Is it worth get ing the gigabyte GeForce GTX 760 OC 4GB?

Rextangalle

Honorable
Nov 13, 2013
36
0
10,530
I'm looking at buying the Gigabyte GTX 760 OC 4GB but I'm unsure if it's the right choice for high end gaming and video and photo editing? I have a budget of $370. I also live in Australia.
 
Solution
It depends on the game, however many newer games ie. Arkham Origins, BF4 etc... They will use almost exactly 2GB of vram at ultra, sometimes even more. If your card doesn't have the vram, it will only use what it has, however if you do ultra settings in BF with a higher occlusion and more AA, you will need the extra vram. It's not just about resolution, here is a little bit outdated video from linus of linutechtips to explain the basics though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBN5MNpYWlY

Also in this, is the specs of each gpu you are considering. Core architecture, architecture evolution as some chips are redesigned in later models, shading processors, memory bandwidth etc etc. Even all of these details and how they interact with your...

smyler

Honorable
Dec 30, 2013
16
0
10,520
It depends on the game, however many newer games ie. Arkham Origins, BF4 etc... They will use almost exactly 2GB of vram at ultra, sometimes even more. If your card doesn't have the vram, it will only use what it has, however if you do ultra settings in BF with a higher occlusion and more AA, you will need the extra vram. It's not just about resolution, here is a little bit outdated video from linus of linutechtips to explain the basics though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBN5MNpYWlY

Also in this, is the specs of each gpu you are considering. Core architecture, architecture evolution as some chips are redesigned in later models, shading processors, memory bandwidth etc etc. Even all of these details and how they interact with your MB and other components. I would suggest in the current generation of cards, getting a 760 or above with at least 2gb of vram, though if it were me I'd chose 4 and personally I am going with the 770 4gb. The amount of shadders, for me at the price point is the seller. Also, clock speeds and such do matter sometimes, however mostly not so much. Quality over quantity. Look at AMD cpu's, they are decent no doubt, however per core against intel comparable cpu's they loose, because the single cores are usually 20-30% slower than one core of an intel. I bring that up as a close reference to gpu's. Also, the gpu is dependant like I said on what application you are using it for. Keep these tips in mind, and try not to listen to what every poster says on here, I have read these forums for quite some time now, and never posted, however I am tired of the misleading responses with uninformative lines of bable.

In the price point you seem to have, go with the 760 4GB for maybe 30 extra bucks, and I'm sure you will be pleased and future proofed.
 
Solution

smyler

Honorable
Dec 30, 2013
16
0
10,520
Btw, I didn't properly read your price point. I thought it was lower than I now see. Go with either a 770 2gb, the extra 400 or so shaders will outweigh the vram, and also if you're willing to spend a few dollars extra or whatever aussie money is called, get either a gigabyte 770 4gb for 389.99 from amazon, or the pny 770 4gb for 377.99 from amazon. The pny has more of a rear IO exhaust than the gigabyte so it will stay cooler, and the gigabyte has higher clocks. I have never used either, however it's easily researchable on google to find the gigabyte has really good temps even with the open exhaust into the case. PNY has a lifetime warranty by the way. Good luck with your find.

Links btw:
Gigabyte 770 4gb ... http://www.amazon.com/Gigabyte-GDDR5-4GB-WINDFORCE-Graphics-GV-N770OC-4GD/dp/B00CU9GOAO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1388389286&sr=8-1&keywords=770+4gb
PNY 770 4gb ... http://www.amazon.com/PNY-Enthusiast-Edition-Graphics-VCGGTX7704XPB-OC/dp/B00F6EAN7U/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1388389346&sr=8-5&keywords=770+4gb

evga 760 4gb ... http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-GTX760-Dual-Link-04G-P4-3768-KR/dp/B00E0N49C8/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1388389373&sr=8-2&keywords=760+4gb
(you dont need the super clock btw, compare clocks on this for 20 bucks less than stated above)
 

smyler

Honorable
Dec 30, 2013
16
0
10,520
As I stated, resolution is not the only factor. I don't spend almost 400 bucks knowing I'll have to sacrifice image quality because I chose to spend a few less on the components. Talk about performance to value, even that link states that you have to lower settings for it to be feasible to play with less vram in bf4. When you turn up things like AA, AF, and AO especially in BF's frostbite and physx demanding games, you need the extra vram to buffer the frames, because the amount of data in each pixel is just that much more intesive for the gpu to compute. It's alot more complicated than just saying vram this vram that, he will waste his money if he either A) gets a 2gb card with the newer game engines coming within the next 3 quarters, or B) spends a few dollars less whilst he could have spent a few more to future proof the system and save money.

The complexity of gpu's, not to mention how they interact with the system it's built into and interacts with, is much more than you are presenting. Please don't mislead this guy to win some e-argument, you are wrong and he will most certainly get value out of spending the money for the extra vram. Not to mention it's not as easy to get components in Aus as in other countries, they are down under and I'm sure he doesn't want to wait after being disappointed =)