Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Should I be expecting better performance in Dota 2? (i3 4000m, hd4600)

Last response: in Video Games
Share
February 6, 2014 2:04:43 PM

Hi all,

About a month ago I got a new laptop. The computer I bought is the Lenovo Thinkpad L440.
One of the reasons I bought it was that I was under the impression that the i3 4000M cpu with it's integrated HD4600 gpu was sufficient to play my favourite PC game, Dota 2 at a good framerate at low settings.

I have been rather disappointed with the performance I have been getting.
With the game running at 1600x900 with all settings to their lowest value except for render quality at 100%, I got an average FPS of 37. When I tested the game on highest settings with AA disabled, the average framerate was 27.

This is rather concerning because the Dota 2 benchmark on this site shows an intel HD4000 achieving higher framerates than what I am getting, even though I have a better integrated card and am running at lower resolution and settings than the benchmark.


When I was testing the game, I had the laptop plugged in, the power profile in windows was set to high performance (min cpu frequency at 100% and graphics set to max performance). I have the latest Intel graphics driver installed. Is there any other setting, perhaps in Windows or the BIOS that I may be missing that is hindering my performance?

Best solution

February 6, 2014 2:22:03 PM

Well the 4600 isn't better than the 4000. Just because numbers are bigger, not always better.

http://ark.intel.com/products/67355/intel-core-i5-3210m... The i5 used in the benchmark

http://ark.intel.com/products/75104/Intel-Core-i3-4000M... your cpu.

Scroll down and look at the GPU specs. yours is 250mhz or 38% slower.

Might have something to do with it.
Share
February 6, 2014 2:27:20 PM

The i5 in that review is 2.5GHz (turbo to 3.1GHz) - the i3-4000m tops out at 2.4GHz.

I'd wager a guess that the CPU is to blame as difference between lowest to highest detail settings only make a ~33% difference in framerates.
m
0
l
February 6, 2014 2:30:51 PM

getochkn said:
Well the 4600 isn't better than the 4000. Just because numbers are bigger, not always better.

http://ark.intel.com/products/67355/intel-core-i5-3210m... The i5 used in the benchmark

http://ark.intel.com/products/75104/Intel-Core-i3-4000M... your cpu.

Scroll down and look at the GPU specs. yours is 250mhz or 38% slower.

Might have something to do with it.


The base frequency of 400/650MHz doesn't matter as this is to achieve low power at idle/low load. The max frequency of 1100MHz for both puts them at even footing.
m
0
l
!