Accurate temperature sensing a reality?

fliberdygibits

Distinguished
Sep 14, 2011
20
0
18,510
I've been dubious about temp readings from CPUS and GPUs in the past but not thought too much of it. Recently tho a series of observations have me really confused.

I've got an HTPC with 8 Core AMD FX8300 and originally an R7 240 now upgraded to an R7 260X. EVEN under heavy load like running the new thief the old R7 would spin like a buzzsaw but report a temp that never went over 70 or 80 F. The CPU fan was noisy too so I decided to update the CPU cooler to an R7 260X and to add a Corsair H100 to the CPU. Now with a DIFFERENT video card under load it reports GPU temps of 35-40 F and the CPU now reports no higher than 55 F under load. It can't be over 70 in this room right now but still, I can't imagine ANY kind of water/air based cooling system being able to cool to 20 degrees below ambient.

Are the various temp sensors in a PC just inherently inaccurate? Is so, why include them? Can I calibrate them in some fashion or would it not help? I'm going to go grab one of those laser thermometers and make some notes but before then I just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts?
 

Xexoxix

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2012
364
1
18,860
AMD sensors have been known to not be very accurate. However, GPU sensors can be. The best option is to download the temperature monitoring program that is paired with your motherboard. In my case, it is MSI Control Center. A great program. GPU-Z has been really great for me, personally with accurate temps. My temps all seem the same with a bunch of programs GPU wise. Hope this helps.
 

TRENDING THREADS