GTX 660 2GB overkill for a 1440x900 resolution?

TheDoctorIsIn

Honorable
Jan 9, 2014
30
0
10,540
The GPU isn't as important towards the resolution as much as the CPU is, but I think the 660 would be a nice choice, depending on the games you play. If you want, you can head over to systemrequirementslab to see if the 660 would be a good choice for the game you want
 

chrisso

Honorable
Nov 17, 2013
1,333
0
11,660
Your 660 is capable of running good frame rates at 1080p, at reasonable settings. Using a lower deff monitor
will just lower the picture quality. That is a cheap monitor,not really aimed at gaming.
Dont get me wrong, if you have some years old antique now or are using a small flat screen tv, this asus will be better, but try and find a few more dollars for something better.
 


you got it completely backwards, the cpu has minimal affect on processing graphics at higher resolution, its pretty much ALL on the GPU. but a gtx660 will run games from medium-ultra detail at 1080p depending on game.
 


with skyrim your cpu is going to be the limiting factor, a gtx660 will run it on ultra at 60 fps solid, that cpu wont, only an intel cpu can maintain 60fps solid on that game. bf4 you should run on medium - high at 1080p, may have to reduce AA if you want really high fps, your cpu should be ok for that game, however the game is buggy as hell and often doesnt run well on the highest end systems.
 

bmb2296

Honorable
Dec 24, 2013
16
0
10,510

But why would my CPU be limiting for Skyrim? not that im saying your wrong its just its a 6 core running at 3.5GHz ive watched others run my exact same build for that game with graphic mods consistently at 50+ FPS