2nd card needed to xfire existing 280x (advice please!)
Tags:
-
AMD
-
Gigabyte
- XFX
-
Graphics Cards
-
Sapphire
-
Graphics
- Performance
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 1:51:13 AM
i already own a sapphire toxic 280x and i understand i can xfire this with either another 280x or a 7970.
i have done my homework and i think i've narrowed it down to one of these cards from a price / performance POV.
280x - Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD £225 delivered 1.0Ghz STOC
280x - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Toxic £269 delivered 1.1Ghz STOC
7970 - XFX FX-797A-TDFC £205 delivered 925mhz STOC
Questions:
1) If i got the toxic would both cards run @ 1.1Ghz?
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
4) If i bought the 7970 would the would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 925mhz and if so could you justify the drop of 175mhz in the toxic? i.e. would the performance be noticeably different if i went xfired a toxic 280x / 7970 combo compared to a toxic 280x & gigabyte 280x?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
6) i have an XFX 850w bronze PSU - should be ok ?
7) i've o/c'd my toxic to 1.2ghz if i gota 2nd toxic and o/c'd that one to 1.2ghz would they both run at that speed?
8) can i overclock the gigabyte to 1.2ghz to xfire and run at 1.2ghz with the existing toxic?
sorry lots of questions, but any help appreciated.
i have done my homework and i think i've narrowed it down to one of these cards from a price / performance POV.
280x - Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD £225 delivered 1.0Ghz STOC
280x - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Toxic £269 delivered 1.1Ghz STOC
7970 - XFX FX-797A-TDFC £205 delivered 925mhz STOC
Questions:
1) If i got the toxic would both cards run @ 1.1Ghz?
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
4) If i bought the 7970 would the would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 925mhz and if so could you justify the drop of 175mhz in the toxic? i.e. would the performance be noticeably different if i went xfired a toxic 280x / 7970 combo compared to a toxic 280x & gigabyte 280x?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
6) i have an XFX 850w bronze PSU - should be ok ?
7) i've o/c'd my toxic to 1.2ghz if i gota 2nd toxic and o/c'd that one to 1.2ghz would they both run at that speed?
8) can i overclock the gigabyte to 1.2ghz to xfire and run at 1.2ghz with the existing toxic?
sorry lots of questions, but any help appreciated.
More about : 2nd card needed xfire existing 280x advice
Jonathan Cave said:
i already own a sapphire toxic 280x and i understand i can xfire this with either another 280x or a 7970.i have done my homework and i think i've narrowed it down to one of these cards from a price / performance POV.
280x - Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD £225 delivered 1.0Ghz STOC
280x - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Toxic £269 delivered 1.1Ghz STOC
7970 - XFX FX-797A-TDFC £205 delivered 925mhz STOC
Questions:
1) If i got the toxic would both cards run @ 1.1Ghz?
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
4) If i bought the 7970 would the would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 925mhz and if so oculd you justify the drop of 175mhz in the toxic? i.e. would the performance be noticeably different if i went xfired a toxic 280x / 7970 combo compared to a toxic 280x & gigabyte 280x?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
6) i have an XFX 850w bronze PSU - should be ok ?
Help please!
The best option is to xfire the same gpu, i had the same doubt earlier with my 270 but i got it clarified here.
The price differs according to each manufacturer because of their own GPU cooling tech and according to the material. I hope I have answered your concern ^_^
m
0
l
fruiten2
January 21, 2014 2:01:15 AM
Jonathan Cave said:
i already own a sapphire toxic 280x and i understand i can xfire this with either another 280x or a 7970.i have done my homework and i think i've narrowed it down to one of these cards from a price / performance POV.
280x - Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD £225 delivered 1.0Ghz STOC
280x - Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Toxic £269 delivered 1.1Ghz STOC
7970 - XFX FX-797A-TDFC £205 delivered 925mhz STOC
Questions:
1) If i got the toxic would both cards run @ 1.1Ghz?
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
4) If i bought the 7970 would the would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 925mhz and if so oculd you justify the drop of 175mhz in the toxic? i.e. would the performance be noticeably different if i went xfired a toxic 280x / 7970 combo compared to a toxic 280x & gigabyte 280x?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
6) i have an XFX 850w bronze PSU - should be ok ?
