I recently upgraded to
Fx 8350
8 gig ddr3 1600mhz ram
I have a gtx 650 ti with 1 gig gddr5 ram.
I want to upgrade the card and known that Cuda cores make a huge difference in my encoding.
I ran a little test and using the Mercury engine it shot my cpu to around 65 c and rendered forever vs a render with Cuda engine which kept the cpu around 52c and tool around 1/4 the time.
So how do the new r7 and r9 amd cards hold up in premiere pro?
I ask because I returned a lower end 6000 series amd card which did nothing at all to accelerate real time effects in premiere and did not see any encoding increases.
Strangely other programs like cyberlink love amd cards.. But i love premier an that's what I use.
I game but that isn't my real reason to upgrade. I a future proof solution that will play games and allow me to have a better experience with premiere pro through at least the second half of 2015.
Fx 8350
8 gig ddr3 1600mhz ram
I have a gtx 650 ti with 1 gig gddr5 ram.
I want to upgrade the card and known that Cuda cores make a huge difference in my encoding.
I ran a little test and using the Mercury engine it shot my cpu to around 65 c and rendered forever vs a render with Cuda engine which kept the cpu around 52c and tool around 1/4 the time.
So how do the new r7 and r9 amd cards hold up in premiere pro?
I ask because I returned a lower end 6000 series amd card which did nothing at all to accelerate real time effects in premiere and did not see any encoding increases.
Strangely other programs like cyberlink love amd cards.. But i love premier an that's what I use.
I game but that isn't my real reason to upgrade. I a future proof solution that will play games and allow me to have a better experience with premiere pro through at least the second half of 2015.