MSI NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750Ti 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card
Tags:
-
Graphics
-
Graphics Cards
- Nvidia
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:03:51 PM
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
Related resources
- ZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce GTX660 2GB 2 GB DDR5 Graphics Card vs Galaxy NVIDIA GTX 750Ti 2GB OC 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card - Forum
- MSI AMD/ATI R7 260X 2GD5 OC 2 GB GDDR5 VSMSI NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750Ti/N750Ti TF 2GD5/OC 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card - Forum
- MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2GB GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 Graphics Card N660 TF 2GD5/OC - Forum
- Installing a MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2GB GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 Graphics Card N660 TF 2GD5/OC - Forum
- Will the Asus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card work with GA 970a-ds3p?? - Forum
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:13:40 PM
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
david271749 said:
Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.I don't know what you are smoking but yeah a GTX 750 Ti will be fine for Metro Last Light and Crysis 3 at 1920 x 1080 on ultra if you like 5 frames per second.
You want 4K gaming you need a GTX 780 Ti or even 2 GTX 780 Ti cards in Sli. Or a pair of 290 X cards in Crossfire. At least if you want the games to be playable.
-
Reply to anort3
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:28:39 PM
anort3 said:
david271749 said:
Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.I don't know what you are smoking but yeah a GTX 750 Ti will be fine for Metro Last Light and Crysis 3 at 1920 x 1080 on ultra if you like 5 frames per second.
You want 4K gaming you need a GTX 780 Ti or even 2 GTX 780 Ti cards in Sli. Or a pair of 290 X cards in Crossfire. At least if you want the games to be playable.
I own a HD 6670 1 gbddr5 graphics card (sapphire brand) Metro last light plays shitty on this gfx, But Crysis 3 dead space 3 BF3 plays like butter on medium settings. and I have a 1024x768 2006 Samsung SyncMaster 594MG CRT monitor, So I want to upgrade it with a 4k or a simple LCD or LED monitor.
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
1024 x 768 is a very very low resolution compared to 4K. 4K is 3840 x 2160 ( the most common one is anyway ) and has roughly 4 times as many pixels as 1920 x 1080.
So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.
I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.
So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.
I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.
-
Reply to anort3
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:38:00 PM
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:39:49 PM
anort3 said:
1024 x 768 is a very very low resolution compared to 4K. 4K is 3840 x 2160 ( the most common one is anyway ) and has roughly 4 times as many pixels as 1920 x 1080.So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.
I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.
Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:41:46 PM
anort3 said:
1024 x 768 is a very very low resolution compared to 4K. 4K is 3840 x 2160 ( the most common one is anyway ) and has roughly 4 times as many pixels as 1920 x 1080.So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.
I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.
My simple monitor supports playback of 1080p 720p or 480p videos.......so can it support 1080p resolution games If I upgrade my gfx to R9290X or gtx770 ??
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:44:05 PM
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:44:39 PM
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:51:10 PM
SoumyaHD
March 16, 2014 11:53:27 PM
anort3 said:
" Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure," is a quote from the movie Aliens. Since I am a moderator the enemy is spam.HAHA funny I collect spams, I have at least 20000 unread emails spams deposited in my email inbox and I don't who is sending or where he or she is getting my mail ID ??
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 17, 2014 12:02:42 AM
anort3 said:
Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?[/msgquoted said:
Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.
]Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?
Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.
Oh no ........I have installed a FX 8350 and ati sapphire 6670 1 gb ddr5
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
20,000?
If we mods didn't do a good job that would be all you would see on Tom's. We mostly have it fixed now but even a few months ago banning over 100 spammers a night was not unusual for every mod. And there are over 50 of us!
http://youtu.be/aCbfMkh940Q
If we mods didn't do a good job that would be all you would see on Tom's. We mostly have it fixed now but even a few months ago banning over 100 spammers a night was not unusual for every mod. And there are over 50 of us!
http://youtu.be/aCbfMkh940Q
-
Reply to anort3
m
0
l
SoumyaHD said:
anort3 said:
Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?[/msgquoted said:
Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.
Oh no ........I have installed a FX 8350 and ati sapphire 6670 1 gb ddr5]Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?
Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.
Oh no ........I have installed a FX 8350 and ati sapphire 6670 1 gb ddr5[/msgquoted]
The difference is very small.
-
Reply to anort3
m
0
l
david271749 said:
Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.You're on somethin'. Probably some of it not legal.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-750-ti-...
