Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

MSI NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750Ti 2 GB GDDR5 Graphics Card

Tags:
  • Graphics
  • Graphics Cards
  • Nvidia
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
March 16, 2014 11:03:51 PM

Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??

More about : msi nvidia nvidia geforce gtx 750ti gddr5 graphics card

a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 16, 2014 11:10:05 PM

No. Medium to high settings at resolutions less than 1920 x 1080. You want ultra settings at full HD resolution on those games you need a GTX 770 or 780.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:11:10 PM

Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.
m
0
l
Related resources
March 16, 2014 11:13:40 PM

anort3 said:
No. Medium to high settings at resolutions less than 1920 x 1080. You want ultra settings at full HD resolution on those games you need a GTX 770 or 780.


I want to play games at 4K ultra high resolution in future. Can the price fall of GTX 780 or 770 in future or it will increase ??
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:16:07 PM

Oh. Well on a 4k things are different. Prices may go down here and there when 800 series comes out. You have to check different places every day for sales, if you want to find a good deal on a 770/780.
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 16, 2014 11:19:47 PM

david271749 said:
Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.


I don't know what you are smoking but yeah a GTX 750 Ti will be fine for Metro Last Light and Crysis 3 at 1920 x 1080 on ultra if you like 5 frames per second.


You want 4K gaming you need a GTX 780 Ti or even 2 GTX 780 Ti cards in Sli. Or a pair of 290 X cards in Crossfire. At least if you want the games to be playable.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:25:57 PM

More like 25-45 fps, but ok. Not everone likes to spend more on video cards than what consoles cost.
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:28:39 PM

anort3 said:
david271749 said:
Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.


I don't know what you are smoking but yeah a GTX 750 Ti will be fine for Metro Last Light and Crysis 3 at 1920 x 1080 on ultra if you like 5 frames per second.


You want 4K gaming you need a GTX 780 Ti or even 2 GTX 780 Ti cards in Sli. Or a pair of 290 X cards in Crossfire. At least if you want the games to be playable.

I own a HD 6670 1 gbddr5 graphics card (sapphire brand) Metro last light plays shitty on this gfx, But Crysis 3 dead space 3 BF3 plays like butter on medium settings. and I have a 1024x768 2006 Samsung SyncMaster 594MG CRT monitor, So I want to upgrade it with a 4k or a simple LCD or LED monitor.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:32:43 PM

It really depends on what screen you end up getting. If you get a 4k, listen to anort3. If you get a basic 1080p lcd/led, you'll be fine with a 750ti/660/760.
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 16, 2014 11:35:42 PM

1024 x 768 is a very very low resolution compared to 4K. 4K is 3840 x 2160 ( the most common one is anyway ) and has roughly 4 times as many pixels as 1920 x 1080.

So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.

I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:38:00 PM

david271749 said:
It really depends on what screen you end up getting. If you get a 4k, listen to anort3. If you get a basic 1080p lcd/led, you'll be fine with a 750ti/660/760.


Basic 1080p resolution is OK, I don't have that much money to buy a 4K monitor, I 'm just a student .:D 
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:39:49 PM

anort3 said:
1024 x 768 is a very very low resolution compared to 4K. 4K is 3840 x 2160 ( the most common one is anyway ) and has roughly 4 times as many pixels as 1920 x 1080.

So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.

I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.


Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:39:58 PM

How much are you looking on spenidng? I wouldn't go above $150 for a 750ti. 660 is even better and only about $30 more.
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 16, 2014 11:40:09 PM

A GTX 760 will let you max most of those games although with AA/AF turned down.
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:41:46 PM

anort3 said:
1024 x 768 is a very very low resolution compared to 4K. 4K is 3840 x 2160 ( the most common one is anyway ) and has roughly 4 times as many pixels as 1920 x 1080.

So yeah at 1024 x 768 on medium a GTX 750 Ti is fine. In fact at 1024 x 768 you could probably max most games with a GTX 750 Ti. To max games at 4K you are looking at a minimum of $1000 just on graphics cards though.

I have an EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked paired with an overclocked 2600K and I can max pretty much everything at 1920 x 1080. However I still have to turn AA down on some games Like Metro Last Light and Crysis 3. So to truly max games even at 1920 x 1080 you need a minimum GTX 770 and a GTX 780 is not crazy.

