- Mar 22, 2014
- 2
- 0
- 4,510
Hey! Just wandering what my Phenom II x6 1100t @ 4.0GHz compares to based on modern CPU standards.
How's my old CPU vs the more modern ones?
- Thread starter dillonc343
- Start date
Solution
- Nov 7, 2011
- 73,340
- 3,857
- 176,290
Gee Bee
Honorable
- Jan 16, 2014
- 999
- 0
- 11,360
If compared to another AMD FX 8320. Slightly to significantly slower depending on application, does not o/c as well and missing newer instruction sets.
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score 9,317 vs 2,532.3 Around 3.8x better PassMark (Overclocked) score
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark score 8,183 vs 5,944 Around 40% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.67 GHz vs 4.09 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,402 vs 1,276 Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,200 vs 5,190 Around 20% better 3DMark11 physics score
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Dec, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 7.01 pt/W vs 4.73 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
From CPU boss
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score 9,317 vs 2,532.3 Around 3.8x better PassMark (Overclocked) score
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better PassMark score 8,183 vs 5,944 Around 40% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.67 GHz vs 4.09 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,402 vs 1,276 Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,200 vs 5,190 Around 20% better 3DMark11 physics score
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Dec, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 7.01 pt/W vs 4.73 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
From CPU boss
TRENDING THREADS
-
Question HELP !!!!! My Desktop PC randomly sends monitors to standby???
- Started by EpicsGamer
- Replies: 4
-
News Ryzen 9 7950X3D surfaces with 192MB L3 cache — 3D V-Cache ES CPU has 64MB more than retail CPU- Started by Admin
- Replies: 7
-
RTX 4060 Ti vs RX 7700 XT faceoff: Which midrange graphics card is superior?
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 25
-
News Nintendo obliterates 8,535 Yuzu repos — Nintendo's most effective DMCA takedown campaign in years
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 39
-
Question Is the bluetooth keyboard encrypted without pass code?
- Started by ohm-ish
- Replies: 2
Latest posts
-
-
-
Question HDR turns itself off immediately after being toggled on (Windows 10) ?
- Latest: continuum9753
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram