Why are old GPU's so expensive?!?

AnotherDumbNoob

Honorable
Jan 17, 2014
17
0
10,510
I was thinking about building my own gaming PC once i get my tax check.... Well now i'm having second thoughts.

I've read countless forums from not even a year ago trying to decide what GPU to buy, and people are talking about how cheap this and that is.. Such as AMD 7950 for $200!?!?!??! Using the link provided, it took me to Newegg damn thing is $429 right now!!!! What the hell happened?

To a total noob like myself, i am quickly starting to think building a gaming PC isnt as cheap as people say. A CPU and GPU good enough to handle games at MAX settings and a few mods already put you at $500-600.... No thanks.
 
Solution


This is wrong. The price of new cards are lower than old cards. The reason you'll see old cards still being expensive is because they never sold for that price, and never will sell for that price.



None of this is right.

R9 280x = 7970GE
GTX 770 = GTX 680
A Titan and 780 aren't even different architectures. They are not the same card by any stretch of the imagination. This was the stupidest of them all.

GTX 780 Review
-------------- GTX Titan | GTX 780
Shaders-------2688---------2304
Texture Units-224-----------192...
Its not OLD cards specifically, just very powerful ones.
The 7950 became very popular with coin mining which shot prices through the roof, and once discontinued became even more expensive due to rarity.
I have an old (old) 7750, and its worth about 30 bucks now.
 

chrisso

Honorable
Nov 17, 2013
1,333
0
11,660
Building a pc to play games at max settings hasnt been cheap since 1080p became affordale.
To keep it cheap, use a card that will play well at 1600x.. and that wont bitmine. You can upgrade later when the mines are empty. ;#}
 
older cards like that are more expensive because if people want to sli, they are still cheaper than buying a new high end card but you can't really say no to the price since they don't make the card anymore. So there is 0 supply but still demand.
 

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


I have a 660ti and run BF4 maxed, 45 FPS.
30 min, and 70 max. (25fps is Blu-ray movie refresh rate)
And for me this is perfect.
 

AnotherDumbNoob

Honorable
Jan 17, 2014
17
0
10,510


How much did your setup cost you?
 

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160
The 760 is slightly better, it is just a rebranded 600 series GPU.
http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Battlefield_4-test-1920.jpg
 

chrisso

Honorable
Nov 17, 2013
1,333
0
11,660
Allright, objective look. Graphics cards like the rest of computing have never been cheaper.
They were just amazingly expensive to start with. Do you know how many transistors there are on a
7750? Did you know for 3 years graphics cards just changed name? Did you realise that some older varients break the bang per buck ratio but most people wouldnt look twice? When the GTX460 came out, in the U.K. a PNY 768 meg vs was available at yoyotech in london for £123.50. Nothing came close to the bangs per £ or the 60 odd degrees =5 yr life cycle. Now you kids moan a 7770 is expensive. Its faster, much cheaper, but
;'its a wimp' pack in the complaints, Man up with the wallet.
Gotta take a break, me cocoa is here. .
 

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


This is not what he asked, and insulting isagainst the code of conduct. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting-thank you.



My build had a nice penny, but I made it more for Video editing and some other things. Gaming is a plus :) (Going to go SLI 780 ti or something else in the next year and a 9590.) Or I may just wait for DDR4 and new nVidia GPUs with lessened wattage to performance. But back to your question, with peripherals and cooling and OS...etc, I think I paid ~1400. And retail without coupons and what not it would of cost 2500. But somethings are cheaper now.
 
Before this goes any further it would be in the best interest of all involved if you both dropped it.
Neither of you are trying to answer the OPs question, this is going nowhere, and there is no moral high ground here.

Argue over PM if you must, not all of us remembered our popcorn.
 

AnotherDumbNoob

Honorable
Jan 17, 2014
17
0
10,510
Hey how about both of you calm it down. I know the prices of GPU's is getting everybody fired up, but i don't want to start any wars here.

On a serious note, it's hard to "be a man" with my wallet when i am currently going to school. Here in 'Merica college costs about 10,000 GPU's... but like anything else, you get what you pay for. I just didn't understand why prices were down, then skyrocketed when they are *outdated* nonetheless performance wise, but you know what i mean. I'm new to PC stuff, as my name implies.