7) i've o/c'd my toxic to 1.2ghz if i got the toxic and o/c'd that one to 1.2ghz would they both run at that speed?
8) can i overclock the gigabyte to 1.2ghz to xfire and run at 1.2ghz with the existing toxic?
sorry lots of questions, but any help appreciated.
Easy 280x crossfire with 850W bronze psu should be good.
and you should get a second toxic 280x indeed.
It's Always better to get the same card again. Then you don't have to worry on different clock speeds and incompabilities.
You'll probably get both toxics at 1,2ghz, but not all gpu's are the same some overclock better some less
Good luck!
Don't forget to pick a solution
m
0
l
Related resources
- Advice Please:- looking for free/low cost software for stress testing a 2nd hand graphics card is working as it should. - Forum
- Need advice on new Graphic card on existing MoBo. - Forum
- Advice please:-Downgrading my Graphics card from 280x 3gb to a 5870 1gb but gaming at 1360 x 768. - Forum
- Need Some Advice: 5970 or 280x or Graphics Card in a range of £100 - £150 - Forum
- Advice on graphics card upgrade needed please! - Forum
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 2:06:48 AM
Thanks for the replies.
So forget it 7970.
it's a 280x race now then.
So still need some answers to these questions:
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
(performance wise is there a benchmark of this card vs the toxic???) tried google not sure if i have the right card. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_radeon_r9...
So forget it 7970.
it's a 280x race now then.
So still need some answers to these questions:
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
(performance wise is there a benchmark of this card vs the toxic???) tried google not sure if i have the right card. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_radeon_r9...
m
0
l
Jonathan Cave said:
Thanks for the replies.So forget it 7970.
it's a 280x race now then.
So still need some answers to these questions:
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
(performance wise is there a benchmark of this card vs the toxic???) tried google not sure if i have the right card. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_radeon_r9...
Hi,
You can get a gigabyte but the clockrate will be taken for the lowest, so for example both your GPUs will be performing at 1.1 even if 1 is at 1.2 and other is at 1.1
And regarding your price question I already answered, it purely depends on the manufacturer as each will have their own cooling tech, for eg Sapphire has dual line x and vapor x cooling msi has twin frozer, etc.. Sapphire has good quality board for GPUs. So its slightly higher then gigabyte.
m
0
l
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 2:13:39 AM
Rams Anirudh said:
Jonathan Cave said:
Thanks for the replies.So forget it 7970.
it's a 280x race now then.
So still need some answers to these questions:
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
(performance wise is there a benchmark of this card vs the toxic???) tried google not sure if i have the right card. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_radeon_r9...
Hi,
You can get a gigabyte but the clockrate will be taken for the lowest, so for example both your GPUs will be performing at 1.1 even if 1 is at 1.2 and other is at 1.1
And regarding your price question I already answered, it purely depends on the manufacturer as each will have their own cooling tech, for eg Sapphire has dual line x and vapor x cooling msi has twin frozer, etc.. Sapphire has good quality board for GPUs. So its slightly higher then gigabyte.
Thanks for the answer, are the memory speeds the same on the gigabyte vs toxic?
im leaning towards the gigabyte due to price point saving £45.
m
0
l
Jonathan Cave said:
Rams Anirudh said:
Jonathan Cave said:
Thanks for the replies.So forget it 7970.
it's a 280x race now then.
So still need some answers to these questions:
2) If i bought the gigabyte 280x @ 1.0Ghz would the existing toxic in my system under clock itself to 1.0ghz?
3) Is 100mhz worth £45?
5) Why is the gigabyte 280x so cheap when compared to other cards? am i missing something ? is the memory speed slower? confused.com!
(performance wise is there a benchmark of this card vs the toxic???) tried google not sure if i have the right card. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_radeon_r9...
Hi,
You can get a gigabyte but the clockrate will be taken for the lowest, so for example both your GPUs will be performing at 1.1 even if 1 is at 1.2 and other is at 1.1
And regarding your price question I already answered, it purely depends on the manufacturer as each will have their own cooling tech, for eg Sapphire has dual line x and vapor x cooling msi has twin frozer, etc.. Sapphire has good quality board for GPUs. So its slightly higher then gigabyte.
