Is the AMD HD 7970 6GB a better purchase than the GTX770 4GB?

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540
Hi, I've been checking the benchmarks and the AMD seems to win on half of them while on the other half the nVidia wins, which one do you guys recommend?

I've been buying nVidias lately because of CUDA, I convert videos a lot, but lately it seems that most apps use DirectCompute.

I found both around - I normally purchase from Amazon or NewEgg.

I need it for HD gaming, ray-tracing and video rendering and to use 3 independent monitors (1 VGA/DVI and 2 HDMI, all different models and sizes).

My specs are: i7 930 + Patriot Viper 12GB Triple Channel + Sound Blaster Fatality Xtreme Gamer

Benchmarks: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/829?vs=768

Thanks!
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


Hello, I added more info that answers your question.

There are 4GB 7970's as well but the 6GB is not much expensive and if I decide to get the AMD then I will probrably pick 6GB if I can.

I posted on another thread a suggestion for a GFX card that supports 3 independent monitors, being 1 VGA/DVI and the 2 others HDMI, that's a requirement for me.
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


Hi, I'm using mainly Anandtech to compare and like I said on some games the nVidia wins and some the AMD wins, I've been using nVidia lately (currently have a GTX 560) and that's why I'm asking you guys an advise if it would be a good idea to switch to AMD in this case.

Thank you
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


I'm gaming actually, I have 90+ games on Steam, most are heavy on the graphics, my current GTX 560 does the job but I'm getting an updated GFX to handle the 3 independent displays and thought it would be a good idea to do an upgrade.
 



If you want 6GB and it's not much more expensive, why not.
There are already some threads of people wanting to buy 6GB versions of the GTX 780 Ti card(it uses 3GB originally) for high VRAM games. They're just staying safe. Just don't get bad value for money, that's the main point.
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


I agree, I can go for 3-4GB no problem as long as they support 3 independent displays (not for gaming).
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


My concern is that I don't see 2 HDMI ports on the back of these latest cards.

I checked and the 260X is much inferior than the 7970.
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


My problem now is that I need to convert one of the HDMI to DisplayPort, right?

My current gfx has 2 HDMi as I needed but they work as "Dual HDMI" instead of independent.
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540




My current gfx doesn't have that option, with the new one I suppose I will be able to but I'm facing now a connector problem.

1 monitor VGA/DVI - 19" 4:3
1 monitor HDMI/DIV - 27" 16:9
1 monitor HDMI/VGA/DVI - 21.5" 16:9 (rotated 90º)
 
It's the manufacturer's discretion. Some follow NVIDIA's reference design, some their own. The one you're looking at is a custom design. NVIDIA's specifications list the card to have 2 DVI ports and 1 mini-HDMI port.
Both DVI and HDMI have a digital signal. You could connect a converter to a DVI port and use it as HDMI:
dvi-to-hdmi-ada-1.jpg

If you can find a card with 1 standard HDMI connector and 2 DVI ports, you can connect 3 HDMI monitors to your card.
 

AshyCFC

Honorable


I understand that, you plug the displayport end into the GPU and the HDMI end into the monitor!
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


That's great, I didn't know that there were passive cables for that!

Is it safe now to say that I can plug my 19" to the DVI port, my 21.5" to the HDMI port and my 27" to the display port using this cable and they will be completely independent running on the 7970 or GTX 770?

I'm really inclined to get the SAPPHIRE's HD 7970 Vapor-X 6GB OC Edition and secondly the Gigabyte GTX 770 GDDR5-4GB.
 
Yes, cables can work passively. It's just a different arrangement of wires.
All monitors are independently configurable. You can find the options in the NVIDIA control panel or Catalyst control Center(assuming that is what it's called for AMD cards, I'm not a AMD user).
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540
If the cable is short, you don't need active cables. Active cables are needed only for enhancing the signal(or if the signal is big).
Big in the sense, there is a new port coming up (Thunderbolt) which has double bandwidth of USB3.0 (10Gbps) and it is being considered for setups which allow graphics cards to be housed in separate enclosures. That interface has native active interface.
 

Paul F

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2014
56
0
18,540


Thanks man, I just grabbed one of these: Amazon

My cable setup will be:


    1 VGA Monitor connected to the DVI port on the video card
    1 HDMI monitor connected to the HDMI port on the video card
    1 HDMI monitor connected to the mini-Display port on the video card using the adapter


I just hope that this card won't "join" any of the signals like my current GTX650 did when I plugged 2 HDMIs and the DVI, but keep them separate.