I've been reading and researching quite a bit lately before deciding which way to go with an upgrade. At 42 I've had plenty of PCs/ laptops and experience dating back to Windows 3.1, but
I've not built or upgraded a system since the early Win XP days. Migrating back from gaming on Xbox for mostly those 10 years. Obviously, things have changed.
Let me lay out a couple of things to give as much info as possible:
1) In those 20 some years of computing and as a building automation specialist, I've had at least 4 or 5 Nvidia or Gforce cards stop working or fail in different machines, without overclocking any of them. So NVidia is NOT an option for me. Fan boys need not reply, you will be ignored. I don't care about increased performance or 10% more FPS, I want something that will last.
2) My current machine is an ASUS CM1630. Specs are Athlon X2 270 @ 3.4 GHZ. 12 GB 1333 PC-10666 Ram (4 channels w/ 8gb on 1 and 4gb that came stock on the other), XFX 2GB DDR3 6670 discrete card, ASUS M4A78LT-M mobo (8.1 Bios), 500 Watt Power Center. It has the 760G chipset and obviously I am not using the integrated graphics as I added the 6670 last year.
So basically for now, I'm looking at a new Mobo and CPU, because most everything else I have will work. I also want the ability to add on later. I want a future upgrade path. That's the key.
3) My priorities are based on steady gaming for Skyrim and BF4 @ 1960x1080 or lower with medium to high settings, but mostly for longevity. I usually run 1600x900, so a second monitor or Hydravision isn't really a concern except for maybe the Battlescreen on a 2nd monitor. I am able to play both titles currently, but experience stuttering and sub-30 FPS here and there. My Skyrim is heavily modded, but playable.
BF4 is basically unplayable for multiplayer, even with low and tweaks settings..
4) I've looked at the i5-4670k with the Z87-1150, but I'm not willing to spend an extra $80-100 on a CPU/mobo combination for a name. Yes Intel is better, but for my purposes that's $100 that could be spent on a SSD or new tower with a cooling solution. Intel also likes to change their sockets, so it limits my upgrade path down the road so I ruled that out as well.
I have been debating between the new A10-7850 and upgrading the discrete card down the road to pair with Dual Graphics, or throwing in an FX-8350 or 6300 to mate with the 6670 and upgrading the card down the road.
If I go the 7850 route, it would be with the 88X chipset mobo. If I go the FX route, I want to get the 990FX or X chipset mobo. I read this revue below and was wondering what the difference is between the ASrock extreme 3 and extreme 9, or the UD3 vs. 4 or other on the Giga are considering the price difference. Do I need the higher board ? I usually don't overclock, but I would like the ability to do minor OCing if I choose. If I get the ASUS, I'd likely go with the Pro R2.0.
Either way, the cost is about the same. I'm thinking either solution (7850 or FX) with the 6670 will get me to at least a playable game on lower resolutions
If I go the FM2+ mobo route, any recommends for the Mobo ? The onboard LAN and Sound will be important short term. Long term the SC will be upgraded.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/990fx-motherboard-review-amd-fx,3464-2.html
I was leaning towards the 7850 considering dual graphics and the benefits of Mantle and integration. I like the direction that is going and it appears the FX line isn't going to see much change in the near future but the A10 is (according to published AMD flow chart).I also like the PCIe3.0 support the FM2+ boards have that the AM3+ boards don't.
Problem is that I keep reading only the R7 240s and R7 250s will Dual Graphics with the A10 series cards. Is that going to change in future driver releases ? I was hoping to eventually pair it with a R7 260x or R9, but if the A10 will only ever pair with the 240 or 250 then the decision is obvious.
I don't have or run many applications where multiple cores are a concern. My current rig is plenty for basically everything but BF4.
At any rate, obviously I have a fork in the road here in terms of which way to go. Open to suggestions for CPU and Mobo pairings. Also looking at a new case with cooling and Power. Calculator says I'm good to go with my current 500W, but if I add a sound card and better GPU down the road I may need 600 or so.
As stated before, I want to upgrade the Mobo and CPU now while giving myself a lot of room for an upgrade path. Thanks in advance.
I've not built or upgraded a system since the early Win XP days. Migrating back from gaming on Xbox for mostly those 10 years. Obviously, things have changed.
Let me lay out a couple of things to give as much info as possible:
1) In those 20 some years of computing and as a building automation specialist, I've had at least 4 or 5 Nvidia or Gforce cards stop working or fail in different machines, without overclocking any of them. So NVidia is NOT an option for me. Fan boys need not reply, you will be ignored. I don't care about increased performance or 10% more FPS, I want something that will last.
2) My current machine is an ASUS CM1630. Specs are Athlon X2 270 @ 3.4 GHZ. 12 GB 1333 PC-10666 Ram (4 channels w/ 8gb on 1 and 4gb that came stock on the other), XFX 2GB DDR3 6670 discrete card, ASUS M4A78LT-M mobo (8.1 Bios), 500 Watt Power Center. It has the 760G chipset and obviously I am not using the integrated graphics as I added the 6670 last year.
So basically for now, I'm looking at a new Mobo and CPU, because most everything else I have will work. I also want the ability to add on later. I want a future upgrade path. That's the key.
3) My priorities are based on steady gaming for Skyrim and BF4 @ 1960x1080 or lower with medium to high settings, but mostly for longevity. I usually run 1600x900, so a second monitor or Hydravision isn't really a concern except for maybe the Battlescreen on a 2nd monitor. I am able to play both titles currently, but experience stuttering and sub-30 FPS here and there. My Skyrim is heavily modded, but playable.
BF4 is basically unplayable for multiplayer, even with low and tweaks settings..
4) I've looked at the i5-4670k with the Z87-1150, but I'm not willing to spend an extra $80-100 on a CPU/mobo combination for a name. Yes Intel is better, but for my purposes that's $100 that could be spent on a SSD or new tower with a cooling solution. Intel also likes to change their sockets, so it limits my upgrade path down the road so I ruled that out as well.
I have been debating between the new A10-7850 and upgrading the discrete card down the road to pair with Dual Graphics, or throwing in an FX-8350 or 6300 to mate with the 6670 and upgrading the card down the road.
If I go the 7850 route, it would be with the 88X chipset mobo. If I go the FX route, I want to get the 990FX or X chipset mobo. I read this revue below and was wondering what the difference is between the ASrock extreme 3 and extreme 9, or the UD3 vs. 4 or other on the Giga are considering the price difference. Do I need the higher board ? I usually don't overclock, but I would like the ability to do minor OCing if I choose. If I get the ASUS, I'd likely go with the Pro R2.0.
Either way, the cost is about the same. I'm thinking either solution (7850 or FX) with the 6670 will get me to at least a playable game on lower resolutions
If I go the FM2+ mobo route, any recommends for the Mobo ? The onboard LAN and Sound will be important short term. Long term the SC will be upgraded.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/990fx-motherboard-review-amd-fx,3464-2.html
I was leaning towards the 7850 considering dual graphics and the benefits of Mantle and integration. I like the direction that is going and it appears the FX line isn't going to see much change in the near future but the A10 is (according to published AMD flow chart).I also like the PCIe3.0 support the FM2+ boards have that the AM3+ boards don't.
Problem is that I keep reading only the R7 240s and R7 250s will Dual Graphics with the A10 series cards. Is that going to change in future driver releases ? I was hoping to eventually pair it with a R7 260x or R9, but if the A10 will only ever pair with the 240 or 250 then the decision is obvious.
I don't have or run many applications where multiple cores are a concern. My current rig is plenty for basically everything but BF4.
At any rate, obviously I have a fork in the road here in terms of which way to go. Open to suggestions for CPU and Mobo pairings. Also looking at a new case with cooling and Power. Calculator says I'm good to go with my current 500W, but if I add a sound card and better GPU down the road I may need 600 or so.
As stated before, I want to upgrade the Mobo and CPU now while giving myself a lot of room for an upgrade path. Thanks in advance.