Thanks for the answer, are the memory speeds the same on the gigabyte vs toxic?
im leaning towards the gigabyte due to price point saving £45.
For Sapphire its 6400 MT/s and for Gigabyte its 6000 MT/s
If you have no more questions you can choose it as the best answer
m
0
l
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 2:22:36 AM
Toxic Core : 1100 Boost : 1150 Memory Width / Speed: 384 bit / 6400MHz
Gigabyte Core : 1050 Boost : 1100 Memory Width / Speed: 384 bit / 6000MHz
Does anyone know how the boosting will work if i would xfire these cards?
it's all getting a little confusing when it comes to core speed but it's worth while investing time investigating to save £45 if there's gong to be little performance difference.
so what speed would this combination run at at STOC XFire?
relax fella as soon as i've got the correct information to enable me to make my purchasing decision i'll choose a best answer
Gigabyte Core : 1050 Boost : 1100 Memory Width / Speed: 384 bit / 6000MHz
Does anyone know how the boosting will work if i would xfire these cards?
it's all getting a little confusing when it comes to core speed but it's worth while investing time investigating to save £45 if there's gong to be little performance difference.
so what speed would this combination run at at STOC XFire?
relax fella as soon as i've got the correct information to enable me to make my purchasing decision i'll choose a best answer
m
0
l
Jonathan Cave said:
Toxic Core : 1100 Boost : 1150 Memory Width / Speed: 384 bit / 6400MHzGigabyte Core : 1050 Boost : 1100 Memory Width / Speed: 384 bit / 6000MHz
Does anyone know how the boosting will work if i would xfire these cards?
it's all getting a little confusing when it comes to core speed but it's worth while investing time investigating to save £45 if there's gong to be little performance difference.
so what speed would this combination run at at STOC XFire?
relax fella as soon as i've got the correct information to enable me to make my purchasing decision i'll choose a best answer
It will always take the lesser one. The toxic would be performing according to the gigabyte one. Its not actually Mhz it should be MT/s. Few websites make this mistake often.
m
0
l
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 2:30:22 AM
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 3:57:48 AM
heero yuy
January 21, 2014 5:49:55 AM
Jonathan Cave
January 21, 2014 9:03:53 AM
Here's the specs for both cards:
![]()
![]()
The main differences i see are:
-50 Mhz Core
-100 Mhz Ram
-1.6 pixel fillrate
-7.6 texture fillrate
-19.2 bandwidth
Questions:
1. is it worth spending £45 more and buying a 2nd toxic or saving £45 and loose that performance above from the existing toxic card to match the gigabyte card.
2. How feasible is it to clock the gigabyte card an extra 50mhz and 100mhz?
i know some of you may be thinking it's only £45 but to me it's alot of money.


The main differences i see are:
-50 Mhz Core
-100 Mhz Ram
-1.6 pixel fillrate
-7.6 texture fillrate
-19.2 bandwidth
Questions:
1. is it worth spending £45 more and buying a 2nd toxic or saving £45 and loose that performance above from the existing toxic card to match the gigabyte card.
2. How feasible is it to clock the gigabyte card an extra 50mhz and 100mhz?
i know some of you may be thinking it's only £45 but to me it's alot of money.
m
0
l
heero yuy
January 21, 2014 11:40:08 AM
unfortunately it depends on the card you get
you might be able to get a card and put 200 Mhz on the core but sod all on the ram
if £45 is a lot of money then get the cheaper card - its still an upgrade and if it does overclock to the speeds of the faster card (or close to them) and stay stable then that is an added bonus and you saved yourself £45
you might be able to get a card and put 200 Mhz on the core but sod all on the ram
if £45 is a lot of money then get the cheaper card - its still an upgrade and if it does overclock to the speeds of the faster card (or close to them) and stay stable then that is an added bonus and you saved yourself £45
m
0
l
m
0
l
Best solution
You asked for me and here I am! ;-)
1) Yes, two exact same cards would run at their default clocks together with no changes.
2) Yes, but you could overclock the Gigabyte to 1.1GHz as well. The only thing is that you'd void your warranty. The exta 100MHz is probably not worth it anyway.