My simple monitor supports playback of 1080p 720p or 480p videos.......so can it support 1080p resolution games If I upgrade my gfx to R9290X or gtx770 ??
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:42:08 PM

You could probably find a used 760 for $200.
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 16, 2014 11:42:40 PM

Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ? said:
Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?



Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.

m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:44:05 PM

What this means Nuke the spam from orbit.
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:44:39 PM

You want to wipe out spam by an atom bomb ??
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 16, 2014 11:46:27 PM

" Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure," is a quote from the movie Aliens. Since I am a moderator the enemy is spam.
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:51:10 PM

david271749 said:
You could probably find a used 760 for $200.


where ?? I will definitely buy but....warranty period ?? You cannot trust electronics products today is good and working and tomorrow it might not work .
m
0
l
March 16, 2014 11:53:27 PM

anort3 said:
" Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure," is a quote from the movie Aliens. Since I am a moderator the enemy is spam.


HAHA funny I collect spams, I have at least 20000 unread emails spams deposited in my email inbox and I don't who is sending or where he or she is getting my mail ID ??:p 
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 16, 2014 11:56:27 PM

Well. What country are you in? Don't buy from ebay. Buy from an electronics/pc shop with a return policy. I bought a used 760 for that price from a pc shop. The card came with everything like original packaging, and it's been working just fine for the last two months.
m
0
l
March 17, 2014 12:02:42 AM

anort3 said:
Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?[/msgquoted said:



Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.

]Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?



Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.



Oh no ........I have installed a FX 8350 and ati sapphire 6670 1 gb ddr5
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 17, 2014 12:02:50 AM

20,000? :lol: 

If we mods didn't do a good job that would be all you would see on Tom's. We mostly have it fixed now but even a few months ago banning over 100 spammers a night was not unusual for every mod. And there are over 50 of us!

http://youtu.be/aCbfMkh940Q
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 17, 2014 12:03:49 AM

SoumyaHD said:
anort3 said:
Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?[/msgquoted said:



Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.



Oh no ........I have installed a FX 8350 and ati sapphire 6670 1 gb ddr5]Nvidia and Intel vs AMD and aTi which one is better in gfx vs cpu respectively ?



Nvidia cards don't care what CPU they are paired with. AMD cards do better with Intel CPUs.



Oh no ........I have installed a FX 8350 and ati sapphire 6670 1 gb ddr5[/msgquoted]

The difference is very small.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 17, 2014 1:04:47 AM

Am I allowed to use your nuke gif?
m
0
l
a c 264 U Graphics card
a c 93 Î Nvidia
March 17, 2014 1:09:57 AM

DelroyMonjo said:
Am I allowed to use your nuke gif?


It's not mine, I found it with google fu so I don't care. There are others if you don't want an exact copy. Just google it.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b Î Nvidia
March 17, 2014 6:16:31 AM

david271749 said:
Yes. You'll be fine with that card at ultra with 1080p resolution. You don't need to spend all your money on a 770/780.


You're on somethin'. Probably some of it not legal.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-750-ti-...

The 750 Ti barely manages over 50 fps on Medium. There's no way it plays Metro: LL on Ultra, unless you like stop-motion video games.

SoumyaHD said:

My simple monitor supports playback of 1080p 720p or 480p videos.......so can it support 1080p resolution games If I upgrade my gfx to R9290X or gtx770 ??


If your monitor only supports 1024x768, you're not actually seeing those videos at 1080p. It will not run 1080p resolution games just because you upgraded your graphics card, you will still be limited to 1024x768. You will have to upgrade to an actual 1080p monitor to get 1080p resolution games.

m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
March 17, 2014 6:48:11 AM

This thread is silly! Why do you think Nvidia and AMD make very high-end graphics cards? It's definitely not so their mid-range cards will perform equally as well. A 750 ti is a decent card, but by "decent," I mean that you'll be able to simply run games; not max them out.

