Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

GeForce GTX680 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2GB

Tags:
  • Workstations
  • Quadro
  • Nvidia
  • Geforce
  • Graphics
  • 3D
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
December 27, 2013 10:28:03 AM

I would like to know which card is better for 3D workstation (3DMax, Vray & Vray RT)
the K2000 2GB or the GTX680 4GB ?

Thanks!

More about : geforce gtx680 4gb nvidia quadro k2000 2gb

December 27, 2013 1:33:12 PM

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2GB
m
0
l
December 27, 2013 4:29:14 PM

can I get more detail answer, why you think is better ?

m
0
l
Related resources
December 28, 2013 2:39:30 AM

I would like to know which card is better for 3D workstation (3DMax, Vray & Vray RT)
Quadro K2000 2GB or GTX680 4GB ?

I know that for cad and stuff like photoshop & preimere or even 3D (but only for viewport) the K2000 is excellent, but what about Vray and GPU acculturate.
does the GTX 680 will faster?

Thanks!
m
0
l

Best solution

December 28, 2013 2:57:17 AM

The GTX 680 will be intentionally crippled for certain workstation applications. E.g. FP64 performance cut down to something like 1/8th of what the chip is actually capable of. The Quadro card probably also features things like ECC memory, which means it's less likely to have errors, etc. for when accuracy is a must.

In any case, AFAIK Nvidia gaming cards suck at things like compute, so you'd be better off with an AMD card or professional-oriented (Quadro, Firepro) card, which will have optimized drivers etc.

Or a Titan, which apparently isn't too hobbled.
Share
!