So basically they make new ones but the old ones are still very nice, causing an increase in demand. And anyone wanting to SLI gets a sweet deal, and greater performance. ... Got it. Thanks guys.
 

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160
Not really, the prices of old ones will be of similar price of the new ones because new cards are rebranded. The same exact GPU in a new card. 280x=7950, 770=670. 780 is the Titan.
Prices change due to bitcoin and litecoin miners messing up the market-which is why AMD prices are now over $100 more than a few months ago.
The Hynix fire caused GPU and RAM prices to go up as well.
When new GPU's, (NOT Cards) come out, prices on the market change. Which is why the 6 series went down when the 780 came out. (They didn't change for the Titan as the Titan is not really a gamers card as it has double precision and features meant for more professional use)
 

MasterMace

Distinguished
Oct 12, 2010
1,151
0
19,460


You have 3 parts that I'm going to address.

First - your tax check is a good start. if you're going to use that as your budget, you should put in a post on the Systems section making sure to Read the Thread telling you how to ask

Second, building a gaming PC can be cheap, and depending on what people you're listening to, can be as cheap as they say.

Third, to play a game at Max Settings on the PC is no simple task. There's a difference between being able to load a game and having it run at 60 frames per second. "Max Settings" to people refers to both the settings, and the resolution. You're going to find that at higher resolutions, it becomes dramatically more difficult to run at the same settings. 1280x720 to 1920x1080 increases the amount of space to render by 2.25 times. I could go on and on, talking about 1920x1200, 2560x1400, 2560x1600, 3820x2160, but you get the idea.

This is a lot of processing power just for increasing your resolution. To put it into perspective, when Crysis came out in 2007, the best graphics card money could buy could not run it at max over 60 frames per second.. Multiple graphics cards could not run it at max a year later over 60 frames per second.

At release, a GTX 280 cost $650. The next year it dropped down to $500. At release, a GTX 295 cost $500. The i7 965 Extreme still costs over $1000. The SLI-GTX 295 benchmark's CPU and Graphics alone costs $3000 in this picture.

gtx-295_chart-03.png


Is this to say that PC gaming isn't cheap? No. You can play games for much cheaper than that. You just need to realize there is a vast difference between your perception of "max settings" from the console and actual max settings.
 

MasterMace

Distinguished
Oct 12, 2010
1,151
0
19,460


This is wrong. The price of new cards are lower than old cards. The reason you'll see old cards still being expensive is because they never sold for that price, and never will sell for that price.



None of this is right.

R9 280x = 7970GE
GTX 770 = GTX 680
A Titan and 780 aren't even different architectures. They are not the same card by any stretch of the imagination. This was the stupidest of them all.

GTX 780 Review
-------------- GTX Titan | GTX 780
Shaders-------2688---------2304
Texture Units-224-----------192
ROPs-----------48------------48
Clock Rate --836mhz----863mhz
RAM-----------6GB---------3GB


As for the GTX 770
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-770-gk104-review,3519.html
And the R9 280x
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-280x-r9-270x-r7-260x,3635-2.html
 
Solution

Jake Wenta

Honorable
Mar 13, 2013
696
1
11,160


Sorry I got the rebrands wrong, but regardless-the titan and 780 use the same GPU. Didn't say they have the same architecture. Titan has double precision and other features, yes. But the Die is the same. GK110 -Which is why the 780 is nick-named the TitanJr.
And older how? Older like no longer being manufactured like 200 series, or older like previous generations? Or rebranded with GPUs?
Because the no longer manufactured are not sold in resellers-but on Ebay and other places. But not distributors/companies like newegg. And Last time I checked the 770 was more expensive than the 680 because on entry the prices of the 770 were higher. But the 780 and 780ti along with competition from AMD 290 which was 400 at the time, made nvidia reduce their prices. Didn't know the 6 series remained the same. But 290 is now >400.
 

Kesef

Reputable
May 28, 2014
10
0
4,510


You really don't need that powerful of a machine to run on max settings. I put roughly $600 into building my gaming rig, and any game I have played has run smoothly and on max settings [Including but not limited to; Skyrim, Starcraft II, WoW, SWTOR, Elder Scrolls Online, Thief (2014), and more].