My rig has a lot of high-end stuff (including a 750 ti paired with a 780 ti), and it still won't maintain a perfect 60 fps in all games at 1080p when all settings are turned all the way up. Currently, no video card can do that. Try maxing out Crysis 3 and get back to me on the fps you get. My 780 ti uses the 750 ti as a dedicated PhysX card, and those cards run on a 3930k running at 3.2 Ghz with 32 GB of 2133 Ram, and the data feeds off a 750 GB Samsung EVO. If all that won't maintain perfect frames at 1080p with settings all the way up, you'll for sure be unable to do it with a 750 ti alone. Be realistic.

I don't mean to say the 750 ti sucks. You'll be able to play games smoothly at mid-settings at 1080p (better settings for lower resolutions), but that is about it. The card is made to do that, and that is what it does well.
m
0
l
March 17, 2014 10:09:33 AM

Give me some decent list of LED/ LCD monitors around $100.... reputed online store. But My Sncmater 594MG CRT supports 1080p videos ?? why ?
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b Î Nvidia
March 17, 2014 10:34:35 AM

Just because you can play a video in 1080p on youtube or off your hard drive doesn't mean you actually support 1080p video, or are even seeing it in 1080p. If you full screen it, it's just being scaled to fit your resolution. If you can't set your monitor resolution to 1080p, it doesn't "support" 1080p.
m
0
l
March 18, 2014 4:44:44 AM

CraigN said:
Just because you can play a video in 1080p on youtube or off your hard drive doesn't mean you actually support 1080p video, or are even seeing it in 1080p. If you full screen it, it's just being scaled to fit your resolution. If you can't set your monitor resolution to 1080p, it doesn't "support" 1080p.


I am watching,streaming and even playing blu-ray movies and it easily eats all things ......Samsung SyncMaster 594MG Rocks..........
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b Î Nvidia
March 18, 2014 5:32:09 AM

Yes, but that doesn't mean it's *actually* at 1080p. I'm not sure how else to get that across to you, as I'm repeating myself at this point. It's downscaled to fit your monitor resolution. If you actually scaled it, you wouldn't see the whole picture. You can watch blu rays on a 480p TV too, but it doesn't mean you're watching it at 1080p.

You're watching it downscaled to fit your current resolution. Does it look better than content shot in your natural resolution? Yes. But it's not *actually* playing at the resolution you're thinking it is. You can't fit 1920x1080 pixels on your 1024x768 pixel monitor.

http://punchcut.com/perspectives/expanding-universe-too...

Maybe this infographic will help. If you opened that 1080p video in full size (*not* full screen), on your 1024x768 monitor, you couldn't even fit 40% of the pixels on your screen. You're not watching in 1080p. You are watching 1080p downscaled to 1024x768.

Yes, you can play all the 1080p format you like. But you're not actually seeing it at 1080p. What I'm also telling you is that upgrading your video card will not magically make your ancient CRT be able to actually go to 1080p resolution. You're stuck at 1024x768 unless you upgrade your monitor, and if you're fine with that, then fine, but don't misinform yourself just because you can play 1080p media on your computer. I can play 4K content on my computer too, whoop dee doo, but doesn't mean I can actually fit 3840x2160 pixels on my 1920x1080 pixel monitor.
m
0
l
August 15, 2014 6:13:11 AM

SoumyaHD said:
Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??


I happen to own a GTX 750 Ti and I am pleased to inform you that at a 1920 x 1080 resolution, you should be able to run Metro Last Light on Very High, Battlefield 4 on Ultra, Tomb Raider 2013 on Very High, Call of Duty Ghosts (if you must play it) on High, Saints Row IV on Ultra, and Bioshock Infinite on Ultra.

However, if you are going to try for 4K, a GTX 750 Ti might stand a fair chance on Low settings, but for the most part I can't tell you the 4K performance of it because I don't own a 4K Monitor. For reference a Titan Black can barely run games at 4K.

In the end, the GTX 750 Ti is a great card. At least it can output a 4K resolution. If gaming isn't your thing, you could use a 4K monitor, and just play games at a lower resolution. Hope this helped!

Oh, and if you do decide to get a 4K monitor, watch out for 30Hz! Go for 60Hz or even 120Hz.
m
0
l
August 15, 2014 9:15:09 AM

Shadow_Blade92 said:
SoumyaHD said:
Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??


