Upgrade: Intel VS AMD

apcs13

Honorable
Oct 2, 2013
960
0
11,360
First thing's first, please try to discard any non-factual (outside of your opinion on which is the better option) or "fanboy-ish" statements before posting an answer here, thanks!

Hello everyone, I just built myself a PC this past December, and so far it's been pretty great. However, in order to get the GPU that I wanted, I had to downgrade my CPU to an FX-6350. However, I notice that in some key CPU dependent games (Battlefield 3/4, Assassin's Creed IV, certain areas of Metro Last Light, Saint's Row IV are the ones so far) my FPS is generally a little lower than other people with GTX 770's. Some people say that SR:IV is unoptimized for PC, which it isn't, but sometimes when looking down while flying I drop to around 35-40 FPS, which is really laggy for me personally. Also, BF3 doesn't always work as well as other people with the same GPU, for example, someone with a GTX 770 and an i7 3770K never dropped below 60 in a BF3 benchmark and averaged around the mid 70's, while on maps like Noshahr Canals 64 player TDM (same test scenario) I dip to the high 40's in the spawn menu (doesn't matter but just putting it in there) and sometimes find myself in the mid 50's, which doesn't really bother me, but I can tell I am getting less performance in CPU-bound games by a fair bit. Also, in certain areas of Metro Last Light with a lot of enemies shooting and me firing back, my FPS often drops into the mid-forties, and I was guessing it was a CPU problem, but I don't know about that. Anyways, here is what I was thinking:

Since I just got the PC this past December, I don't want to already spend more money on it, especially since it works fine for the most part. However, I already know the CPU is holding my GPU back and will cause issue in demanding modern games in not too long. So, I have two options in my mind that I wanted to ask you about now so I could start saving money appropriately:
1. In about a year or so, upgrade to an FX-8320/8350, or another better AM3+ socket CPU
OR
2. In about 2-4 years, get a new motherboard, a copy of Windows 8(.1)/9(if its out), an SSD to install it on (don't have one now), and an i7 3770K or 4770K or something like that, or a new one if Intel releases a good new version.

The reason I ask this now is because I need to know how long I will have to save up, because I am guessing for a good motherboard, good SSD, new OS, and powerful Intel CPU, it could cost almost $600, while the AMD route could only cost me $150-200, depending on pricing for the 8320 in the next few years. I could also just stick with Windows 7 and forget the SSD, but I figured I might as well just pick one up.

So what do you guys think? Should I stick with my mobo, which works fine, and go with the inexpensive 8320 in around a year or so? Or, should I hold off longer, and do a kind of system overhaul? Thanks for chiming in!

Also, don't forget, the earliest this is probably going to happen is in a year or more, I'm quite happy with my system right now, I just need a guideline on how to budget my money in the future!

EDIT: Extra information if you need to know it: My top priority is gaming on this PC, followed by video editing and then personal work. I have a laptop that I usually do my work on and write code, but sometimes the extra horsepower of my desktop helps speed up the process, so I will use that. The video editing isn't really important when it comes to speed, I am perfectly fine how long it takes to render videos now on my 8GB RAM and 6350, so I guess the main factor is gaming performance.

Also, my specs are in my signature!
 
Solution
1 It will be correct to answer this in a year but the FX83xx series in general gets a few more FPS than the FX63xx.
2 If you want to stay on top of the gaming world then every 3-5years there is a platform upgrade needed to keep up with progress. That is what I do and in between at least 1 GPU upgrade while still on the same platform.
The 8320 should meet all your needs and runs a little under the 4670, so it is very capable. My recommendation is to get a cpu cooler and OC the hell out of your current CPU. the FX series are unlocked and fully overclockable so take advantage of that.
 
1 It will be correct to answer this in a year but the FX83xx series in general gets a few more FPS than the FX63xx.
2 If you want to stay on top of the gaming world then every 3-5years there is a platform upgrade needed to keep up with progress. That is what I do and in between at least 1 GPU upgrade while still on the same platform.
 
Solution

apcs13

Honorable
Oct 2, 2013
960
0
11,360


Thank you for your very fast and helpful reply! I already do have a CPU cooler for my 6350 and have a mild OC of 4.4 GHz, but I was unsure of upping the clock speed more due to my inexperience with overclocking, fear of changing voltages, and also due to my motherboard being a 970 chipset. All of my specs are in the signature, but I forgot to point out that I have an Asus M5A97 R2.0 motherboard, which does have VRM heatsinks unlike the original, but I was still worried about OCing above 4.5 GHz. Do you think with my motherboard that I would be okay to raise the speed even higher? Thank you!
 

apcs13

Honorable
Oct 2, 2013
960
0
11,360


Thank you for your fast reply! I forgot to mention, but my specs are in my signature, where I do have listed my motherboard and CPU cooler. I do have a mild OC to 4.4 GHz with cool temps at full load, but I was nervous about pushing too hard with my motherboard. It is a solid board, but runs on a 970 chipset, and even though the Asus M5A97 R2.0 does have VRM heatsinks, I don't know about pushing too much on a 970 board. Is it okay to raise the clock even higher on my current motherboard? Thanks!
 

apcs13

Honorable
Oct 2, 2013
960
0
11,360


Thanks for the fast reply! Are you saying that an upgrade to an FX 8320 would not provide a sufficient performance increase to my PC in gaming scenarios? I do realize that every so often I will have to do an almost full upgrade, I Was just wondering if it was worth spending extra on an Intel configuration, which is why I asked here!
 

Currently I do not think upgrading to FX8320 would be worth it for just few fps in certain games at the same settings.
I would leave the upgrade option open down the line who knows what those CPU's will sell for used in a year or two when people like me upgrade, and maybe they can be grabbed for less than $100 on ebay or other auction sites.
 

apcs13

Honorable
Oct 2, 2013
960
0
11,360


That link was pretty helpful, thanks! I might try later today to up it to 4.6 or 4.7 GHz, hopefully the auto voltage setting will make it easier for me to do it without ruining my PC! If I do decide to try it, I will run Prime95 overnight and get back to you guys here to see if it helps keep my FPS higher. If I don't manage to get the time, I will try to do it as soon as I am able.
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator
If you happen to live near a Microcenter, you can get an FX 8320 for $100. Otherwise, keep what you have and turn a few settings down. Shadows and special lighting tend to be framerate killers. I would lower those for sure, maybe bit less environment detail. Do you really need every possible blade of grass on the screen to enjoy it? You can turn down visually insignificant settings and gain some FPS quite easily, while still having a game that looks great.
 

apcs13

Honorable
Oct 2, 2013
960
0
11,360




True, high graphics settings enhance the game but aren't close to my #1 priority. What does cause an issue with me is that people with worse or equivalent hardware are getting better performance than me sometimes. For example, on Paracel Storm in BF4, on low settings at 1080P I was getting framerates in the 50's on my CPU and GTX 770, which is absurd. Yet, on Rogue Transmission, I manage to stay above 60 FPS at all times on ultra settings.

Also I don't live near any computer hardware shops :/