amd a10-7850k vs fx 8350

Solution


in the interest of fairness... a 8350 is a 0 on the scale since it has no graphics at all. i agree with the rest and since he plans/has a r9 280x toxic the 8350 (or 8320) is clearly the better choice.


normally this is true, but you can never be sure that the 8320 will work properly at 8350 speeds. yes, it's the exact same architecture and there's no reason for it not to work, but you're at the mercy of the binning process at amd.

it's possible also that you get a 8320 that will not be stable at the 8350 speeds no matter what you do and that's why it didn't get binned as 8350.

the 8350 is the safe choice, since it passed factory testing at those speeds.
 


in the interest of fairness... a 8350 is a 0 on the scale since it has no graphics at all. i agree with the rest and since he plans/has a r9 280x toxic the 8350 (or 8320) is clearly the better choice.
 
Solution