Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB SSD seems slow

alterego55

Distinguished
May 27, 2010
7
0
18,510
Win 7 x64 6.1 build 7601
Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 MB
AMD Phenom II x4 945 3Ghz.
Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB SSD - boot and system drive
4x Samsung 500 GB RAID 10 on separate volume

I recently replaced a Kingston 128 GB SSD with a Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB drive because I was getting disk errors on the Kingston. The new Samsung drive just doesn't seem as quick, which surprised me because I was replacing technology that was several years old with one that is more current. I didn't replace my Win 7 image, I did a full re-install. The overall performance seems to be a bit sluggish. I downloaded a disk performance utility called CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 which was recommended by some site which I don't remember.

-----------
The Tom's Hardware performance tests state the following for CrystalDiskMark Random Read/Write, 4 KB (QD=32):

Read: 394 MB/s
Write: 294.10 MB/s

On my system, I get the following metrics:
Read: 32.23 MB/s
Write: 67.51 MB/s
-----------
The Tom's Hardware performance tests indicate the following for CrystalDiskMark Sequential Read/Write [MB/s] ver 3.0 x64 (Test : 4000 MB, Repetition: 5x):

Read: 540.10
Write: 418.60

On my system, I get the following metrics:
Read: 302.2 MB/s
Write: 292.4 MB/s
-----------
The variance on both of these tests suggest its more than just a lab/real variance. Any ideas? Thx.
 

alterego55

Distinguished
May 27, 2010
7
0
18,510

Thx. Yeah, I looked at it and I think I'm snookered anyway.

When I first built this system about 4 years ago, I had this grand idea of setting up a separate boot/system drive with RAID 10 on 4 additional drives for performance and redundancy. Asus has two different storage configuration items: devices 1-4 and devices 5-6. I had to put my raid on 1-4 and my system disk on 5. The dropdown for 1-4 has AHCI, the drop down for 5-6 do not, only IDE and RAID. Looks like its time for another complete rebuild I guess.

 
points:
1) You are unlikely to notice the real-world difference above the speed you can operate at even though it's not full speed. The benchmark may "seem slow" but if your system feels sluggish I doubt it's the SSD but I can't troubleshoot things easily from here.

2) It's the SATA controller as you appear to know now. The latest INTEL controllers work best.

3) TEST VARIANCE:
This is normal. The tests measure different ways which is a little annoying.

*Use the Samsung Magician benchmark numbers. You should also use SM to:
a) Overprovision
b) Update the Firmware, and
c) Apply the profile (speed, in your case)
 

zambalek80

Reputable
Mar 20, 2014
1
0
4,510
Not trying to hijack this thread. But I got rather odd results with my 840 Pro (512GB version) too. Albeit exactly the opposite!
Here are my results from CrystalDiskMark:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 4393.037 MB/s
Sequential Write : 5548.565 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 2149.851 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 5647.494 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 256.668 MB/s [ 62663.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 286.114 MB/s [ 69852.0 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 296.128 MB/s [ 72296.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 279.678 MB/s [ 68280.8 IOPS]

Test : 50 MB [E: 11.6% (49.7/426.9 GB)] (x4)
Date : 2014/03/21 23:11:00
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

ATTO confirms these numbers.
Seems like something weird is going on with these drives.
BTW, my sys specs in a nutshell; i5-4670k (standard clock), ASUS Z87-Pro V Edition, 16GB DDR3-1600 CL8