The 750 Ti barely manages over 50 fps on Medium. There's no way it plays Metro: LL on Ultra, unless you like stop-motion video games.
SoumyaHD said:
My simple monitor supports playback of 1080p 720p or 480p videos.......so can it support 1080p resolution games If I upgrade my gfx to R9290X or gtx770 ??
If your monitor only supports 1024x768, you're not actually seeing those videos at 1080p. It will not run 1080p resolution games just because you upgraded your graphics card, you will still be limited to 1024x768. You will have to upgrade to an actual 1080p monitor to get 1080p resolution games.
-
Reply to CraigN
m
0
l
This thread is silly! Why do you think Nvidia and AMD make very high-end graphics cards? It's definitely not so their mid-range cards will perform equally as well. A 750 ti is a decent card, but by "decent," I mean that you'll be able to simply run games; not max them out.
My rig has a lot of high-end stuff (including a 750 ti paired with a 780 ti), and it still won't maintain a perfect 60 fps in all games at 1080p when all settings are turned all the way up. Currently, no video card can do that. Try maxing out Crysis 3 and get back to me on the fps you get. My 780 ti uses the 750 ti as a dedicated PhysX card, and those cards run on a 3930k running at 3.2 Ghz with 32 GB of 2133 Ram, and the data feeds off a 750 GB Samsung EVO. If all that won't maintain perfect frames at 1080p with settings all the way up, you'll for sure be unable to do it with a 750 ti alone. Be realistic.
I don't mean to say the 750 ti sucks. You'll be able to play games smoothly at mid-settings at 1080p (better settings for lower resolutions), but that is about it. The card is made to do that, and that is what it does well.
My rig has a lot of high-end stuff (including a 750 ti paired with a 780 ti), and it still won't maintain a perfect 60 fps in all games at 1080p when all settings are turned all the way up. Currently, no video card can do that. Try maxing out Crysis 3 and get back to me on the fps you get. My 780 ti uses the 750 ti as a dedicated PhysX card, and those cards run on a 3930k running at 3.2 Ghz with 32 GB of 2133 Ram, and the data feeds off a 750 GB Samsung EVO. If all that won't maintain perfect frames at 1080p with settings all the way up, you'll for sure be unable to do it with a 750 ti alone. Be realistic.
I don't mean to say the 750 ti sucks. You'll be able to play games smoothly at mid-settings at 1080p (better settings for lower resolutions), but that is about it. The card is made to do that, and that is what it does well.
-
Reply to Eggz
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 17, 2014 10:09:33 AM
Just because you can play a video in 1080p on youtube or off your hard drive doesn't mean you actually support 1080p video, or are even seeing it in 1080p. If you full screen it, it's just being scaled to fit your resolution. If you can't set your monitor resolution to 1080p, it doesn't "support" 1080p.
-
Reply to CraigN
m
0
l
SoumyaHD
March 18, 2014 4:44:44 AM
CraigN said:
Just because you can play a video in 1080p on youtube or off your hard drive doesn't mean you actually support 1080p video, or are even seeing it in 1080p. If you full screen it, it's just being scaled to fit your resolution. If you can't set your monitor resolution to 1080p, it doesn't "support" 1080p.I am watching,streaming and even playing blu-ray movies and it easily eats all things ......Samsung SyncMaster 594MG Rocks..........
-
Reply to SoumyaHD
m
0
l
Yes, but that doesn't mean it's *actually* at 1080p. I'm not sure how else to get that across to you, as I'm repeating myself at this point. It's downscaled to fit your monitor resolution. If you actually scaled it, you wouldn't see the whole picture. You can watch blu rays on a 480p TV too, but it doesn't mean you're watching it at 1080p.
You're watching it downscaled to fit your current resolution. Does it look better than content shot in your natural resolution? Yes. But it's not *actually* playing at the resolution you're thinking it is. You can't fit 1920x1080 pixels on your 1024x768 pixel monitor.
http://punchcut.com/perspectives/expanding-universe-too...
Maybe this infographic will help. If you opened that 1080p video in full size (*not* full screen), on your 1024x768 monitor, you couldn't even fit 40% of the pixels on your screen. You're not watching in 1080p. You are watching 1080p downscaled to 1024x768.
