should I get mw3 or bfbc2?

Mr mustard

Honorable
Nov 25, 2013
1
0
10,510
Guys should I buy cod modern warfare 3 or battlefield bad company 2 for pc?
I have Windows xp and I know both of them run on xp
How much diskspace do they take up?
They are both the same price in ebgames Australia ($28)
:)
 
Solution
They both have a decent single player campaign.

Multi player however is completely different.

MW3 is typical first person shooter just like you know it from any previous Call of Duty games. Quick fights on small maps. Not saying it's bad, but it's very repetitive.

Bad Company 2 on the other hand has big massive maps with lots of vehicles such as tanks, planes, boats etc. It feels a lot more open world while MW3 feels like a small closed off area that you're fighting in without any vehicles.

It's up to you to decide what you prefer more.

Ajith Lal

Honorable
Aug 28, 2013
63
0
10,660


well , modern warfare series has a good storyline!! I dont knw abt battlefield Bad company !!
 

GhosT_Hv

Honorable
Nov 9, 2013
726
1
11,360
If you've played the modern warfare 1 and 2 the go for modern warfare 3,
according to my experience MW3 is much better than BFBC2.
MW3 requires around 15GB of disk space and BFBC2 requires around 10GB of disk space.
 

Ajith Lal

Honorable
Aug 28, 2013
63
0
10,660


Graphics doesn't matter if the game is good!!
 

GhosT_Hv

Honorable
Nov 9, 2013
726
1
11,360


Ajith have got the point.
:D
Sahi hai boss.
 


I'm one of those people who choose a game based on gameplay. U will find Limbo,Mark of the Ninja,Portal, Portal 2 in my Steam account. And i also play Skyrim maxed out on my PC.
MW3- what should i say about this , it was Activision's formula of making money

 

Metro1337

Honorable
Nov 25, 2013
11
0
10,510
Seriously, go for BC2. I haven't played MW3 since 6 months while I'm still playing BC2, BUT you should be aware of that there are no official servers anymore.

MW3 is the worst game I have played so far.
 

Pummel

Honorable
Nov 9, 2013
113
0
10,710
They both have a decent single player campaign.

Multi player however is completely different.

MW3 is typical first person shooter just like you know it from any previous Call of Duty games. Quick fights on small maps. Not saying it's bad, but it's very repetitive.

Bad Company 2 on the other hand has big massive maps with lots of vehicles such as tanks, planes, boats etc. It feels a lot more open world while MW3 feels like a small closed off area that you're fighting in without any vehicles.

It's up to you to decide what you prefer more.
 
Solution