x with three graphics cards on 1150.
m
0
l
December 4, 2013 10:11:00 AM

sebastian869 said:
Supahos said:
Yep in a single or dual GPU configuration there is no reason whatsoever to go with a 2011 socket, Unless you plan to do a lot of video rendering and need 64 gb of memory, that would honestly be the only reason I would consider 2011 a viable option.


The thing is i hear that answer a lot that only if u need 4 way sli does 2011 make sense but from what ive see the 4820k has a lot more better features then the 4770k and the argument u made is not a reason why NOT to go with 2011 or 4820.

• 22 nm Ivy Bridge-E
• 10MB L3 Cache
• 130W
• Max Memory Size 64 GB
• Clock Speed 3.7 GHz / Turbo Boost up to 3.9 GHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 59.7BG/s
Launched Q3'13
# of Memory Channels 4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes 40
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) YES

VS

• Clock Speed 3.5 GHz / Turbo Boost up to 3.9 GHz
• Max Memory Size 32 GB
• Intel Wireless Display
• Instruction Set: SSE 4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0

22 mm Haswell 84W
Max Memory Bandwidth 25.6GB/s
Launched Q2'13
# of Memory Channels 2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes 16
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) NO
for the 4770 oh and 2 GB less L3 mem.


The haswell chip is faster clock for clock for starters. the z87 platform also offers a lot of nice perks as opposed to the older chipset. I wont lie, its a close call, but I would personally choose the 1150 and it will also save you a few bucks on the cpu end of things. If you are gonna use tri sli + you will obviously need a board w/ a PLX chip due to the haswells pci lanes (or lack thereof)
m
0
l
December 4, 2013 11:08:47 AM

Imo the x79 is more hardcore and is used for semi servers. Its the best consumer platform you can get. So, x79 > z87.
But it costs a lot more and doesn't give much benefit unless you need 8 slots of ram, 12 threads, and 3+ gpu's
m
0
l
December 4, 2013 11:20:36 AM

theProbe said:
Imo the x79 is more hardcore and is used for semi servers. Its the best consumer platform you can get. So, x79 > z87.
But it costs a lot more and doesn't give much benefit unless you need 8 slots of ram, 12 threads, and 3+ gpu's


All depends what your using it for. Server wise if u need a ton of ram sure, or professional workstation u can't beat it... But the z87 is more mainstream and has all the newest tech/features.

For what you gain (basically 2 more cores) in comparison to what you lose... It's not even close to an arguement. Cost of chips is just silly.

I wasted money on an ivy e and I will never do that again. Compared to my buddies new haswell rig all I feel like I gained was whatever bragging rights come with spending 2x as much for a board and chip :p 

To each their own. Pick a board from each chipset, and then go over the features each platform provides. Assuming nothing is a deal breaker on either side, bring the cost Into the equation levied against how long u intend to keep them both, and you will have your answer. (This is of assuming you aren't Keanu reeves in disguise and money is an option for you)

m
0
l
December 5, 2013 10:50:57 PM


do u guys hyper thereading even makes a difference these days for games and first person shooters in particular (or will it in the near future)?
thx for all the help
m
0
l
December 5, 2013 10:53:05 PM

BTW., if i got with the 4770k whats the best mobo/chipset to go with
(ive always gone w/asus, cant complain)
m
0
l
December 6, 2013 2:41:28 PM

sebastian869 said:
BTW., if i got with the 4770k whats the best mobo/chipset to go with
(ive always gone w/asus, cant complain)

Z87 chipset ASUS board.
m
0
l
!