First, I would like to get out of the way that I already have a mobo for this build, so I'm not considering outside of LGA 2011 even though this is primarily for gaming.
At first I was going to just get a 4820k since it's right around the same performance/price of a 4770k. But then I noticed that the older generation 6 core (3930k) was marked down a good chunk.
I'll be running a dual monitor setup with a GTX 780, and I plan to have two seperate games running at once, on a fairly regular basis.
Now I know most people say an i7 is overkill for gaming anyway, but then I got to thinking that maybe with two games running at once (and some other light background tasks) maybe a 6 core could make a difference? For an actual example, I might want to run BF4 on one screen with WoW in the other, or maybe Civ 5.
If so, do you think being the previous generation is too much of a negative? Only real difference I see is that the single core performance is lower and the RAM speed is 1600 vs 1866. I just don't really know if that will matter for what I'll be doing so I figured I'd ask for some input!
Thanks
At first I was going to just get a 4820k since it's right around the same performance/price of a 4770k. But then I noticed that the older generation 6 core (3930k) was marked down a good chunk.
I'll be running a dual monitor setup with a GTX 780, and I plan to have two seperate games running at once, on a fairly regular basis.
Now I know most people say an i7 is overkill for gaming anyway, but then I got to thinking that maybe with two games running at once (and some other light background tasks) maybe a 6 core could make a difference? For an actual example, I might want to run BF4 on one screen with WoW in the other, or maybe Civ 5.
If so, do you think being the previous generation is too much of a negative? Only real difference I see is that the single core performance is lower and the RAM speed is 1600 vs 1866. I just don't really know if that will matter for what I'll be doing so I figured I'd ask for some input!
Thanks