X Fire 7970ghz or 1x GTX780Ti for similar money

Kkkk1

Distinguished
Nov 14, 2006
866
13
19,115
Guys,
I currently have a 7970 Ghz edition card am thinking of upgrading my montior from 1920x1080 to 2560 x 1080. Do I add another 7970ghz for around £250- £300 or sell my current 7970Ghz for similar money and put it towards a single 780Ti with the total cost about the same?

Any advise appreciated.:wahoo:
 
Solution
Or consider this:

"Price-wise, the R9 290 is closer in price to the GTX 770 than it is the GTX 780. There is a $70 price difference between the GTX 770 and R9 290. However, compared to the GTX 780, the R9 290 is a whole $100 less expensive than the GeForce GTX 780. Performance-wise, the R9 290 is on par with the GeForce GTX 780. The R9 290 is a much better performer than the GTX 770 or Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition. The R9 290 is providing the performance of GTX 780, at $100 less cost. The value favors the AMD Radeon R9 290 in an epic way. The Radeon R9 290 provides the most value for single-display gaming on the market today."

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/11/04/amd_radeon_r9_290_video_card_review/9#.Uyq4EPl5NLE

Sell the 7970...

Kkkk1

Distinguished
Nov 14, 2006
866
13
19,115


Yeah I know, I used to have a 5970 dual GPU card the only game I had a problem with microstuttering on was FarCry 3 but 99% was very solid so XFire won't put me off.
 

Zickawesome

Reputable
Mar 10, 2014
37
0
4,540
I would rather get a Radeon r9 290X you save money, AND get a strong FPS leap than with 7970

An example: TO THE LEFT- R9 290X/ TO THE RIGHT Radeon 7970

Much higher pixel rate 64 GPixel/s vs 29.6 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 5,632 GFLOPS vs 3,789 GFLOPS Around 50% better floating-point performance
More memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 925 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Many more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Higher texture rate 176 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel/s Around 50% higher texture rate
Higher memory bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 264 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
More shading units 2,816 vs 2,048 768 more shading units
More texture mapping units 176 vs 128 48 more texture mapping units
More compute units 44 vs 32 12 more compute units
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 94.9 fps vs 70.4 fps Around 35% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Wider memory bus 512 bit vs 384 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
 

Kkkk1

Distinguished
Nov 14, 2006
866
13
19,115


Great point many thanks. The R290X is an interesting point in the previous post as well.
 

Zickawesome

Reputable
Mar 10, 2014
37
0
4,540
Or consider this:

"Price-wise, the R9 290 is closer in price to the GTX 770 than it is the GTX 780. There is a $70 price difference between the GTX 770 and R9 290. However, compared to the GTX 780, the R9 290 is a whole $100 less expensive than the GeForce GTX 780. Performance-wise, the R9 290 is on par with the GeForce GTX 780. The R9 290 is a much better performer than the GTX 770 or Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition. The R9 290 is providing the performance of GTX 780, at $100 less cost. The value favors the AMD Radeon R9 290 in an epic way. The Radeon R9 290 provides the most value for single-display gaming on the market today."

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/11/04/amd_radeon_r9_290_video_card_review/9#.Uyq4EPl5NLE

Sell the 7970, buy a 290, and buy one in the future also, and crossfire thoose.
 
Solution

Kkkk1

Distinguished
Nov 14, 2006
866
13
19,115


Sold! many thanks 290 it is
 

Zickawesome

Reputable
Mar 10, 2014
37
0
4,540


Awesome, Hope you have a nice day, and really hope that my advice gives you awesome gaming moments!