DarkSable :
babernet_1, what exactly are you talking about when you mean the new features of Haswell? And it's not as though it's suddenly faster or more efficient.
Hardwaremaster, Haswell is only about 5% faster than Ivy Bridge, clock-for-clock. That means at the same clock speed, haswell is very very slightly faster. If you have Ivy Bridge running at 4.4GHz (easily doable) vs a Haswell chip at 3.4GHz?
Yeah, there's simply going to be no contest there. The chip that can overclock wins.
The Haswell has the following:
Wider core: fourth ALU, third AGU, second branch prediction unit, deeper buffers, higher cache bandwidth, improved front-end and memory controller
New instructions[22] (HNI, includes Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2), gather, BMI1, BMI2, LZCNT and FMA3 support)
The instruction decode queue, which holds instructions after they have been decoded, is no longer statically partitioned between the two threads that each core can service.[18]
Now when you looked at the initial reviews of the 4670K, the speed was around 5% or so faster, clock for clock, and almost insignificant amount. However, it does amount to about 200MHz more clock speed. However, I saw some recent comparisons of the 4670K vs 3570K and now the 4670K can be 10 to 20% faster, clock for clock, since drivers/software are now starting to use some of these new features.