Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

FX 8100 vs FX 6100 vs FX 6300

Last response: in CPUs
Share
November 28, 2013 12:12:14 AM

Which is the better CPU? Primarily for gaming, but will also obviously use it for normal pc stuff.

More about : 8100 6100 6300

a b 4 Gaming
a b À AMD
a c 83 à CPUs
November 28, 2013 12:17:00 AM

fx8320 is better than all of those.

fx8100 and 6100 are older bulldozer cpus and 6300 is new but it has one less module (two less cores).
fx6300 would be a budget choice(over fx6100) if cpu fund is limited.
m
0
l
November 28, 2013 12:19:56 AM

Fx 6300 !
because most of the new gen games use only 6 cores as they are sufficient. For normal computation it depends on your uses. If you are heavy multitask-er then go for 8100.

Instead of 6300 and 8100 i will recommend to go for 6350 and 8300or8350.
m
0
l
Related resources
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
a b à CPUs
November 28, 2013 12:22:49 AM

If you can afford, get a 8320.
Just make sure you stay away from the X100 series because they are crap.
m
0
l

Best solution

a b 4 Gaming
a b À AMD
a b à CPUs
November 28, 2013 1:19:54 AM

6300, if you can afford 8320 and your mobo supports it then 8320.
fx 6100 and 8100 and and anything from AMD with the code name -100 or -150 anything that has that one as its second digit uses Bulldozer architecture, I love AMD but we should accpet those CPUs were a flop, those CPUs which have -300 -320 -350 enjoy Pile driver architecture, which is far better than Bulldozer architecture. So no wonder fx 6300 beats 8100 easily, also look here http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-FX-8100-vs-AMD-FX-6300
Don't forget to close the post, if you feel you have no other questions
Share
!