Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

prime 95 bench mark

Last response: in Systems
Share
January 18, 2014 4:22:29 PM

Hi, I just built a core i5 4570 rig. I have run memtest and prime 95 while using HWMonitor to monitor things. I am not familiar with these programs and could use a little help with what I am looking at. Here is prime 95 bench mark mode.
[Sat Jan 18 14:23:39 2014]
Self-test 12K passed!
Self-test 12K passed!
Self-test 12K passed!
Self-test 12K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 14:38:47 2014]
Self-test 8K passed!
Self-test 8K passed!
Self-test 8K passed!
Self-test 8K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 14:53:50 2014]
Self-test 16K passed!
Self-test 16K passed!
Self-test 16K passed!
Self-test 16K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 15:08:53 2014]
Self-test 10K passed!
Self-test 10K passed!
Self-test 10K passed!
Self-test 10K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 15:24:01 2014]
Self-test 12K passed!
Self-test 12K passed!
Self-test 12K passed!
Self-test 12K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 15:39:03 2014]
Self-test 8K passed!
Self-test 8K passed!
Self-test 8K passed!
Self-test 8K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 16:58:10 2014]
Self-test 16K passed!
Self-test 16K passed!
Self-test 16K passed!
Self-test 16K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 17:13:13 2014]
Self-test 10K passed!
Self-test 10K passed!
Self-test 10K passed!
Self-test 10K passed!
[Sat Jan 18 17:53:44 2014]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/report_benchmarks
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4570 CPU @ 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3163.80 MHz, 4 cores
CPU features: Prefetch, SSE, SSE2, SSE4, AVX, FMA
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB, L3 cache size: 6 MB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 64-bit version 27.9, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 768K FFT length: 3.823 ms., avg: 3.881 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 4.730 ms., avg: 4.776 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 5.385 ms., avg: 5.402 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 6.759 ms., avg: 6.849 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 8.270 ms., avg: 8.292 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 9.904 ms., avg: 10.079 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 11.014 ms., avg: 11.141 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 14.306 ms., avg: 14.425 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 17.356 ms., avg: 17.424 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 20.880 ms., avg: 20.923 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 23.290 ms., avg: 23.428 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 30.710 ms., avg: 30.780 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 36.610 ms., avg: 36.743 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 43.678 ms., avg: 43.761 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 51.108 ms., avg: 51.227 ms.
Timing FFTs using 2 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 2.047 ms., avg: 2.077 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 2.544 ms., avg: 2.571 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 2.782 ms., avg: 2.844 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 3.606 ms., avg: 3.627 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 4.380 ms., avg: 4.419 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 5.178 ms., avg: 5.214 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 5.830 ms., avg: 5.869 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 7.580 ms., avg: 7.614 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 9.171 ms., avg: 9.201 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 10.974 ms., avg: 11.030 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 12.360 ms., avg: 12.396 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 16.113 ms., avg: 16.171 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 19.320 ms., avg: 19.361 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 22.924 ms., avg: 23.024 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 26.965 ms., avg: 27.044 ms.
Timing FFTs using 3 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 1.434 ms., avg: 1.503 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 1.833 ms., avg: 1.875 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 2.042 ms., avg: 2.155 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 2.701 ms., avg: 2.736 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 3.294 ms., avg: 3.327 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 3.908 ms., avg: 3.945 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 4.492 ms., avg: 4.531 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 5.804 ms., avg: 5.926 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 7.057 ms., avg: 7.110 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 8.484 ms., avg: 8.544 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 9.697 ms., avg: 9.769 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 12.429 ms., avg: 12.459 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 14.945 ms., avg: 14.981 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 17.635 ms., avg: 17.705 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 20.366 ms., avg: 20.500 ms.
Timing FFTs using 4 threads.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 1.193 ms., avg: 1.244 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 1.561 ms., avg: 1.622 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 1.776 ms., avg: 1.836 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 2.395 ms., avg: 2.490 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 2.954 ms., avg: 3.011 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 3.537 ms., avg: 3.613 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 4.070 ms., avg: 4.109 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 5.326 ms., avg: 5.429 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 6.354 ms., avg: 6.426 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 7.712 ms., avg: 7.782 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 8.748 ms., avg: 8.834 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 11.151 ms., avg: 11.333 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 13.555 ms., avg: 13.604 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 15.920 ms., avg: 15.983 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 18.074 ms., avg: 18.141 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 2.017 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 2.085 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 2.294 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 2.199 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 2.696 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 3.139 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 3.100 ms.
Best time for 75 bit trial factors: 3.022 ms.
Best time for 76 bit trial factors: 3.020 ms.
Best time for 77 bit trial factors: 3.022 ms.

More about : prime bench mark

Best solution

January 18, 2014 4:25:56 PM

Prime95 isn't really a benchmark

Use Cinibench. It's easier to understand.

For those times listed, shorter is better and it's measured in milliseconds.
Share
January 18, 2014 4:31:18 PM

Prime95 is more of a stress test for your cpu and its cooling.
m
0
l
January 18, 2014 4:38:26 PM

oczdude8 said:
Prime95 is more of a stress test for your cpu and its cooling.


Prime 95 calculates Mersenne prime numbers using formulas dictated by a server.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime

We just use it for CPU testing, but that's not really it's purpose. Its for cloud computing.
m
0
l
!