Yes, you can play all the 1080p format you like. But you're not actually seeing it at 1080p. What I'm also telling you is that upgrading your video card will not magically make your ancient CRT be able to actually go to 1080p resolution. You're stuck at 1024x768 unless you upgrade your monitor, and if you're fine with that, then fine, but don't misinform yourself just because you can play 1080p media on your computer. I can play 4K content on my computer too, whoop dee doo, but doesn't mean I can actually fit 3840x2160 pixels on my 1920x1080 pixel monitor.
You're watching it downscaled to fit your current resolution. Does it look better than content shot in your natural resolution? Yes. But it's not *actually* playing at the resolution you're thinking it is. You can't fit 1920x1080 pixels on your 1024x768 pixel monitor.
http://punchcut.com/perspectives/expanding-universe-too...
Maybe this infographic will help. If you opened that 1080p video in full size (*not* full screen), on your 1024x768 monitor, you couldn't even fit 40% of the pixels on your screen. You're not watching in 1080p. You are watching 1080p downscaled to 1024x768.
Yes, you can play all the 1080p format you like. But you're not actually seeing it at 1080p. What I'm also telling you is that upgrading your video card will not magically make your ancient CRT be able to actually go to 1080p resolution. You're stuck at 1024x768 unless you upgrade your monitor, and if you're fine with that, then fine, but don't misinform yourself just because you can play 1080p media on your computer. I can play 4K content on my computer too, whoop dee doo, but doesn't mean I can actually fit 3840x2160 pixels on my 1920x1080 pixel monitor.
-
Reply to CraigN
m
0
l
Shadow_Blade92
August 15, 2014 6:13:11 AM
SoumyaHD said:
Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??I happen to own a GTX 750 Ti and I am pleased to inform you that at a 1920 x 1080 resolution, you should be able to run Metro Last Light on Very High, Battlefield 4 on Ultra, Tomb Raider 2013 on Very High, Call of Duty Ghosts (if you must play it) on High, Saints Row IV on Ultra, and Bioshock Infinite on Ultra.
However, if you are going to try for 4K, a GTX 750 Ti might stand a fair chance on Low settings, but for the most part I can't tell you the 4K performance of it because I don't own a 4K Monitor. For reference a Titan Black can barely run games at 4K.
In the end, the GTX 750 Ti is a great card. At least it can output a 4K resolution. If gaming isn't your thing, you could use a 4K monitor, and just play games at a lower resolution. Hope this helped!
Oh, and if you do decide to get a 4K monitor, watch out for 30Hz! Go for 60Hz or even 120Hz.
-
Reply to Shadow_Blade92
m
0
l
zaysk
August 15, 2014 9:15:09 AM
Shadow_Blade92 said:
SoumyaHD said:
Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??I happen to own a GTX 750 Ti and I am pleased to inform you that at a 1920 x 1080 resolution, you should be able to run Metro Last Light on Very High, Battlefield 4 on Ultra, Tomb Raider 2013 on Very High, Call of Duty Ghosts (if you must play it) on High, Saints Row IV on Ultra, and Bioshock Infinite on Ultra.
However, if you are going to try for 4K, a GTX 750 Ti might stand a fair chance on Low settings, but for the most part I can't tell you the 4K performance of it because I don't own a 4K Monitor. For reference a Titan Black can barely run games at 4K.
In the end, the GTX 750 Ti is a great card. At least it can output a 4K resolution. If gaming isn't your thing, you could use a 4K monitor, and just play games at a lower resolution. Hope this helped!
Oh, and if you do decide to get a 4K monitor, watch out for 30Hz! Go for 60Hz or even 120Hz.
I'm not trying to be a douche, but do you have any proof of that? Because my GTX 770 will average 60-70FPS (With SSAA off) and drop to around 40FPS at hectic times in Metro LL, and that's with a 750ti as a dedicated physx card. Same with Battlefield 4, it runs at about 90FPS with drops below 60 when things get crazy. I just don't see a 750ti running those games at acceptable FPS on ultra settings, since even my 770 will drop below 60, I'm scared to know how far the 750ti alone will drop, or even what it's average is.
@OP, do yourself a favor and get a nice 1080p monitor for yourself, as others have said, you need at LEAST dual 780's to even run games at medium-highish on 4k. The hardware just isn't there yet, unless you wanna spend a metric crap ton of money on GPU's alone.
