FX 6350 vs i5 3350P
- Thread starter And7rey
- Start date
VincezioVonHook
Honorable
- Sep 24, 2013
- 89
- 0
- 10,660
No they are not bad for gaming. i have an fx-6300 with a radeon 7850 2gb and i get 60fps BF4 ultra, 60fps skyrim ultra with 2k/4k textures, 40-50fps in crysis 3, 60fps tomb raider ultra and so on. They are nice and cheap too!. Th give you an idea on cpu performance: games become more cpu bound when you lower the graphical settings down to minimum, and i can get 160-180fps in bf4 on low.....so the fx is very capable for a budget cpu.
The i5 will be better at single or dual threaded games as it has higher single core performance, but most games these days are optimized for multi-core. Put it this way running bf4 on ultra (minus AA) pop a clean 60fps with 35-45% CPU usage. They are more than capable of gaming very well. For example on the intel side, skyrim runs a little better on my i5 (i5 2500 thogh) than the fx,but in all respects both are capable of all games on the market today.
The i5 will be better at single or dual threaded games as it has higher single core performance, but most games these days are optimized for multi-core. Put it this way running bf4 on ultra (minus AA) pop a clean 60fps with 35-45% CPU usage. They are more than capable of gaming very well. For example on the intel side, skyrim runs a little better on my i5 (i5 2500 thogh) than the fx,but in all respects both are capable of all games on the market today.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
News Windows 11 will reportedly display a watermark if your PC does not support AI requirements- Started by Admin
- Replies: 18
-
Question Can I plug a docking station to a USB-C 2.0 port to have video output?- Started by jameli
- Replies: 2
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram