Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

CryEngine vs FrostBite vs Unreal Engine

Tags:
  • Engine
  • Video Games
Last response: in Video Games
Share
March 11, 2014 9:26:59 AM

Which is better in every aspect ?

More about : cryengine frostbite unreal engine

March 11, 2014 11:53:30 PM

kind of a stupid question but ok
cryengine used by cryteck in production of farcry series.
frostbite used by EA for battlefield series
and unreal used for various games.
now the question is what do u like to play
online or campaign.?
m
0
l

Best solution

March 11, 2014 11:58:12 PM

CRYENGINE... cryengine has pushed games to the next level.
Share
Related resources
March 12, 2014 12:27:30 AM

i believe forstbite did
yes far cry 4 is in the making but look at the graphics of bf4
so life like
still cryteck has not releases such a superior version than bf series
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 12:54:35 AM

Diffentence:
Cryteck- Have good graphics but no multiplayer support
FrostBite - Have a Great Graphics but not so good MP support (Bf4 has many Netcode issues)
Unreal - Have a both fair graphics and MP support
Source 2.0- Have fine graphics but a great MP support

If you trying to buy a game of your choice please take note whether there is MP or not.
I hope I helped!
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 1:26:19 AM

Your kidin right? Frosbite is nothing in front of cryengine. Cryengine make pc go on their knees with still crysis 1 unplayable on ultra. That is bf4 already achievable with high or ultra. Try doing that with crysis 3? Ut going to need a 2 or 3 way sli just to achieve that on 1440p +. And far cry uses a diff engine known as modified dunia 2.5 engine.
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 1:36:01 AM

caj said:
Your kidin right? Frosbite is nothing in front of cryengine. Cryengine make pc go on their knees with still crysis 1 unplayable on ultra. That is bf4 already achievable with high or ultra. Try doing that with crysis 3? Ut going to need a 2 or 3 way sli just to achieve that on 1440p +. And far cry uses a diff engine known as modified dunia 2.5 engine.


Caj, we arent here to debate which is the best. We are here to just help op with his question. Cryengine was the best but not now. Making your PC down on it knees is not good for PC, its gonna cry. As for BF4, DICE wants everyone to enjoy the game not just High users, this is marketing skills. Thats why crysis 3 was not that profitable.
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 1:43:28 AM

Contraty to what you think the question asked was
Which is better in all aspects.what did you expect?Crytek has a reputation to maintain? They made only 4 games but those game where the most epicgames which gained their repuattion and respect. EA dice had just their main focus on multiplayer else their singleplayer caimpaign royally sucks. Crytek redefined open world environment and pushed the next gen grpahics. It not any1 fault if the consoles failed to render a game properly just coz the coporation such as sony or ms choose to cut on cost. If bf4 was so great why are the stockholders still suing EA & stillthe game ridden with bugs? Oh for the record as in regard to pc on your knees...much games use cryengine as compared to frosbite.
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 2:09:19 AM

You sound Like a Crysis FanBoy.
Anyway I purpose was done, Op can choose whatever he or she likes. I gave a reasonable answer.
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 2:17:01 AM

Contrary to what you think I base an engine on what I have seen it do in terms of effects, graphics and performance, not on fanboyism. You probably never head of the popular gaming phrase " can I run bf?". But there is a phrase which garned attention such as "can it run crysis?" That even top gaming sites have acknowledged and proven
m
0
l
March 12, 2014 10:58:54 AM

caj said:
Contrary to what you think I base an engine on what I have seen it do in terms of effects, graphics and performance, not on fanboyism. You probably never head of the popular gaming phrase " can I run bf?". But there is a phrase which garned attention such as "can it run crysis?" That even top gaming sites have acknowledged and proven


I can run Crysis 3 without any lag on my low quality Radeon HD 6670 Its graphics are close to BF3 , Not as good as Battlefield but better than dead space 3 or Bioshock infinite .
m
0
l
August 27, 2014 4:31:11 AM

lemme see... u should know what version u r talking about right now ... is it unreal engine 4 vs cryengine 3 then;


cryengine 3 is slllliiiightly better than unreal engine 4 as unreal engine 4 has really photorealistic texture ability whereas cryengine has
life like shaders and cryengine 3 is more system friendly as it can run in athlon processor...yeah!
m
0
l
August 27, 2014 4:34:49 AM

SoumyaHD said:
Which is better in every aspect ?


please mention your engine version
m
0
l
August 27, 2014 6:22:41 AM

caj said:
Your kidin right? Frosbite is nothing in front of cryengine. Cryengine make pc go on their knees with still crysis 1 unplayable on ultra. That is bf4 already achievable with high or ultra. Try doing that with crysis 3? Ut going to need a 2 or 3 way sli just to achieve that on 1440p +. And far cry uses a diff engine known as modified dunia 2.5 engine.


I run Crysis 1 with every setting on the highest you can in 1080p at around 70 fps i never dip below 60
m
0
l
!