GeForce GTX680 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2GB

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
A

art3d

Honorable
Dec 27, 2013
3
0
10,510
I would like to know which card is better for 3D workstation (3DMax, Vray & Vray RT)
the K2000 2GB or the GTX680 4GB ?

Thanks!

 
Solution
O
The GTX 680 will be intentionally crippled for certain workstation applications. E.g. FP64 performance cut down to something like 1/8th of what the chip is actually capable of. The Quadro card probably also features things like ECC memory, which means it's less likely to have errors, etc. for when accuracy is a must.

In any case, AFAIK Nvidia gaming cards suck at things like compute, so you'd be better off with an AMD card or professional-oriented (Quadro, Firepro) card, which will have optimized drivers etc.

Or a Titan, which apparently isn't too hobbled.
Sort by date Sort by votes
A

art3d

Honorable
Dec 27, 2013
3
0
10,510
I would like to know which card is better for 3D workstation (3DMax, Vray & Vray RT)
Quadro K2000 2GB or GTX680 4GB ?

I know that for cad and stuff like photoshop & preimere or even 3D (but only for viewport) the K2000 is excellent, but what about Vray and GPU acculturate.
does the GTX 680 will faster?

Thanks!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
O

Omegaclawe

Honorable
Sep 28, 2013
156
0
10,710
The GTX 680 will be intentionally crippled for certain workstation applications. E.g. FP64 performance cut down to something like 1/8th of what the chip is actually capable of. The Quadro card probably also features things like ECC memory, which means it's less likely to have errors, etc. for when accuracy is a must.

In any case, AFAIK Nvidia gaming cards suck at things like compute, so you'd be better off with an AMD card or professional-oriented (Quadro, Firepro) card, which will have optimized drivers etc.

Or a Titan, which apparently isn't too hobbled.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Solution
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom