The cpu hierarchy should be a list, instead of in groups

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Sort by date Sort by votes
JOOK-D

JOOK-D

Dignified
Aug 28, 2013
3,910
0
15,960
I don't agree with it anyway, some are better at other things than others. You'd have to get some set form of testing/benchmarking that could potentially be biased either way. Not all are designed to do the same thing either and will perform differently depending on the task/game.

It's difficult to quantify, especially between brands and CPU families. Hence why I just avoid it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Ags1

Ags1

Honorable
Apr 26, 2012
255
0
10,790
290 equal to a 290X is about right from the reviews I've read :)

Joking .... basically, the CPU and GPU pages oversimplify to the point of being pretty useless.

Take the actual CPI recommendations - how can the FX6300 manage an honorable mention, but the FX8320 does not?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
T

tracker45

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2012
409
0
18,790


In fact it puts it lower than that, it puts it in a separate group altogether.

Based on the hierarchy, the 8320 is equivalent to

Core i7-980, -970, -960
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom