Is Unigine Valley Reporting Core Clock speeds Correctly?

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160
Hello Everyone, Ill try and make this Quick -

Specs-
EVGA GTX 760 w/ACX (Base Clock 980) (Boost 1033)
Driver Version - v331.82
MSI Afterburner - v2.3.1 (Now v3.0.0 BETA17)
Valley Benchmark v1.0 (DX11/Ultra/x2AA)
Windows 7 64
Core i5 4670k (Stock for now)

Woke up today and thought, Ill see how much better this 760 is than my Old 660/550TI

Anyway. Upon running valley benchmark, I found that according to valley, my Core clock was a constant 1202Mhz. Im thinking, thats a little high even for GPU Boost 2.0. I enter into MSI Afterburner to find my card is leveling out at 1097Mhz @ 67C

What Gives xD ?

Edit- Today is the first time Ive used Valley.....The Music...Zmog
 
Solution


In this case, I'd be inclinded to believe Afterburner. Valley does, after all, report my 290 temperature at 1.8 million degrees C.

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160


Updated and ran the Benchmark. Afterburner is still reporting 1097 while Valley is showing 1202. Im beginning to wonder if Valley supports 700 Series. Not the biggest problem in the world. Im just simply using it for Stability and Benchmark testing. Nice to have a new version of Afterburner though xD
 

benjii

Distinguished
Oct 29, 2010
458
0
19,160


In this case, I'd be inclinded to believe Afterburner. Valley does, after all, report my 290 temperature at 1.8 million degrees C.
 
Solution

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160


Yep lol. I would save a SS of that... Its priceless
 

Vellinious

Honorable
Dec 3, 2013
984
2
11,360


Mine isn't showing 1202...



And goes up or down, depending on how much I set the GPU offset to. It does however, register roughly 140mhz high.
 

klepp0906

Distinguished
Apr 29, 2013
150
0
18,710
First problem is people telling you afterburner has anything to do with it... Cause it doesn't. Fwiw my 290xs show up at the proper clocks but they show as a cool and ideal 0c which I wish was the case.

Driver bug imo