I happen to own a GTX 750 Ti and I am pleased to inform you that at a 1920 x 1080 resolution, you should be able to run Metro Last Light on Very High, Battlefield 4 on Ultra, Tomb Raider 2013 on Very High, Call of Duty Ghosts (if you must play it) on High, Saints Row IV on Ultra, and Bioshock Infinite on Ultra.

However, if you are going to try for 4K, a GTX 750 Ti might stand a fair chance on Low settings, but for the most part I can't tell you the 4K performance of it because I don't own a 4K Monitor. For reference a Titan Black can barely run games at 4K.

In the end, the GTX 750 Ti is a great card. At least it can output a 4K resolution. If gaming isn't your thing, you could use a 4K monitor, and just play games at a lower resolution. Hope this helped!

Oh, and if you do decide to get a 4K monitor, watch out for 30Hz! Go for 60Hz or even 120Hz.


I'm not trying to be a douche, but do you have any proof of that? Because my GTX 770 will average 60-70FPS (With SSAA off) and drop to around 40FPS at hectic times in Metro LL, and that's with a 750ti as a dedicated physx card. Same with Battlefield 4, it runs at about 90FPS with drops below 60 when things get crazy. I just don't see a 750ti running those games at acceptable FPS on ultra settings, since even my 770 will drop below 60, I'm scared to know how far the 750ti alone will drop, or even what it's average is.

@OP, do yourself a favor and get a nice 1080p monitor for yourself, as others have said, you need at LEAST dual 780's to even run games at medium-highish on 4k. The hardware just isn't there yet, unless you wanna spend a metric crap ton of money on GPU's alone.
m
0
l
August 15, 2014 9:33:43 AM

zaysk said:
Shadow_Blade92 said:
SoumyaHD said:
Can I play high graphics intensive games like Crysis 3 or Metro Last Light Call of Duty Ghosts,ht , Hitman Absolution, The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, Battlefield 4, Tomb Raider (2013) in ultra high settings ??


I happen to own a GTX 750 Ti and I am pleased to inform you that at a 1920 x 1080 resolution, you should be able to run Metro Last Light on Very High, Battlefield 4 on Ultra, Tomb Raider 2013 on Very High, Call of Duty Ghosts (if you must play it) on High, Saints Row IV on Ultra, and Bioshock Infinite on Ultra.

However, if you are going to try for 4K, a GTX 750 Ti might stand a fair chance on Low settings, but for the most part I can't tell you the 4K performance of it because I don't own a 4K Monitor. For reference a Titan Black can barely run games at 4K.

In the end, the GTX 750 Ti is a great card. At least it can output a 4K resolution. If gaming isn't your thing, you could use a 4K monitor, and just play games at a lower resolution. Hope this helped!

Oh, and if you do decide to get a 4K monitor, watch out for 30Hz! Go for 60Hz or even 120Hz.


I'm not trying to be a douche, but do you have any proof of that? Because my GTX 770 will average 60-70FPS (With SSAA off) and drop to around 40FPS at hectic times in Metro LL, and that's with a 750ti as a dedicated physx card. Same with Battlefield 4, it runs at about 90FPS with drops below 60 when things get crazy. I just don't see a 750ti running those games at acceptable FPS on ultra settings, since even my 770 will drop below 60, I'm scared to know how far the 750ti alone will drop, or even what it's average is.

@OP, do yourself a favor and get a nice 1080p monitor for yourself, as others have said, you need at LEAST dual 780's to even run games at medium-highish on 4k. The hardware just isn't there yet, unless you wanna spend a metric crap ton of money on GPU's alone.


Would you like me to provide proof? I can easily post a video on youtube of my system, (core i5, 750ti, 1080p) playing a few games that i mentioned on the settings I recommended. Also I don't think you are a douche, thanks for pointing out that I should have provided proof.

I will post a proof video on youtube shortly.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b Î Nvidia
August 18, 2014 5:11:58 AM

If you do, make sure to have FPS showing, as Youtube only shows in 30 or 60 FPS (has that been added yet?) videos.

The reason he's skeptical is because Tom's own review of the 750 Ti gives the 750 Ti barely an average of 36 FPS on BF4 on Ultra and 50 FPS on Metro: LL on MEDIUM with no SSAA OR PhysX. I could be alone in this belief, but I don't personally consider 30 FPS at high settings to be "acceptable" performance.


m
0
l
!