Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.
The average overclock for the two is less than 100mhz different. It is not worth getting the FX 8350.
yeah thats what I said, "but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far."
The only real difference will be the amount of voltage used to get there
Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.
Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.
The average overclock for the two is less than 100mhz different. It is not worth getting the FX 8350.
Well are you planning on doing a heavy overclock? If so yes it will give you more headroom but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far.
The average overclock for the two is less than 100mhz different. It is not worth getting the FX 8350.
yeah thats what I said, "but if you have great cooling there is no reason the 8320 couldn't get almost as far."
The only real difference will be the amount of voltage used to get there