Solved

FX 8100 vs FX 6100 vs FX 6300

Which is the better CPU? Primarily for gaming, but will also obviously use it for normal pc stuff.
4 answers Last reply Best Answer
More about 8100 6100 6300
  1. fx8320 is better than all of those.

    fx8100 and 6100 are older bulldozer cpus and 6300 is new but it has one less module (two less cores).
    fx6300 would be a budget choice(over fx6100) if cpu fund is limited.
  2. Fx 6300 !
    because most of the new gen games use only 6 cores as they are sufficient. For normal computation it depends on your uses. If you are heavy multitask-er then go for 8100.

    Instead of 6300 and 8100 i will recommend to go for 6350 and 8300or8350.
  3. If you can afford, get a 8320.
    Just make sure you stay away from the X100 series because they are crap.
  4. Best answer
    6300, if you can afford 8320 and your mobo supports it then 8320.
    fx 6100 and 8100 and and anything from AMD with the code name -100 or -150 anything that has that one as its second digit uses Bulldozer architecture, I love AMD but we should accpet those CPUs were a flop, those CPUs which have -300 -320 -350 enjoy Pile driver architecture, which is far better than Bulldozer architecture. So no wonder fx 6300 beats 8100 easily, also look here http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-FX-8100-vs-AMD-FX-6300
    Don't forget to close the post, if you feel you have no other questions
Ask a new question

Read More

Gaming AMD CPUs