Samsung 840 evo 120gb low speeds!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kostas Sar

Reputable
Mar 19, 2014
5
0
4,510
Hello everyone,

I just got an SSD (samsung 840 evo 120gb).
After installing Samsung magician software and enabling everything on my computer that could boost its performance (sata 3, AHCI mode and Rapid Mode) i got awful results! Around 150mb/s read and 280mb/s write.
ss_samsung_magician.jpg



PC specs:

Windows 8 pro x64
Intel i5 760
Asrock p55 extreme4.
Samsung 840 EVO 120GB SSD
3 more sata III HDDs
4GB RAM
AMD Radeon 6870


Any suggestions?!!

Thank you in advance.
 
Solution
The problem has nothing to do with his cpu and everything to do with his motherboard. The marvell 912x sata3 controller cannot actually handle sata3 speeds. Move the ssd to one of the intel sata2 ports for best performance.

Theres quite a bit more mis-information in this thread.
- Intel does not use Northbridge/southbridge and hasn't in years. I think core2 was the last one to use it.
- Sequential read/write speeds are mostly useless to typical users & gamers. Its the random and access times where you get the most out of your drives. Toms SSD raid article should be proof enough of that.
- and as already stated by Freakboi, the cpu has little to do with drive I/O and everything to do with the chipset.
I see this almost every day in the forum. Ok.....the performance numbers that they advertise are given in a PERFECT, controlled in every way to optimize the speed of the SSD's way. You, me or the Dhali Lama won't ever get those numbers in real world computing. I know.....you wanted to see the numbers through the roof. I felt the same way. LOL BUT.....that's how it is.
 


Look where?

And I can tell you the difference in yours and his right off the bat. Look at your CPU. Look at his. You're running something with a benchmark dang near 10,000! LOL I would HOPE that it is capable of faster speeds in reading/writing. His CPU isn't capable of pushing the SSD to it's limit. It is bottlenecked performance.
 

Freakboi_pa

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2006
167
0
18,710
Actually, the CPU has little to do with transfer speeds. The southbridge controller handles all the data passed to and from the hard drives. See diagram http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northbridge_(computing)
 

Kostas Sar

Reputable
Mar 19, 2014
5
0
4,510

I said Rapid mode, from the samsung magician software, not raid. :)
 


His technology is several years old now. Yours is new. New processor, new chipset on the motherboard, new controller, new EVERYTHING. 3 years is FOREVER in computer terms. What was state of the art then is so so now.
 

Kostas Sar

Reputable
Mar 19, 2014
5
0
4,510


I wish it wasn't a problem (that way i wouldn't mind that much) but a friend of mine with the same ssd gets way better results...and i'm talking like double speed from my results...
 

Memhorder

Distinguished


Ahh yes you have a valid point. I gotta figure out how to upload lol.
 


I'm guessing that his entire system is newer/more powerful. I bet that I could plug that same SSD into my desktop (the parts for it are listed in my "signature" at the bottom of all my posts) and get double what you're getting. But my system is brand new with the latest, greatest CPU/chipset/controller.
 


That is a good point. And you're not alone in those numbers. I'll bet that 85 to 90 percent of computers with HDD's are getting no better. Maybe a higher number than that! The bottom line is SSD's are faster. MUCH faster.
 

popatim

Titan
Moderator
The problem has nothing to do with his cpu and everything to do with his motherboard. The marvell 912x sata3 controller cannot actually handle sata3 speeds. Move the ssd to one of the intel sata2 ports for best performance.

Theres quite a bit more mis-information in this thread.
- Intel does not use Northbridge/southbridge and hasn't in years. I think core2 was the last one to use it.
- Sequential read/write speeds are mostly useless to typical users & gamers. Its the random and access times where you get the most out of your drives. Toms SSD raid article should be proof enough of that.
- and as already stated by Freakboi, the cpu has little to do with drive I/O and everything to do with the chipset.
 
Solution

Memhorder

Distinguished
If Sequetial Read/Write wasn't all that important then why wouldn't Companies base their specs on Random. 94000 MB sounds a lot better than 540.
They are equally important. Hey Kostas. Did you by any chance install Windows while the BIOS settings were set to IDE or AHCI? Did you migrate Windows from a HDD?
 

Kostas Sar

Reputable
Mar 19, 2014
5
0
4,510


You were right! Moved my ssd to one the sata 2 ports and got way better results.

Thank you!
 

popatim

Titan
Moderator
Memhorder - random reads are the slowest and thus the worst thing an advertiser wants to use.

840 pro (not mine)
CDMb.jpg



but still way faster than any HDD. Below is a Seagate 3tb barracuda, one of the fastest 7200rpm drives made.
CDM-Seagate-Barracuda-XT-3TB-Hard-Drive-ST33000651AS.png



@ Kostas Sar - Your Welcome.
 

Memhorder

Distinguished
Yeah sorry popatim for doubting you. I wasn't paying attention. The Sequential R/W are in MB/s and the Random is IOPS. My mistake. Glad you caught this because I thought Kostas Sar was reaping all the benefits he could get out of his SSD. They still were higher than HDD. Good job!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.