-
Reply to zaysk
m
0
l
Shadow_Blade92
August 15, 2014 9:33:43 AM
zaysk said:
Shadow_Blade92 said:
SoumyaHD said:
Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??I happen to own a GTX 750 Ti and I am pleased to inform you that at a 1920 x 1080 resolution, you should be able to run Metro Last Light on Very High, Battlefield 4 on Ultra, Tomb Raider 2013 on Very High, Call of Duty Ghosts (if you must play it) on High, Saints Row IV on Ultra, and Bioshock Infinite on Ultra.
However, if you are going to try for 4K, a GTX 750 Ti might stand a fair chance on Low settings, but for the most part I can't tell you the 4K performance of it because I don't own a 4K Monitor. For reference a Titan Black can barely run games at 4K.
In the end, the GTX 750 Ti is a great card. At least it can output a 4K resolution. If gaming isn't your thing, you could use a 4K monitor, and just play games at a lower resolution. Hope this helped!
Oh, and if you do decide to get a 4K monitor, watch out for 30Hz! Go for 60Hz or even 120Hz.
I'm not trying to be a douche, but do you have any proof of that? Because my GTX 770 will average 60-70FPS (With SSAA off) and drop to around 40FPS at hectic times in Metro LL, and that's with a 750ti as a dedicated physx card. Same with Battlefield 4, it runs at about 90FPS with drops below 60 when things get crazy. I just don't see a 750ti running those games at acceptable FPS on ultra settings, since even my 770 will drop below 60, I'm scared to know how far the 750ti alone will drop, or even what it's average is.
@OP, do yourself a favor and get a nice 1080p monitor for yourself, as others have said, you need at LEAST dual 780's to even run games at medium-highish on 4k. The hardware just isn't there yet, unless you wanna spend a metric crap ton of money on GPU's alone.
Would you like me to provide proof? I can easily post a video on youtube of my system, (core i5, 750ti, 1080p) playing a few games that i mentioned on the settings I recommended. Also I don't think you are a douche, thanks for pointing out that I should have provided proof.
I will post a proof video on youtube shortly.
-
Reply to Shadow_Blade92
m
0
l
If you do, make sure to have FPS showing, as Youtube only shows in 30 or 60 FPS (has that been added yet?) videos.
The reason he's skeptical is because Tom's own review of the 750 Ti gives the 750 Ti barely an average of 36 FPS on BF4 on Ultra and 50 FPS on Metro: LL on MEDIUM with no SSAA OR PhysX. I could be alone in this belief, but I don't personally consider 30 FPS at high settings to be "acceptable" performance.
![]()
The reason he's skeptical is because Tom's own review of the 750 Ti gives the 750 Ti barely an average of 36 FPS on BF4 on Ultra and 50 FPS on Metro: LL on MEDIUM with no SSAA OR PhysX. I could be alone in this belief, but I don't personally consider 30 FPS at high settings to be "acceptable" performance.

-
Reply to CraigN
m
0
l
Related resources
- SolvedNvidia GeForce GTX 650 Graphics Card 2GB GDDR5 vs AMD HD7750 2GB DDR3 Forum
- SolvedPalit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 JETSTREAM 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card Forum
- SolvedZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card Forum
- Asus Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC 2GB GDDR5 Graphics Card + AMD A8-5600K Forum
- Is Gainward NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card compatible with Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2 Motherboard Forum
- Sapphire AMD/ATI HD 7790 OC 2 GB GDDR5 or ZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card is more powerful? Forum
- is ZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card compatible with Intel DH67CL motherboard Forum
- Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 2 GB GDDR5 GV-N650OC-2GI Graphics Card VS Sapphire AMD/ATI HD 7770 OC Edition 1 GB GDDR5 Forum
- Is GIGABYTE GA-MA790XT-UD4P compatible with a MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750Ti 2GB Forum
- SolvedIs a msi z87-g43 lga 1150 motherboard compatible with a asus nvidia geforce gtx 760 directcu ii oc 2gb gddr5 grap Forum
- SolvedIs ZOTAC NVIDIA GTX 750TI 2 GB DDR5 Graphics Card compatible with my cpu Forum
- SolvedMSI NVIDIA N650-2GD5/OC 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card Forum
- SolvedMSI NVIDIA N760 TF 2GD5/OC 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card Forum
- SolvedZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce GTX650 1GB 1 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card Forum
- which graphics card is better the Asus Nvidia GeForce 2GB GTX 670 DirectCU II or the MSI GTX 670 OC Power Edition 2GB Forum
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!