Graphics Card: $154 Radeon HD 7850 (1GB 256-bit GDDR5) , which has been awesome. Everything is smooth in any game. I honestly think you can go even a little cheaper ($130-ish) and still have decent performance on max settings. I decided to go bigger and spend 190 on a 2Gb 256-bit GDDR5 Radeon something, to see if there is a difference. I notice a little better FPS, but overall it runs close to what I could before. My wife runs games on max with a $99 Radeon HD 7750 (128-bit GDDR5 1GB) on max settings by her preference, but you DO notice the performance difference. It does not meet expectations for me, but for her, it is good enough. It definitely has to be turned down for online gaming. I would not suggest that cheap of a card.

Motherboard: $45 A micro-ATX, instead of a normal ATX size. This can be considerably cheaper and still provide great performance.

Memory: $42 2x4GB DDR3 RAM running @ 1600. You might not even need more than 4GB, unless you do a lot of multitasking. Going up with speeds, though, can certainly help. Do not go more than 8GB, though. That is just overkill for games and very unnecessary.

CPU: $290 Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.1 GHz. the price difference might be $30 or more from 3.1-3.4 GHz (or higher), and you probably won't even notice the difference. I always go with Intel, because my experience has always been good. I also do a LOT of multitasking, so I went for the i7, instead of the i5. I do not have an i5 machine, so I cannot compare performance, but it is much cheaper, and you might have all that you need, depending on your uses beyond gaming. I would make sure you get the quad-core, instead of the dual core, i5 if you chose to go that route. I have not had as good of experiences with AMD systems, so I put the money into this by personal preference. You might be able to get good max-performance settings with an AMD CPU for $100 bucks less, I just won't guarantee it from my own experience.

Power Supply: $37 Kingwin 650W. This is a lower-end PSU in comparing to brand-names like Corsair or Thermaltake, but I have been using it for over a year now with no hiccups whatsoever. I feel I have gotten my money's worth, even if it died out today. Most cheap to mid-grade graphics cards don't even require higher than 500W-550W.

Storage: $23 Refurbished 250GB Western Digital 7200 RPM 8MB cache SATA 6 GB/s (I already had a 1TB 5400 drive, so I got a smaller cheaper one for a little faster speeds). You can get 1TB with the 7200 RPM and 6 GB/s for around $60 on a good deal.

CD/DVD-Rom: $15 24x DVD-R 48x CD-R. Anything better is honestly pure convenience if you watch DVD's on your machine, as most games nowadays do not even require a disk to read as you play. It might just take 10 minutes to install a large game, instead of 7 minutes lol.

Case: I just used my old mid-tower case that was running a really old rig. I have, however, put between $40-$50 into my wife's machines and it has been running just fine for 3 years without falling apart. They do are not quite as sturdy, though, so just be gentle with the cheaper cases. I would suggest looking for steel over aluminum cases.

Cooling: The case already had sufficient air cooling, and I already had a liquid cooling system, so this may be more cost to you. I would especially consider liquid cooling for your CPU. I have a cheaper one for about $50 that keeps my CPU around 45-50 degrees F that I have been using for over 3 years now. Air fans are not that expensive.

Keep note that this was not a machine that I just bought everything at once. I took my time and waited for good deals on almost every component (CPU for 289 instead of 309, and 154 instead of 179, RAM 42 instead of 65, Motherboard 45 instead of 69, for examples). These prices do also include any mail-in rebates that came besides the instant discounts. They take forever, but can make a difference in the overall price when it comes down to it. You may find only $10-$30 difference in each component, but it adds up. I also keep my eye out for refurbished parts.

When looking at graphics cards, the GB size is important, but not as important as other specs like whether it runs at 256-bit or 128-bit. The biggest thing I look for is the memory type. Get GDDR5 and NOT DDR3. No matter how big of DDR3 memory a graphics card has that I have seen, it is pale in comparison to GDDR5 with half the memory. Also compare core clock, streaming processors, effective memory clock, etc. Newegg keeps a good detail on such things.

