Solved

AMD FX-8320 Vishera 3.5ghz vs AMD FX-8350 Vishera 4.0 ghz is extra $40 worth it?

3.5ghz vs 4.0ghz
8 answers Last reply Best Answer
More about amd 8320 vishera 5ghz amd 8350 vishera ghz extra worth
  1. Not worth it. FX-8320 can handle all games up-to-date and future upcoming games for the time being.
  2. Only a light overclock away from being identical.
  3. Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.
  4. spentshells said:
    Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.


    The average overclock for the two is less than 100mhz different. It is not worth getting the FX 8350.
  5. Best answer
    logainofhades said:
    spentshells said:
    Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.


    The average overclock for the two is less than 100mhz different. It is not worth getting the FX 8350.


    yeah thats what I said, "but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far."

    The only real difference will be the amount of voltage used to get there
  6. Yea, I was just adding to what you were saying to help the OP. :D
  7. logainofhades said:
    Yea, I was just adding to what you were saying to help the OP. :D


    oh sorry bud my bad, people have just been at my throat lately.
  8. No problem. :D
Ask a new question

Read More

AMD CPUs