3) 100MHz isn't even worth $45 to me, let alone £45 considering that it's nothing more than a rather mild overclock.
4) The HD 7970 at 925MHz can still hit 1.1GHz easily. Hell, my twin Gigabyte Windforce HD 7970s are factory overclocked at 1050MHz right out of the box.
5) AMD/ATi has a history of being friendlier to the consumer than Intel and nVidia. They believe in open standards and not having their customers complaining about rectal agony from buying their products. The R280X is nothing more than a re-branded HD 7970, AMD doesn't deny this at all and perhaps doesn't believe in charging top dollar for two-year old technology, even if it is still the best that they have. So the situation is not "Why is AMD so cheap?" but "Why is nVidia so expensive?". I don't consider GeForce prices normal and Radeon prices low, I consider Radeon prices normal and GeForce prices generally in the butt-rape range.
6) The XFX 850W 80-plus Bronze-Certified PSU is more than enough for two HD 7970s/R9-280Xs.
7) Yes, but not because they're Toxics. ANY R9-280X clocked at 1.2GHz will run at that speed.
8) I don't know if the Gigabyte can overclock to 1.2GHz but honestly, who cares? I don't have my cards overclocked and wouldn't do so until their warranty is over. Until then, I won't need the overclock anyway. If you're running two of these cards in Crossfire, they will max out all games, regardless of whether they're 925MHz Powercolor Vanilla HD 7970s or Sapphire Toxic R9-280X's.
Hope this helps you out!
1) Yes, two exact same cards would run at their default clocks together with no changes.
2) Yes, but you could overclock the Gigabyte to 1.1GHz as well. The only thing is that you'd void your warranty. The exta 100MHz is probably not worth it anyway.
3) 100MHz isn't even worth $45 to me, let alone £45 considering that it's nothing more than a rather mild overclock.
4) The HD 7970 at 925MHz can still hit 1.1GHz easily. Hell, my twin Gigabyte Windforce HD 7970s are factory overclocked at 1050MHz right out of the box.
5) AMD/ATi has a history of being friendlier to the consumer than Intel and nVidia. They believe in open standards and not having their customers complaining about rectal agony from buying their products. The R280X is nothing more than a re-branded HD 7970, AMD doesn't deny this at all and perhaps doesn't believe in charging top dollar for two-year old technology, even if it is still the best that they have. So the situation is not "Why is AMD so cheap?" but "Why is nVidia so expensive?". I don't consider GeForce prices normal and Radeon prices low, I consider Radeon prices normal and GeForce prices generally in the butt-rape range.
6) The XFX 850W 80-plus Bronze-Certified PSU is more than enough for two HD 7970s/R9-280Xs.
7) Yes, but not because they're Toxics. ANY R9-280X clocked at 1.2GHz will run at that speed.
8) I don't know if the Gigabyte can overclock to 1.2GHz but honestly, who cares? I don't have my cards overclocked and wouldn't do so until their warranty is over. Until then, I won't need the overclock anyway. If you're running two of these cards in Crossfire, they will max out all games, regardless of whether they're 925MHz Powercolor Vanilla HD 7970s or Sapphire Toxic R9-280X's.
Hope this helps you out!
Share
Jonathan Cave
January 24, 2014 6:40:16 PM
Jonathan Cave
February 6, 2014 10:40:38 AM
Related resources
- Buying 2nd graphics card, need advice about SLI Forum
- SolvedI'm building a budget gaming PC, just need advice on the graphics card please! Forum
- SolvedPlease help, need advice on new graphics card Forum
- Graphics card upgrade advice needed please Forum
- Looking for better graphics card, need advice please Forum
- please i need advice, i am planning to upgrade my video card. Forum
- Which graphics card to purchase? need your advice. Please help! Forum
- In need of graphics card advice. Please help! Forum
- Xfx 8800 gts dying, need advice on a new card please.. Forum
- Need advice on video card and processor please Forum
- Upgrading video card, need advice please Forum
- Need some advice on choosing a Graphics card please11 Forum
- Need Some Advice on Card Choices, Please Forum
- Need Video Card Advice Please Forum
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!