AMD Athlon II X4 760k 3.8GHz vs. AMD FX-4300 Vishera 3.8GHz

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jageman

Honorable
Jan 8, 2014
8
0
10,510
Both cpus cost the same on newegg right now. Which is the better buy? I need to get a new cpu and motherboard for $160.
 
Solution


FX 4300 is great for games
FX 4300 -6610 points .3D Mark 11 Phisics , gamers benchmark
i5 4670 -6830 points
FX 8350 - 6880 points
FX 6300 - 6080 points
Athlon X4 760K - 3620 points

i gueee this gamers test focuses on 4 cores and more MHz

CTurbo

Pizza Monster
Moderator
They are pretty similar in performance both at stock speeds and overclocked.

The 760k is on the fm2/fm2+ socket. The biggest thing in it's favor is the fm2 socket has the best features/price on the market. The biggest con is there isn't a very good upgrade path. Going fm2+ will allow for a Kaveri upgrade, but don't expect any hard core cpus to be released on it.

The FX 4300 is on the slowly dying AM3+ socket that currently has a pretty good upgrade path, but doesn't appear to be getting any real significant new releases. There should at least be one more refresh before it's put to bed for good though.
 

St0rm_KILL3r

Honorable
Sep 14, 2013
1,086
0
11,960
It's a tough answer, they both are really equall to each other. But I think fx 4300 will be better if you wan't to overclock otherwise they are either will be good.
But if you can increase your budget a bit fx 6300 can also be a good choice.
 

Jageman

Honorable
Jan 8, 2014
8
0
10,510
I already have a Radeon HD 7750 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 so I want to get something that will work well with it. Would getting a motherboard with a PCI-E 3.0 slot be worth it?
 

St0rm_KILL3r

Honorable
Sep 14, 2013
1,086
0
11,960


It will be good for future upgrade. But first spend more on cpu as there's not much noticable difference between pci-e 2.0 and 3.0 slot.
 

whitecat

Honorable


AMD mobo with pci-e 3.0 ?! $200 by Asus .No need .

Consider FX 4300 and MSI 970A-G43 = $179
FX 4300 has 2x better score than Athlon II X4 760k in 3D Mark 11 Physics test .But if the budget doesnt allow , just get 760K .
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator
760k isn't that great of a chip really. It is OK, but the lack of L3 cache hurts it in games. Clock for clock, a Phenom II 965 is actually faster. Other than clock speed, a 750k and 760k are identical architecture. Trinity and Richland are identical on the CPU side of things. The only difference between the two were the GPU side on the APU's.
 

CTurbo

Pizza Monster
Moderator
Richland overclocks a lot better than Trinity. The 760k vs the 750k is a great example. The 6800k vs the 5800k is another. The 750k and 5800k were not very good overclockers, but the 760k and 6800k are. I can run my 6800k completely stable @ 4.7ghz x 4 with the smallest voltage bump. The 760k should be able to match that pretty easily.

Besides all that, the fm2+ motherboards have awesome standard features for the price.
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator


Average overclock is a very insignificant amount.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_x4_750k/ - 4496mhz
http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_x4_760k/ - 4471mhz
 

Jageman

Honorable
Jan 8, 2014
8
0
10,510
Unless there's anything I'm missing my best option is a FX-4300 with a MSI 970A-G43 and a Rosewill Galaxy-01 Black Gaming ATX Mid Tower.

I don't really plan on overclocking at all because I have little experience in that area.

Thanks for the advice.
 

ohyouknow

Distinguished
Nov 18, 2011
957
0
19,160
I agree with Turbo here. A88X chipset on FM2+ is more attractive IMO. Also, stay away from MSI boards. From my experience and friends who have tried them, they have a worse hit rate than asrock, gigabyte, Asus. Good Luck.
 

whitecat

Honorable


FX 4300 is great for games
FX 4300 -6610 points .3D Mark 11 Phisics , gamers benchmark
i5 4670 -6830 points
FX 8350 - 6880 points
FX 6300 - 6080 points
Athlon X4 760K - 3620 points

i gueee this gamers test focuses on 4 cores and more MHz
 
Solution
Status
Not open for further replies.