If you have more and are willing to spend it (using my machine components about), I would put more into the motherboard and get some faster RAM. Also, that 7950 you mentioned is going for $220 with a $20 rebate from Sapphire on Newegg. It has 3GB of 384-bit GDDR5 memory. That sounds insane to me, but could be an epic choice. If you got something like that, you could most certainly go with a lesser CPU.

You really don't need a $1,000 machine to run games on max with smooth performance. If you are considered an "enthusiast," which it sounds like not, you might notice a difference. You might notice a difference in super competitive online gameplay. For those who are heavy and casual gamers, but not the elite enthusiasts, you will honestly not notice much difference between a $650 rig and a $1200 one.

As mentioned by other posts, "max settings" can be a difference in opinion. You can have everything to the max, and have lower FPS but still looks good and smooth, or have everything to the max and high FPS, looking good and smooth. I will update with the FPS that I get on different games.The link below is a good comparison of 30 FPS vs 60 FPS. You notice it with smaller quick motions, like when the Battlefield 4 example hits the ground after a jump. It is not AS noticeable otherwise.
http://gearnuke.com/30-vs-60-fps-can-eyes-tell-difference/

I am building an AMD-based system from scratch for a total of $500, including a case and a higher-end CPU fan. I will see how well it fairs.
 


well i hope your next build is a bit more balanced. not that the one you have now is bad, its just relatively speaking, the i7 paired with a 7850 is kinda weak. My FX 6300+ HD 7870 could do the same at considerably cheaper, and i have an FX 8320 now + HD 7870, all games still max and ultra. you should have a good time building that new rig!

also kingwin PSUs are amongst the worst available i think, tier 5 probably. Dont cheap out on the PSU, i would advise you buy a new one from Seasonic, XFX, Antec or a good Corsair
 

Kesef

Reputable
May 28, 2014
10
0
4,510


I love my i7. I have built three machines off of them for my wife and I (The first one I sold to a co-worker so I could upgrade to a newer i7 generation). I have been very impressed at how well they have run, especially with my intense multitasking. I used to run an HD 7750, and still ran ultra settings with an i7. Although there was certainly a performance loss in comparison, it was an acceptable quality-to-performance ratio at the time. I used to go as cheap as I could on graphics, since my computer is used more for other productivity than gaming, but never again. Well, I won't go SUPER cheap on them, as a more expensive card it a bit overboard for my tastes.

I actually built a machine with that FX 6300, which is one of my mentioned bad experienced with AMD systems. It was my second experiment to compare my Intel vs. AMD. When I still had that one (Everything was matched exact with other hardware (similar but not exact motherboard, and the 6300 was using liquid cooling while the i7 was using an average-but-not-expensive-priced air cooling fan), the i7 blew my FX 6300 away with performance in my daily use, including gaming, while keeping within 10 degree temps that of the 6300. Their base specs may be similar, but the performance is not (at least, not in my experience). That is why I have stuck with the i7. I don't know where you could come out with it being "weak." I have built lesser i7 machines (older Lynnfield 2.8GHz) for other family members, and their performance has still been top-notch.

Also, yes, the HD 7870 (2GB) is going to perform better overall than the 8750 (1GB) with faster speed and higher streaming processor count. However, my current performance is more than enough, and I saved $70 bucks at the time and got Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infinite to boot :).

As for the PSU, I only went with it because the reviews were still 4/5 on multiple sites with 25+ reviewers each. My older rigs that, I have since parted with, I had always gone with Corsair 750W or bigger. That large has really been unnecessary.This Kingwin is still performing well after over a year. I probably will not get it again though, in case I just happened to get one of those lucky good ones.

I keep hearing of other people having better experiences with AMD machines (such as users like you), which is why I am giving them another shot and going with the FX 8350 :). The 5MHz difference normally would not bother me, but I decided to go bigger just in case lol. I am also building a rig with the AMD A10-7850K Kaveri 3.7GHz Socket FM2+ for my cousin, who is on a very strict budget. The reviews for the processor and built-in graphics alone and paired with another HD R7 card has some really good reviews and I thought it an interesting build, so I am experimenting with that too lol. Either way, I love putting new machines together :).