and fx 9590 vs i7 4930k

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Sort by date Sort by votes
RobCrezz

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador
Mar 14, 2013
19,080
99
75,190


+1. The 4930k is a far superior CPU at stock speeds, overclocking will only increase that gap.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
rmpumper

rmpumper

Distinguished
Apr 17, 2009
459
0
18,810
4930K. No contest. 9590 is just overclocked 8350 so you won't be able to push it any further than it already is. And OC'ed 8350 can barely beat OC'ed 4670K in multitasking.

4930K at 5GHz would be ~40% faster than 9590 5GHz in multitasking software.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Rams Anirudh

Rams Anirudh

Honorable
Jan 18, 2014
692
0
11,360


May be I heard it wrong. Will handle that :) Anyways thanks for correction
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
N

navyboy887

Honorable
Oct 31, 2012
93
0
10,660
I'd go with the i7 because it has a lot more potential. The 9590 at 5GHz is about the same as a 3.4GHz 4930k. Imagine how much faster the 4930k @ 5GHz. It would destroy the 9590. I'm not trying to be a fanboy, I have an 8320 and it's a great CPU. But at the moment, Intel has got the lead.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
1depp1

1depp1

Honorable
Jul 12, 2012
310
0
10,810
The Intel Core i7 4930K although it is a 6 core CPU compared to the AMD FX 9590 which has 8 cores; will easily beat the AMD CPU because of Intel's superior x86 architecture.
Not being a fanboy, but I am just stating the truth.
If you are using a CPU for GAMING ONLY, then, the AMD FX 8350/9590 will be sufficient enough to be paired with a high end GPU to play modern games on 1080p or 4K resolution displays no problem.

But hands down on Intel in productivity and content creation.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom