Preface with this: Cost is not my issue - I have permission from my lovely wife to spend what I like on my first custom gaming rig (praise be to the gods of love, she loves me). My question revolves around the overall (especially future) usefulness of AMD's 8-core processors and their link to future software.
I am considering a build of near identical parts with the exception of my indecision between the AMD FX 8350, and Intel's i5 4670k.
I have read a great deal and understand the Intel processors are the favorite. They are more powerful for everyday use and most gaming applications.
Question is: Do I consider more seriously the idea that more and more programmers are going to utilize more cores/threads simply because they are available to be utilized? And in that consideration, does that not mean that a processor with more cores will be more "future proof"?
Note that I am not a multitasker, nor a streamer or 'Youtuber' (why that ever became a thing is beyond me, bunch of lazy good for nothings, [middle of the question rant, apologies]). I couldn't give a spit about 3D rendering and whatever whatchamacallits. I am building the machine to play my favorite games (mind you that I don't care for old games, I carry no nostalgia in my man-purse, so they'll all be modern), and for word and what have you. Thank you all.
To update:
Anything wrong with this build? (Keep in mind that where I limit myself is because of my own frugality and all of the many (many, many) things I've read about price to performance ratio and whatnots.)
Intel® Core™ i7-4770K 3.50 GHz - on - GIGABYTE Z87X-HD3 ATX
8GB (4GBx2) DDR3/1600MHz Corsair Vengeance
AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB
120GB Samsung 840 EVO Series SATA-III 6.0Gb/s SSD
I will overpower the machine for future upgrades and such. The other details don't really matter.
I am considering a build of near identical parts with the exception of my indecision between the AMD FX 8350, and Intel's i5 4670k.
I have read a great deal and understand the Intel processors are the favorite. They are more powerful for everyday use and most gaming applications.
Question is: Do I consider more seriously the idea that more and more programmers are going to utilize more cores/threads simply because they are available to be utilized? And in that consideration, does that not mean that a processor with more cores will be more "future proof"?
Note that I am not a multitasker, nor a streamer or 'Youtuber' (why that ever became a thing is beyond me, bunch of lazy good for nothings, [middle of the question rant, apologies]). I couldn't give a spit about 3D rendering and whatever whatchamacallits. I am building the machine to play my favorite games (mind you that I don't care for old games, I carry no nostalgia in my man-purse, so they'll all be modern), and for word and what have you. Thank you all.
To update:
Anything wrong with this build? (Keep in mind that where I limit myself is because of my own frugality and all of the many (many, many) things I've read about price to performance ratio and whatnots.)
Intel® Core™ i7-4770K 3.50 GHz - on - GIGABYTE Z87X-HD3 ATX
8GB (4GBx2) DDR3/1600MHz Corsair Vengeance
AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB
120GB Samsung 840 EVO Series SATA-III 6.0Gb/s SSD
I will overpower the machine for future upgrades and such. The other details don't really matter.