Gam3r01 :
thebadkarma :
Agreed with feroo. I went from amd a8 to amd fx 6350 to finally intel it 4670. Intel by far gave me the best performance. When I had the fx 6350 my fps was 150 max. And 70 minimum. With the intel chip its 250 max. 150 minimum.
Judging performance on the processor alone is pointless. The 6350 is isnt even in the same price range as the i5, so its pointless to compare those two as well.
Upgrading a CPU wont increase FPS by itself. The graphics card is the major component in performance (in fps).
While there is no debate that Intel can bet AMD processors, you pay for that privilege, which you may never use.
yes that's why i already stated in my first post:
"if u were previously own a AMD cpu using the same socket as fx9370 then u are set with that. but if u are looking for a fresh new start, i suggest go for i5-4670K for pure gaming experience instead of AMD. it is better and priced decently. for ur reference, PS4 implement amd gpu on par to HD78xx series (probably 7850) and XB1 implement gpu on par with HD76xx series (prolly 7670) so if u want to beat it just enough then ur gpu should be r9-270X, or nvidia gtx 760, and up. spec wise u'll beat those consoles in any games u can find, but sometimes games are optimized differently and may look better on those consoles than PC just like the newly remade Tom Raider definitive edition. But overall, with those spec I mentioned u'll be dominating those consoles."
see that i recommend him better gpu compared to those consoles? and the choice of using both platform, intel and amd. he just need to use the reference on PS4 and XB1 that i mentioned then use it to build a decent rig that overpower them. i already give a solution to his needs.