Hi, everyone.
I've recently inherited an HP/Compaq Presario SR1619UK desktop PC, approx vintage early 2006. It has an AMD Athlon 64-bit 3200+ CPU, running at 2 Ghz; currently 1 Gb of RAM, shortly to become 3 Gb; and for graphics, it has the old ATI Radeon Xpress 200 integrated chipset.....and is running the 32-bit version of Windows XP Home Edition, 2003.
Now, I'm in my early 50's, and consequently, my computing career started off with the good old Commodore 64; still, to my mind, the best home computer OF the early 1980's. I've been using a Dell Inspiron laptop until very recently, which I had for nearly 10 years, but it was developing MAJOR issues with the USBs..! I've only become interested in the 'techie' side of things in recent months, so please bear with me...I'm still a bit new at this.
I've been reading your forums about graphics cards and the like for a few hours earlier this evening, and I'm getting the impression that the Xpress 200 chipset is NOT that reliable. Now, this computer has been sitting idle (unused) for the last five years or so, which means it probably hasn't had that much use. My question to you experts out there is this:-
IF the chipset SHOULD fail (for whatever reason), is it possible to disable it in the BIOS, and hence install a halfway-decent graphics card into one of my 3 spare PCI-Express slots...and drive my graphics that way?
Any advice from ANYBODY on the site would be much appreciated. I have somewhat of a limited income, so I don't want to go mad; bear in mind that I do NOT want this for gaming, just good-quality photo-editing (photography being my main hobby) so we're talking mainly about static screenwork here...primarily Adobe's CreativeSuite. I just want a serviceable, low to mid-range card (I understand these things CAN go up to some SILLY prices!); my budget is £100UK, or approximately $160US.
Who can give a tech-savvy 'old codger' some help with this?
I've recently inherited an HP/Compaq Presario SR1619UK desktop PC, approx vintage early 2006. It has an AMD Athlon 64-bit 3200+ CPU, running at 2 Ghz; currently 1 Gb of RAM, shortly to become 3 Gb; and for graphics, it has the old ATI Radeon Xpress 200 integrated chipset.....and is running the 32-bit version of Windows XP Home Edition, 2003.
Now, I'm in my early 50's, and consequently, my computing career started off with the good old Commodore 64; still, to my mind, the best home computer OF the early 1980's. I've been using a Dell Inspiron laptop until very recently, which I had for nearly 10 years, but it was developing MAJOR issues with the USBs..! I've only become interested in the 'techie' side of things in recent months, so please bear with me...I'm still a bit new at this.
I've been reading your forums about graphics cards and the like for a few hours earlier this evening, and I'm getting the impression that the Xpress 200 chipset is NOT that reliable. Now, this computer has been sitting idle (unused) for the last five years or so, which means it probably hasn't had that much use. My question to you experts out there is this:-
IF the chipset SHOULD fail (for whatever reason), is it possible to disable it in the BIOS, and hence install a halfway-decent graphics card into one of my 3 spare PCI-Express slots...and drive my graphics that way?
Any advice from ANYBODY on the site would be much appreciated. I have somewhat of a limited income, so I don't want to go mad; bear in mind that I do NOT want this for gaming, just good-quality photo-editing (photography being my main hobby) so we're talking mainly about static screenwork here...primarily Adobe's CreativeSuite. I just want a serviceable, low to mid-range card (I understand these things CAN go up to some SILLY prices!); my budget is £100UK, or approximately $160US.
Who can give a tech-savvy 'old codger' some help with this?